--- title: "Blue Thunder" year: 1983 kind: "film" canonical: "https://film.one/film/blue-thunder" fi1m_id: "blue-thunder" imdb_id: "tt0085255" tmdb_id: 6341 wikidata_id: "Q1171141" fi1m_score: 71 critics_score: 63 critics_reviews: 8 published: "2026-10-04T18:28:39.302558+00:00" updated: "2026-10-04T18:28:39.880601+00:00" region: "HR" licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL." --- # Blue Thunder (1983) Directed by John Badham · 1h 50m · Drama, Action, Thriller ## Identity Blue Thunder - **Canonical:** https://film.one/film/blue-thunder - **Type:** Film - **Fi1m ID:** blue-thunder - **IMDb ID:** tt0085255 - **TMDB ID:** 6341 - **Wikidata ID:** Q1171141 - **Same entity:** https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085255/, https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/6341, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1171141 **Fi1m score: 71** · Critics 63 from 8 reviews *In a sentence:* A surveillance helicopter has no business being this enjoyable to watch > *Blue Thunder* is an entertaining thriller with more confidence in its helicopter than its characters. John Badham’s aerial action earns the evening; the predictable writing keeps it from becoming anything more troubling. ## Synopsis Murphy (Roy Scheider) carries out surveillance work, and a high-tech helicopter offers an array of gadgets for watching people from the air. Braddock (Warren Oates), Lymangood (Daniel Stern) and Cochrane (Malcolm McDowell) are among the figures involved around him. The aircraft gives its operators the means to gather information about people below, making the equipment itself central to Murphy’s work. His task unfolds around a machine whose capabilities raise questions about how much power its users should have over the people they observe. ## Review John Badham’s *Blue Thunder* is a good action thriller whose writing cannot match its helicopter work. Its surveillance equipment gives the film a worthwhile subject: how much power we are prepared to put in the hands of people watching us. The flying is so enjoyable that the question can become easy to forget. That limits the film, but there is still a satisfying evening here for anyone who likes action performed with evident skill. The film is strongest when John A. Alonzo’s photography lets us appreciate the skill of the helicopter work. There is pleasure in being able to follow a machine in flight, judge its movement and feel that the people handling it know exactly what they are doing. We were gripped by the flying, even when the writing had given us little reason to feel anxious. The practical effects and aerial footage supply much of the excitement, and they are the clearest reason to watch. Roy Scheider gives Murphy enough weight to keep the human side from disappearing altogether. He is persuasive even when the screenplay has done little to earn our interest in the character, and that makes a difference in a film so absorbed by its hardware. Warren Oates gives Braddock welcome bite, finding humour and irritation in material that can otherwise seem merely functional. His presence helps keep the dialogue scenes from feeling like delays before the next bout of flying. Don Jakoby and Dan O’Bannon keep the story moving, but the psychology is thin and the turns are too easy to anticipate. That matters because a thriller about surveillance needs us to care about judgement: who uses the equipment, what they think it permits, and how readily they excuse themselves. Here, the people can feel as though they have been assigned enough personality to get the next stretch of action under way. We wanted the script to make their decisions harder to take for granted. Frank Morriss and Edward M. Abroms edit with a useful sense of urgency, keeping the film from spending too long on its weaker material. The pace makes the implausibilities easier to accept while we are watching, though it does not make them any more convincing afterwards. Arthur B. Rubinstein’s music also helps the action along. Its contribution is effective, but the excitement of the machinery is already so persuasive that the film scarcely needs further encouragement in that direction. The gadgets present a difficulty that the film never quite settles. Their capacity for surveillance ought to make us uneasy, yet so much effort goes into making the helicopter impressive that admiration comes easily. We would have liked more time spent on why people accept such equipment, and less confidence that its dangers are self-evident. The political concern is welcome, but it remains underdeveloped beside the attention lavished on the aircraft. At 110 minutes, it is a reasonable choice when the appetite is for machinery, danger and a dependable leading actor. Anyone hoping for a searching examination of surveillance should lower those expectations before starting. We recommend it to action enthusiasts with that reservation, rather than as a thriller likely to win over the reluctant. Leave time afterwards to argue about why the surveillance equipment was so much fun. *Fi1m score 71, published 4 October 2026.* ## What the critics say The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Blue Thunder, with praise clustering around the helicopter action rather than the writing. Critics repeatedly single out the flying footage, practical effects and stunt work as reasons to stay with an implausible story, while the performances earn credit for keeping it entertaining. Slant Magazine offers the most enthusiastic reading, finding a subversive political agenda beneath the action and singling out Warren Oates for praise. The main divide is over how much the script’s weaknesses matter. Variety finds enough momentum in the streamlined storytelling to overlook thin character psychology; other reviews flag weak plotting and predictability as more substantial limitations. The scores range from enthusiastic to negative, though most sit in the mixed band. The New Yorker supplies the clearest negative dissent, but the available material does not establish its specific objections; two further reviews also lack accessible verdicts. ## Straight answers **Is Blue Thunder worth watching?** *Blue Thunder* is worth watching for action enthusiasts who enjoy skilful aerial work, and we score it 71 out of 100. We find the helicopter footage gripping and Roy Scheider a dependable lead, but the predictable writing and thin characterisation limit its promise as a thriller about surveillance. **How long is Blue Thunder, and what is it rated?** *Blue Thunder* runs 1h 50m. It is a drama and action film. **Where can I watch Blue Thunder in Croatia?** *Blue Thunder* is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from HRK 3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service. **How violent or frightening is Blue Thunder, and is it suitable for children?** *Blue Thunder* carries a UK 15 certificate, so it is not suitable for children under 15. The aerial action supplies danger and tension, but we find it exciting rather than deeply unsettling; the certificate remains the clearest guide for families, rather than an assurance that its violence or adult material will suit every older teenager. **How does Blue Thunder compare to The Conversation?** *Blue Thunder* is the better fit for aerial action, but we recommend [*The Conversation*](https://film.one/film/the-conversation) more strongly for suspense and its attention to the person doing the surveillance. The helicopter thriller makes watching people look enjoyable without examining the consequences deeply enough; *The Conversation* makes repeated listening gripping and loneliness painful, though a few plot decisions feel over-arranged. **What should I watch after Blue Thunder?** After *Blue Thunder*, try [*The Conversation*](https://film.one/film/the-conversation) (1974, Fi1m 92): Surveillance becomes a queasy occupation, with more patience for the person listening. Then [*The Lives of Others*](https://film.one/film/the-lives-of-others) (2006, Fi1m 84): A more patient examination of surveillance and the people paid to practise it. ### Reviews we read (8) - **Slant Magazine**, Budd Wilkins (4/5): Wilkins praises the film as a rollicking action picture with a subversive political agenda. He singles out Warren Oates’s performance and the film’s energetic practical effects and flying footage. [Read](https://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/blue-thunder-4k-uhd-blu-ray-review-john-badham/) - **Variety**, Variety Staff (75/100, inferred): Variety finds the film implausible but highly enjoyable. It praises the streamlined script’s momentum, noting that the thin character psychology barely matters. [Read](https://variety.com/1982/film/reviews/blue-thunder-1200425586/) - **Empire**, William Thomas (65/100, inferred): The review finds the weak script redeemed by entertaining performances and lively action. It particularly praises John Badham’s stunt work with the helicopter. [Read](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/blue-thunder-review/) - **The New York Times** (64/100, inferred): The review's verdict is unavailable because the article could not be accessed. Its praised or criticized elements are likewise not visible. [Read](https://www.nytimes.com/1983/05/13/movies/blue-thunder-a-helicopter.html) - **Time Out**, NRo (64/100, inferred): The page identifies itself as a review, but the critic’s verdict is unavailable. The visible description introduces Frank Murphy and his surveillance work, without revealing what the critic praises or criticizes. [Read](https://www.timeout.com/movies/blue-thunder) - **Radio Times**, Joanna Berry (3/5): Berry calls it a slick, somewhat predictable adventure. She singles out its high-tech super-helicopter and surveillance gadgets. [Read](https://www.radiotimes.com/movie-guide/b-89rn2k/blue-thunder/) - **The New Yorker**, Pauline Kael (35/100, inferred): Kael’s review is critical of the film. I can’t verify from the available text what she singles out for praise or complaint. [Read](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1983/06/13/wrapping-it-up-2) - **Den of Geek**, Mark Pickavance (3/5): Pickavance considers Blue Thunder an above-average action film, though its plot and Blu-ray presentation have notable flaws. He especially praises the spectacular, skillful helicopter flying and the principled ending. [Read](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/blue-thunder-blu-ray-review/) ## Details - **Director:** John Badham - **Director:** John Badham - **Screenplay:** Dan O'Bannon, Don Jakoby - **Cinematography:** John A. Alonzo - **Editor:** Frank Morriss, Edward M. Abroms - **Music:** Arthur B. Rubinstein - **Producer:** Gordon Carroll - **Cast:** Roy Scheider as Murphy; Warren Oates as Braddock; Candy Clark as Kate; Daniel Stern as Lymangood; Paul Roebling as Icelan; David Sheiner as Fletcher; Joe Santos as Montoya; Malcolm McDowell as Cochrane - **Runtime:** 1h 50m - **First release (Germany):** 5 February 1983 - **Genres:** Drama, Action, Thriller - **Budget:** $22 million - **Box office:** $42 million - **Trailer:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI_GoXZqoYs ## Where to watch in Croatia - Amazon Prime Video: rent HRK 3.99, hd - Amazon Prime Video: buy HRK 7.99, sd *Checked 2026-10-04.* Also available in: AT, AU, BE, BG, BR, CA, CL, CO, DE, ES, GB, HR, IE, IN, IT, JP, LT, MX, NL, PT, RS, US. Add `?region=XX` to this URL for another country. ## Awards - Academy Awards 1984: Best Film Editing (nominated) ## If you liked this - *The Conversation* (1974), Fi1m 92: Surveillance becomes a queasy occupation, with more patience for the person listening. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-conversation.md) - *Police Story* (1985): For physical action whose precision makes the danger feel uncomfortably close. - *The Lives of Others* (2006), Fi1m 84: A more patient examination of surveillance and the people paid to practise it. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-lives-of-others.md) - *The Taking of Pelham One Two Three* (1974): Another brisk thriller where capable actors make pressured professionals worth spending time with. - *Unstoppable* (2010): More heavy machinery, brisk storytelling and professionals trying to keep disaster under control. --- © Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Canonical: https://film.one/film/blue-thunder