---
title: "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince: the reviews"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince/reviews"
title_page: "https://film.one/film/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince"
critics_score: 64
critics_reviews: 19
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009): what the critics said

Critics' score 64 from 19 reviews: 10 positive, 7 mixed, 2 negative.

Most critics find this a well-made, more grown-up entry, and the praise clusters in two places. The craft departments get the warmest notices: the cinematography, production design and score are singled out repeatedly, and the Quidditch sequences are widely mentioned as highlights. The other constant is the supporting cast. Jim Broadbent’s Slughorn and Alan Rickman’s Snape are named as standouts across reviews that agree on little else, and David Yates is credited with a calmer, more human film that puts romance and character ahead of spectacle.

The split is over whether it works on its own. A large group of mixed reviews call it set-up for the finale: thin on plot, rushed at key moments and long for what it delivers. The young leads divide opinion sharply, and the spread is wide. The New York Times and The New Yorker are the harshest, seeing series fatigue and too much solemnity, while Collider, Den of Geek and The Playlist rank it above every previous entry.

## The Telegraph — Sukhdev Sandhu

Rating 4/5. 15 July 2009. 

The film stands head and shoulders above the previous five and is terrific entertainment in its own right, with liberated performances from the leads and a genuine emotional tug. It is confident, muscular and comic.

[Read the review](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/films/2016/12/29/harry-potter-half-blood-prince-review/)

## The Guardian — Xan Brooks

Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 4 July 2009. 

The film is a solidly constructed addition to the series with fine effects, though the growing-up juvenile leads expose a weakness in the franchise. Director David Yates handles the cards well despite some ungainliness.

[Read the review](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2009/jul/04/harry-potter-half-blood-prince-review)

## The Hollywood Reporter — Kirk Honeycutt

Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 5 July 2009. 

The review highlights an air of foreboding over Hogwarts as the confrontation with Voldemort looms, with romantic subplots among the students providing some relief amid the darkness. It praises the technical contributions from composer, cinematographer, and designer while noting the hurried pacing and weakened position of the protagonist in the climax.

[Read the review](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/harry-potter-blood-prince-film-93330/)

## Time Out — Wally Hammond

Rating 3 out of 5 stars. 9 July 2009. 

The critic finds it a more human, less frenzied affair focused on romance and character moments rather than action. Praises the director’s restraint and the human details, intimacy, and performances.

[Read the review](https://www.timeout.com/movies/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-1)

## Variety — Todd McCarthy

Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 5 July 2009. 

Todd McCarthy praises the film as dazzlingly well made and a formidable entry that shifts effectively into life-or-death drama with increased grit and maturity. He highlights David Yates’ confident direction, Steve Kloves’ screenplay, and strong production values while noting a lack of dramatic modulation.

[Read the review](https://variety.com/2009/film/features/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-1200506934/)

## Empire — Angie Errigo

Fi1m's normalised score 60/100 (inferred from the text). 8 July 2009. 

The film struggles to blend impending doom with teen romance and humour in an overlong story with rushed plot points; standout spectacle from cinematography and production design is memorable, though acting is variable.

[Read the review](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/harry-potter-half-blood-prince-review/)

## Evening Standard

Fi1m's normalised score 60/100 (inferred from the text). 

The film is a slick but curiously unemotional effects juggernaut with hollow teen romance; veteran actors like Broadbent and Gambon provide emotional weight, while kinetic Quidditch and gorgeous visuals distract from pacing and length issues.

[Read the review](https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/first-review-harry-potter-and-the-halfblood-prince-7415332.html)

## Screen Daily

Fi1m's normalised score 60/100 (inferred from the text). 6 July 2009. 

Even with ample runtime, it struggles to make a consistently thrilling experience, more a series of gentle interludes and set-up. Technically superior and well-made, with strong individual sequences and performances, but may feel awkward in blockbuster season.

[Read the review](https://www.screendaily.com/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince/5003198.article)

## Slant Magazine — Nick Schager

Fi1m's normalised score 55/100 (inferred from the text). 14 July 2009. 

The film is criticized for its thin narrative momentum and perfunctory handling of key events, functioning mainly as a placeholder in the series. It is praised for its focus on the romantic plights of the teen characters and strong supporting performances, particularly Jim Broadbent as Slughorn.

[Read the review](https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince/)

## Los Angeles Times — Kenneth Turan

Fi1m's normalised score 50/100 (inferred from the text). 14 July 2009. 

Kenneth Turan calls the film well-crafted and consistent with the series’ high standards of fidelity to the source, but notes it can feel hard to endure at times. He singles out Alan Rickman’s Snape as a standout amid the professional execution.

[Read the review](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-archives-harry-potter-half-blood-prince-review-20170626-story.html)

## The Independent

Fi1m's normalised score 50/100 (inferred from the text). 18 July 2009. 

The film lacks a satisfying standalone plot and feels like setup for the finale, with flat teen romances and Harry sidelined; production design and incidental magic are wondrous, and Quidditch provides highlights.

[Read the review](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/harry-potter-and-the-halfblood-prince-david-yates-153-mins-12a-frozen-river-courtney-hunt-97-mins-15-1752168.html)

## The New Yorker — Anthony Lane

Fi1m's normalised score 40/100 (inferred from the text). 15 July 2009. 

Anthony Lane finds the installment overly solemn and weighed down by hormones and dark tones, stripping away the earlier whimsy. He criticizes the heavy stylistic choices and lack of genuine fun while praising isolated moments of wit.

[Read the review](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/07/27/gray-skies-2)

## The New York Times — Manohla Dargis

Fi1m's normalised score 30/100 (inferred from the text). 15 July 2009. 

The film shows signs of series fatigue as the young leads struggle to convey depth amid growing stakes. Manohla Dargis notes strong supporting turns, particularly Alan Rickman’s Snape, but finds the central performances lacking in magic.

[Read the review](https://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/15/movies/15harry.html)

## Collider — Matt Goldberg

Rating A. 14 July 2009. 

The film is a masterpiece and the best in the series yet, a perfect balance of plot progression and teenage romance that feels like the calm before the storm. The critic singles out the mature, lived-in performances of the young leads and the technical mastery of the Hogwarts world.

[Read the review](https://collider.com/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-review/)

## Den of Geek — Rupert de

Rating 4 out of 5. 8 July 2009. 

The critic calls it a corker and possibly the best in the series so far, praising its strong character development as the leads mature into young adults and the emotional handling of key story beats. They single out Helena Bonham Carter's sensational performance as Bellatrix Lestrange and note that character-focused storytelling trumps special effects.

[Read the review](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-review/)

## The Playlist — Rodrigo Perez

Fi1m's normalised score 85/100 (inferred from the text). 14 July 2009. 

Yates delivers an exhilarating return to form and the best entry in the series, with stylish visuals, emotional resonance, and effective condensation of the book's rich plotting.

[Read the review](https://theplaylist.net/review-harry-potter-6-stylis-20090714/)

## Eye for Film — Robyn Jankel

Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 13 July 2009. 

The film is the darkest yet but also the funniest thanks to strong comic performances and visual flair; it delivers satisfying scares, strong casting, and emotional depth while appealing strongly to fans.

[Read the review](http://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-film-review-by-robyn-jankel)

## /Film — David Chen

Rating 7/10. 17 July 2009. 

The critic finds the film fails to stand fully on its own as an adventure movie due to uneven pacing and excessive or insufficient exposition, though it works well for series fans.

[Read the review](https://www.slashfilm.com/504601/harry-potter-through-fresh-eyes-harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-movie-review/)

## NME — NME

Fi1m's normalised score 50/100 (inferred from the text). 8 July 2009. 

The review describes the film as a lengthy modern blockbuster heavy on CGI spectacle and teenage romance, comparing its focus on sexual awakening and nihilism to an episode of Skins. It praises Jim Broadbent's likeable turn as Slughorn and the stunning opening sequence but criticises the thin plot.

[Read the review](https://www.nme.com/blogs/the-movies-blog/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince-film-review-its-like-skins-with-wizards-46863)

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Our review: https://film.one/film/harry-potter-and-the-half-blood-prince.md