---
title: "Avengers: Endgame"
year: 2019
kind: "film"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/avengers-endgame"
fi1m_id: "avengers-endgame"
imdb_id: "tt4154796"
tmdb_id: 299534
wikidata_id: "Q23781155"
fi1m_score: 79
critics_score: 86
critics_reviews: 6
published: "2026-09-14"
updated: "2026-09-18T08:38:23.686474+00:00"
region: "US"
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Avengers: Endgame (2019)

Directed by Joe Russo, Anthony Russo · 3h 01m · MPA PG-13 · Adventure, Science Fiction, Action

## Identity

Avengers: Endgame

- **Canonical:** https://film.one/film/avengers-endgame
- **Type:** Film
- **Fi1m ID:** avengers-endgame
- **IMDb ID:** tt4154796
- **TMDB ID:** 299534
- **Wikidata ID:** Q23781155
- **Same entity:** https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4154796/, https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/299534, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q23781155

**Fi1m score: 79** · Critics 86 from 6 reviews

*In a sentence:* The Avengers have booked three hours to discuss their feelings, and we were surprised how much we cared

> *Avengers: Endgame* gives its heroes enough time to matter, then rather more time than they need. We recommend this affectionate, often moving conclusion to anyone already invested, with reservations about the length and the routine-looking spectacle.

## Synopsis

The Avengers face the consequences of their conflict with Thanos, as the team struggles with loss. Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.), Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) and their fellow heroes have to consider what carrying on now means. Thor (Chris Hemsworth), Bruce Banner (Mark Ruffalo) and Natasha Romanoff (Scarlett Johansson) are among the ensemble. Directed by Anthony and Joe Russo, this instalment follows *Avengers: Infinity War* and brings the wider superhero saga towards a close. Its science-fiction adventure makes room for the personal aftermath of the conflict.

## Review

Anthony and Joe Russo have made a superhero conclusion that works because it allows the people inside the costumes to be unhappy for a while. *Avengers: Endgame* is good company for anyone who has followed these characters, though 181 minutes asks for more patience than it always repays. The aftermath of [*Avengers: Infinity War*](https://film.one/film/avengers-infinity-war) supplies something these films can too easily hurry past: consequences that affect how people behave. The attempt to deal with loss deserves the time it gets here.

Robert Downey Jr. gives Tony Stark the performance that holds our attention most firmly, letting the humour coexist with a tiredness that cannot be joked away. We were moved more than we expected by that weariness; the effort behind the comic manner makes the character’s distress difficult to dismiss. Chris Evans gives Steve Rogers a steadiness that might have been dull in a less attentive performance, but here feels necessary. Both actors make the conversations about carrying on worth listening to.

Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely’s screenplay understands the pleasure of returning to familiar people, and takes time over their responses to loss. The accumulated history matters, and the writing leans hard on an attachment it expects us to bring. For anyone arriving without that attachment, too much of the emotional work has already been done elsewhere. There are passages in which recognition seems to be doing a job that a sharper exchange, or a less dutiful scene, ought to do.

The broad handling of Thor is a particular irritation, and Chris Hemsworth is left making comedy out of material that needs more care. There is nothing wrong with allowing an unhappy superhero to be funny; Downey demonstrates that often enough. Here, though, the emphasis is too heavy, and the jokes weaken the attention paid to loss elsewhere. Jeffrey Ford and Matthew Schmidt’s editing keeps the large ensemble manageable, but too many stretches feel retained because someone would miss them.

Trent Opaloch’s cinematography does the practical work of keeping faces and action legible, without giving the film much visual character of its own. Charles Wood’s production design is equally undistinguished; the settings rarely demand a second look. That need not ruin an adventure, but it matters across a film this long, when so much depends on the pleasure of looking. We kept attending to the actors because their expressions offered more variety than the places around them.

Alan Silvestri’s music is more persuasive, giving the emotional passages an assurance the images sometimes lack. The action benefits from those personal stakes, and the Russos understand that a confrontation becomes more exciting when its participants have been allowed some life beyond it. By the standards of ensemble superhero films, the handling of individual personalities is unusually sure. The spectacle still has a tendency to outstay its welcome, but it does not erase the quieter acting that has given it a reason to matter.

We would not start here, however persuasive the cast might sound. The film expects familiarity with these people and makes few concessions to anyone without it, so this is a recommendation for the already committed. Even they may wish that a few more scenes had been shortened. If the Avengers already matter to you, give them the evening; just do not expect them to leave promptly.

*Fi1m score 79, published 14 September 2026.*

## What the critics say

Most critics find Avengers: Endgame a satisfying conclusion to a sprawling saga, with praise clustering around its attention to character and the emotional consequences of earlier events. The action earns approval, but the reviews tend to credit its impact to the audience’s investment in the Avengers rather than spectacle alone. Performances are another strength: Robert Downey Jr.’s mixture of humour and gravity draws particular notice, while Chris Evans benefits from renewed attention to Captain America.

The disagreement concerns how much that satisfaction amounts to beyond rewarding established fans. Some reviews find the complex storytelling cohesive and energetic; others see excessive length and a rigid structure. Radio Times objects to the broad Thor subplot, despite its positive verdict. The New Yorker is sharper about the lack of visual imagination, while The New York Times regards the film as fitting but unremarkable. The praise is widespread, but enthusiasm is far from uniform.

## Straight answers

**Is Avengers: Endgame worth watching?**

*Avengers: Endgame* is worth watching for anyone already attached to these characters, and we scored it 79. The Russos give the heroes time to be unhappy, and Robert Downey Jr. makes Tony Stark's weariness hard to dismiss. At 181 minutes, though, it asks for more patience than it always repays, and newcomers will find much of the emotional work has been done elsewhere.

**How long is Avengers: Endgame, and what is it rated?**

*Avengers: Endgame* runs 3h 01m and is rated PG-13 by the MPA in the US. It is an adventure and science fiction film.

**Where can I watch Avengers: Endgame in the US?**

*Avengers: Endgame* is streaming on Disney+ in the US, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from $3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.

**How violent or frightening is Avengers: Endgame, and is it suitable for children?**

*Avengers: Endgame* carries a UK 12A certificate, so it is an action adventure with fantasy violence rather than anything gruesome. The film dwells on loss and grief more than most superhero films, which younger children may find heavy going over three hours. Older children and teenagers who know the series should be comfortable with it.

**How does Avengers: Endgame compare to Avengers: Infinity War?**

*Avengers: Endgame* is the quieter, more personal film, giving its heroes room to grieve where [*Avengers: Infinity War*](https://film.one/film/avengers-infinity-war) spends its energy on a crowded, exciting gathering and a formidable adversary. The earlier film is the more consistently exciting; the later one is the more moving, and the longer. Both expect you to arrive already caring about these people.

**Do you need to have seen the other Marvel Cinematic Universe films before Avengers: Endgame?**

*Avengers: Endgame* is not a place to start; it follows directly from [*Avengers: Infinity War*](https://film.one/film/avengers-infinity-war) and expects familiarity with the wider Marvel Cinematic Universe. The screenplay leans hard on the attachment it assumes you bring, so without it too many scenes rely on recognition rather than fresh writing. This is a conclusion for the already committed.

**What should I watch after Avengers: Endgame?**

After *Avengers: Endgame*, try [*Logan*](https://film.one/film/logan) (2017, Fi1m 83): Another superhero reckoning that gives exhaustion and regret room beside the violence. Then [*Seven Samurai*](https://film.one/film/seven-samurai) (1954, Fi1m 95): For the pleasure of distinct personalities making collective action matter; and [*The Incredibles*](https://film.one/film/the-incredibles) (2004, Fi1m 88): Superhero teamwork, family friction and action with a much clearer sense of space.

**What order should I watch the Marvel Cinematic Universe films in?**

Release order is the safe choice for Marvel Cinematic Universe, and it is the order [our collection page](https://film.one/collections/marvel-cinematic-universe) lists them in. *Avengers: Endgame* is number 7 of the 9 Marvel Cinematic Universe titles on Fi1m; before it comes [*Avengers: Infinity War*](https://film.one/film/avengers-infinity-war) and after it [*VisionQuest*](https://film.one/tv/visionquest). [The full order.](https://film.one/collections/marvel-cinematic-universe.md)

### Reviews we read (10)

- **The Guardian**, Peter Bradshaw (5/5): The climactic instalment is a galvanising victory lap and ultimate love letter to superfans. The final battle is giddily cathartic because it prioritises character development over plot and spectacle. [Read](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/apr/27/avengers-endgame-film-review)
- **Empire**, Helen O'Hara (90/100, inferred): The critic calls it an intensely satisfying piece of blockbuster filmmaking that deals with emotional fallout and character development after the events of Infinity War. They single out the big final action sequence and moments of giddy delight and emotion as highlights. [Read](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/avengers-endgame-review/)
- **Radio Times**, Huw Fullerton (★★★★): The critic praises the film's hugely ambitious and entertaining take on the MCU's sprawling continuity as a victory lap that refocuses on underserved characters like Captain America. They single out Chris Evans' standout moments for praise while noting flaws like a broad Thor subplot and excessive length. [Read](https://www.radiotimes.com/tv/sci-fi/avengers-endgame-review/)
- **The Times**, Tom Shone (★★★): The directing team finds the right vein of showmanship and self-deprecation to bring the saga to a satisfying close with a time-warp plot that revisits previous films. The Avengers has always been bright and eager to please but lacks thematic heft. [Read](https://www.thetimes.com/culture/article/avengers-endgame-review-a-monster-marvel-finale-tqr9nlxgc)
- **The Hollywood Reporter**, Todd McCarthy: The three-hour epic provides a somber but entertaining sense of closure to the saga as the Avengers battle Thanos once more. The critic singles out the strong character acting, particularly Robert Downey Jr.'s inspired serio-comic turn as Iron Man. [Read](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/avengers-endgame-review-1203971/)
- **The New Yorker**, Richard Brody: The critic praises the performances, especially Robert Downey Jr.'s, but faults the film's bloated length, lack of visual imagination, and rigid structure, noting it fails to deliver on its potential. [Read](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/the-front-row/review-what-avengers-endgame-could-have-been)
- **The New York Times**, A.O. Scott: The critic finds the film a fitting but unremarkable capstone to the MCU, praising its evocation of fan participation and inclusivity while questioning its overall value and calling it a monument to adequacy. [Read](https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/movies/avengers-endgame-review.html)
- **Den of Geek** (5/5): The critic calls it brilliant, groundbreaking, and a triumph that delivers everything fans want. It praises the film's emotional depth, cohesive storytelling across its complexity, and strong character arcs for the core Avengers. [Read](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/avengers-endgame-review-a-totally-triumphant-payoff/)
- **Collider**, Matt Goldberg (A-): The critic calls it an exhilarating epic that pays off the investment in characters with thrilling, hilarious, and powerful moments, praising the Russos' propulsive narrative and focus on character-driven stakes over mere fan service. They single out the weight of loss and consequences, and how it serves as a fitting final chapter without feeling like a victory parade. [Read](https://collider.com/avengers-endgame-review/)
- **The Wrap**, Alonso Duralde: The critic calls the film a skillful popcorn epic that delivers satisfying fan service and rare catharsis in the MCU saga. He singles out the climactic battle sequence, including a pointed all-female hero moment, for its adrenaline and efficient handling of the large ensemble. [Read](https://www.thewrap.com/avengers-endgame-film-review-mcu-robert-downey-jr-chris-evans/)

## Details

- **Director:** Joe Russo, Anthony Russo
- **Director:** Joe Russo, Anthony Russo
- **Screenplay:** Stephen McFeely, Christopher Markus
- **Cinematography:** Trent Opaloch
- **Editor:** Jeffrey Ford, Matthew Schmidt
- **Music:** Alan Silvestri
- **Production design:** Charles Wood
- **Costume design:** Judianna Makovsky, Joseph Richard Collins, Myra N. Foy
- **Producer:** Kevin Feige
- **Cast:** Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark / Iron Man; Chris Evans as Steve Rogers / Captain America; Mark Ruffalo as Bruce Banner / Hulk; Chris Hemsworth as Thor; Scarlett Johansson as Natasha Romanoff / Black Widow; Jeremy Renner as Clint Barton / Hawkeye; Josh Brolin as Thanos; Don Cheadle as James Rhodes / War Machine
- **Runtime:** 3h 01m
- **Certificate (MPA):** PG-13
- **Release (the US):** 26 April 2019
- **Genres:** Adventure, Science Fiction, Action
- **Part of:** [Marvel Cinematic Universe](https://film.one/collections/marvel-cinematic-universe.md) · 7 of 9
- **Budget:** $356 million
- **Box office:** $2.80 billion
- **Trailer:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2NAh3CIdig

## Where to watch in the US

- Disney+: streaming, uhd
- Amazon Prime Video: rent $3.99, uhd
- Apple TV: rent $3.99, hd
- Amazon Prime Video: buy $19.99, uhd
- Apple TV: buy $19.99, hd

*Checked 2026-09-14.*

Also available in: AE, AR, AT, AU, BE, BG, BR, CA, CH, CL, CO, CZ, DE, DK, EC, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HK, HR, HU, IE, IL, IN, IS, IT, JP, KR, LT, MX, NL, NO, NZ, PA, PE, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SG, SI, TR, UA, US, ZA. Add `?region=XX` to this URL for another country.

## Awards

- Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie 2019: Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie (won)
- MTV Movie Award for Best Villain 2019: MTV Movie Award for Best Villain (won)

## If you liked this

- *Logan* (2017), Fi1m 83: Another superhero reckoning that gives exhaustion and regret room beside the violence. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/logan.md)
- *Seven Samurai* (1954), Fi1m 95: For the pleasure of distinct personalities making collective action matter. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/seven-samurai.md)
- *The Incredibles* (2004), Fi1m 88: Superhero teamwork, family friction and action with a much clearer sense of space. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-incredibles.md)
- *Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon* (2000), Fi1m 90: An adventure where long-held feelings make the fighting worth paying attention to. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/crouching-tiger-hidden-dragon.md)
- *Serenity* (2005), Fi1m 77: A quarrelsome spacefaring crew supplies the humour and loyalty between action sequences. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/serenity.md)

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Canonical: https://film.one/film/avengers-endgame