---
title: "Incredibles 2"
year: 2018
kind: "film"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/incredibles-2"
fi1m_id: "incredibles-2"
imdb_id: "tt3606756"
tmdb_id: 260513
wikidata_id: "Q24832112"
fi1m_score: 80
critics_score: 77
critics_reviews: 29
published: "2026-10-03T00:29:04.123738+00:00"
updated: "2026-10-03T00:29:04.753746+00:00"
region: "AT"
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Incredibles 2 (2018)

Directed by Brad Bird · 1h 58m · FSK 6 · Action, Adventure, Animation, Family

## Identity

Incredibles 2

- **Canonical:** https://film.one/film/incredibles-2
- **Type:** Film
- **Fi1m ID:** incredibles-2
- **IMDb ID:** tt3606756
- **TMDB ID:** 260513
- **Wikidata ID:** Q24832112
- **Same entity:** https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3606756/, https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/260513, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q24832112

**Fi1m score: 80** · Critics 77 from 29 reviews

*In a sentence:* The baby has superpowers, which seems an unreasonable addition to the usual childcare arrangements

> Brad Bird makes a funny, deftly staged family adventure whose parenting troubles are more engaging than its villain. The familiar plotting is a limitation, but Holly Hunter and the physical comedy keep it lively.

## Synopsis

Helen Parr / Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) takes the lead in the family’s superhero work while Bob Parr / Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) takes charge at home. His job is to keep the household running, which means caring for Violet Parr (Sarah Vowell), Dashiell ‘Dash’ Parr (Huck Milner) and baby Jack-Jack Parr (Eli Fucile). Bob wants to manage without Helen, but each child brings demands he has to learn to handle. Helen faces superhero emergencies while the new division of labour puts Bob’s parenting to the test. Jack-Jack’s powers make the childcare more complicated still.

## Review

Brad Bird gives *Incredibles 2* a useful change of routine: Helen takes on the superhero work and Bob looks after the children. The pleasure comes from watching people who already know each other discover how much they have underestimated each other’s jobs. It is a funny, assured family adventure, and we recommend it with a warning about the familiar villain plot. Bird, who also writes, is much better at making the domestic arrangement awkward than at making the danger surprising.

Holly Hunter gives Helen warmth, impatience and an audible enjoyment of the superhero work. She sounds pleased to get on with the job, and avoids turning every line into a declaration of independence. Craig T. Nelson makes Bob’s difficulties at home funny without making the children seem like punishment. His heroic confidence is poorly suited to the childcare, but Nelson keeps enough affection in his voice for Bob’s efforts to remain endearing even when the joke is familiar.

Mahyar Abousaeedi and Erik Smitt’s cinematography makes the action easy to follow, even when Helen’s body is doing things that would defeat a live-action stunt team. The runaway-monorail rescue is a good example: the pleasure lies in following her changing solutions to a clear physical problem. Bird builds the scene around what Helen can do, and her movements keep producing ideas. Stephen Schaffer’s editing gives each manoeuvre enough time to register before moving to the next.

Ralph Eggleston’s production design gives the movement a clean, retro-modernist setting. The surroundings have enough character to remain interesting when nobody is saving anybody, which matters in a film that spends so much time with a family. Michael Giacchino’s music keeps the action buoyant, although it makes less of an impression than the images it accompanies. The visual style also helps hold the domestic comedy and the superhero rescues together, without making either feel as though it belongs in a different film.

Jack-Jack’s encounter with a raccoon shows how well Bird can organise a gag. We laughed aloud at it: a baby and a raccoon make a welcome change from adults taking superhero business seriously. Bird allows the ridiculous situation to develop before adding another complication, and knows when to stop explaining and let the movement carry the joke. The sequence needs no help from the larger plot, and its small scale makes the care taken over it especially pleasing.

Bird’s writing is less inventive once the villain plot takes over, and the predictable turns keep the film from being as satisfying as its action. The ideas about family duties can also arrive with more explanation than the scenes need, as though we might otherwise miss the point of Bob’s difficulties. By superhero standards, though, such clear staging and such pleasure in physical movement remain worth having. At 118 minutes, it could stand a trim, particularly where the story insists on explaining itself. We would choose it for a family evening, provided nobody is expecting the villain to be the main attraction.

*Fi1m score 80, published 3 October 2026.*

## What the critics say

Most critics welcome Incredibles 2 as a funny, energetic sequel, with praise clustering around its inventive animation, clearly staged action and recognisable family tensions. Elastigirl’s superhero work and Mr. Incredible’s childcare duties give the role reversal both comic and dramatic value. Jack-Jack’s chaotic powers are a recurring favourite, particularly the raccoon sequence, whose physical comedy appeals even to reviewers with reservations elsewhere. The retro design and sharp dialogue also draw approval.

The main division concerns how much the sequel adds to the original. The Guardian finds it superior, while Variety sees an entertaining but formulaic replay with too little emotional impact. Between those positions, reservations centre on familiar plotting, a weak villain and ideas that receive less attention than the action. The spread runs from enthusiasm to mixed approval rather than outright rejection: even the less persuaded critics generally find something to enjoy in the family scenes and visual invention.

## Straight answers

**Is Incredibles 2 worth watching?**

*Incredibles 2* is worth watching for its funny family dynamics and clearly staged superhero action, and we score it 80 out of 100. We recommend it for a family evening, especially for Jack-Jack’s physical comedy and Holly Hunter’s lively Helen, though the predictable villain plot and unnecessary explanations make it longer than it needs to be.

**How long is Incredibles 2, and what is it rated?**

*Incredibles 2* runs 1h 58m and is rated 6 by the FSK in Austria. It is an action and adventure film.

**Where can I watch Incredibles 2 in Austria?**

*Incredibles 2* is streaming on Disney+ in Austria, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from €3.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.

**How does Incredibles 2 compare to The Iron Giant?**

*Incredibles 2* offers lively superhero rescues and parenting comedy, while [*The Iron Giant*](https://film.one/film/the-iron-giant) finds humour, tenderness and danger in a boy’s friendship with a robot. We favour *The Iron Giant* for emotional involvement, despite its sometimes oversimplified adults; *Incredibles 2* suits a family evening built around physical comedy, though its villain plot is less satisfying than its domestic troubles.

**What should I watch after Incredibles 2?**

After *Incredibles 2*, try [*The Iron Giant*](https://film.one/film/the-iron-giant) (1999, Fi1m 88): Brad Bird finds warmth and danger in another child’s unusual companion. Then [*Monsieur Hulot's Holiday*](https://film.one/film/monsieur-hulots-holiday) (1953, Fi1m 86): Physical comedy built from patient observation and movements worth watching closely; and [*Wolf Children*](https://film.one/film/wolf-children) (2012, Fi1m 81): Unusual children make parenting difficult in this quieter, more sorrowful animation.

### Reviews we read (29)

- **The Guardian**, Mark Kermode (95/100, inferred): Kermode says the sequel surpasses the original and wins him over. He especially praises Jack-Jack’s slapstick, calling its physical gags brilliantly executed and uproariously funny. [Read](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jul/15/incredibles-2-review-mark-kermode)
- **Vulture**, David Edelstein (90/100, inferred): Edelstein finds Incredibles 2 delightful and praises Brad Bird’s stylish, nimble superhero filmmaking. He especially singles out the Jack-Jack and raccoon slapstick sequence for its comic timing. [Read](https://www.vulture.com/2018/06/incredibles-2-review.html)
- **RogerEbert.com**, Brian Tallerico (3.5/4): Tallerico gives the sequel a positive verdict, finding it worth the long wait. He singles out its inventive animation and family dynamics for praise. [Read](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/incredibles-2-2018)
- **IndieWire**, David Ehrlich (B+): Ehrlich finds the sequel rocky at first but ultimately great, praising its character-driven action and its blend of family life with superhero spectacle. He especially singles out Holly Hunter’s soulful performance and the exhilarating action sequences. [Read](https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/incredibles-2-review-brad-bird-pixar-1201973376/)
- **Evening Standard**, Matthew Norman (4/5): Norman finds the sequel witty and charming, with its gender-role reversal giving the superhero story a fresh angle. He especially praises Brad Bird’s smart, funny script and the comic moments involving Jack-Jack. [Read](https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/incredibles-2-review-superhero-sequel-wittily-upends-gender-stereotypes-a3886486.html)
- **Los Angeles Times**, Kenneth Turan (80/100, inferred): Turan finds the sequel sparkling and crowd-pleasing, though it lacks the original’s shock of novelty. He especially praises the returning blend of sharp dialogue, comic adventure, and believable family dynamics. [Read](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-incredibles-2-review-20180611-story.html)
- **Radio Times**, Trevor Johnston (80/100, inferred): The review presents the sequel as delightful, irresistible entertainment. It highlights the superhero family's role reversal and return to battling super-villains. [Read](https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/incredibles-2-review-irresistible-entertainment/)
- **Time Out**, Tomris Laffly (4/5): The review presents the sequel as spirited and engaging. It singles out the humorous contrast between superheroics and the advanced skills parenthood demands. [Read](https://www.timeout.com/movies/incredibles-2)
- **Total Film**, Jamie Graham (4/5): Graham finds the sequel a terrific, energetic blast despite its less focused ideas and overly obvious messaging. He especially praises the inventive animation and the chaotic Jack-Jack-versus-raccoon sequence. [Read](https://www.gamesradar.com/incredibles-2-review/)
- **Empire**, John Nugent (75/100, inferred): Nugent finds it a gloriously fun, energetic family film despite an over-familiar setup and a weak villain. He especially praises the witty family moments and the film’s kinetic action. [Read](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/incredibles-2-review/)
- **Film Comment**, Jonathan Romney (75/100, inferred): Romney’s standfirst gives the sequel a clearly positive verdict. He singles out its elaborate motion and detail, alongside its smart writing. [Read](https://www.filmcomment.com/deep-focus-incredibles-2/)
- **Screen Daily**, Tim Grierson (70/100, inferred): The critic’s brief verdict is positive, saying the family continues to entertain and charm. The accessible text singles out that equal measure of entertainment and charm as the film’s strength. [Read](https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/incredibles-2-review/5129926.article)
- **The Hollywood Reporter**, Todd McCarthy (70/100, inferred): McCarthy finds the sequel entertaining and worth the wait, though not quite as successful as the original. He praises its wit, engaging family dynamics and retro design, while noting that Elastigirl’s action sequences become repetitive. [Read](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/incredibles-2-review-1118342/)
- **The New Yorker**, Anthony Lane (65/100, inferred): Lane finds the sequel enjoyable and expertly made, though it cannot match the original’s impact. He particularly praises its kinetic visual design and the period-modernist world Brad Bird creates. [Read](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/incredibles-2-reviewed-a-sequel-in-the-shadow-of-a-masterwork)
- **The New York Times** (64/100, inferred): The review's verdict cannot be established from the available page. No specific praise or complaint is accessible. [Read](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/movies/incredibles-2-review-disney-pixar.html)
- **Slant Magazine**, Keith Watson (2.5/4): Watson finds the sequel fleeter and funnier than the original, but ultimately disappointing as a familiar superhero movie. He praises Elastigirl’s fluid animated action and Jack-Jack’s comic chaos, while faulting the mechanical plotting and obvious villain reveal. [Read](https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/incredibles-2/)
- **Little White Lies**, Hannah Strong (4/3/3): Strong finds the sequel charming and warm, though it relies too heavily on nostalgia and brings little new. She praises its family focus and singles out the strobe-lit confrontation as a standout scene. [Read](https://lwlies.com/reviews/incredibles-2)
- **Variety**, Owen Gleiberman (45/100, inferred): Gleiberman finds the sequel entertaining but disappointing, replaying the original rather than building on it. He singles out Jack-Jack as its most crowd-pleasing feature, while criticizing the story’s formulaic quality and lack of emotional impact. [Read](https://variety.com/2018/film/reviews/incredibles-2-review-holly-hunter-1202837069/)
- **Consequence**, Clint Worthington (90/100, inferred): The critic calls it one of Pixar’s finest follow-ups and a bright, crowd-pleasing superhero film. He especially praises Brad Bird’s animation and action, and Elastigirl’s liberating turn at the story’s center. [Read](https://consequence.net/2018/06/film-review-incredibles-2/)
- **Digital Spy**, Ian Sandwell (90/100, inferred): The critic says the sequel is a thrilling, joyful adventure that more than justifies the wait. He praises its inventive action set pieces and singles out Jack-Jack as the film’s hilarious, adorable MVP. [Read](https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a860589/incredibles-2-review-jack-jack/)
- **/Film**, Ethan Anderton (90/100, inferred): Anderton praises the sequel as a superb superhero film centered on family, with strong character development. He especially singles out Elastigirl’s inventive, thrilling action sequences. [Read](https://www.slashfilm.com/559029/incredibles-2-spoiler-review/)
- **The Wrap**, Alonso Duralde (90/100, inferred): The critic finds the sequel rousing, funny, and richer than its predecessor, with a welcome reversal of traditional family roles. Jack-Jack’s chaotic powers and comic antics are singled out as a standout source of humor. [Read](https://www.thewrap.com/incredibles-2-film-review-holly-hunter-brad-bird-pixar/)
- **Eye for Film**, Andrew Robertson (88/100, inferred): The critic says the sequel meets high expectations and is a gleefully inventive success. They single out its gorgeous retro-futurist design and the crisp, surprising execution of its action and comedy. [Read](https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/incredibles-2-2018-film-review-by-andrew-robertson)
- **Polygon**, Karen Han (85/100, inferred): Han finds the sequel a lively, distinctive superhero film that stands up to its predecessor, though its broader scale makes it somewhat shakier. She especially praises the clear, inventive action staging and the fluid animation. [Read](https://www.polygon.com/2018/6/14/17464948/incredibles-2-review-pixar/)
- **Collider**, Matt Goldberg (B+): Goldberg calls the sequel worthwhile and one of Pixar’s finest, though it does not match the original’s heights. He especially praises the relatable, richer story of Mr. Incredible struggling to care for the children at home. [Read](https://collider.com/incredibles-2-review/)
- **NME** (80/100, inferred): The critic finds the sequel lively, charming and playful despite its lack of plot surprises. They especially praise Elastigirl’s action scenes and the film’s sharp family humor. [Read](https://www.nme.com/reviews/incredibles-2-film-review-2353967)
- **The Skinny**, Jamie Dunn (★★★★): The critic praises the sequel as a breakneck, entertaining film that overcomes Pixar’s sequel curse. They single out its lucid action, especially Elastigirl’s runaway-monorail rescue. [Read](https://www.theskinny.co.uk/film/new-releases/incredibles-2)
- **Paste**, Michael Burgin (9.1): Burgin finds the sequel messier and less compelling than the original, but still thoroughly enjoyable. He singles out the family interactions and Elastigirl’s resourceful heroics for praise. [Read](https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/the-incredibles/the-incredibles-2)
- **Den of Geek**, Ryan Lambie (3/5): Lambie finds the sequel entertaining but less fresh and ambitious than the original. He praises its vibrant animation and assured action, while noting that the story’s ideas and supporting characters feel underused. [Read](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/the-incredibles-2-review-a-solidly-fun-superhero-sequel/)

## Details

- **Director:** Brad Bird
- **Director:** Brad Bird
- **Writer:** Brad Bird
- **Cinematography:** Mahyar Abousaeedi, Erik Smitt
- **Editor:** Stephen Schaffer
- **Music:** Michael Giacchino, Cedric Baravaglio
- **Production design:** Ralph Eggleston
- **Producer:** Nicole Paradis Grindle, John Walker
- **Cast:** Craig T. Nelson as Bob Parr / Mr. Incredible (voice); Holly Hunter as Helen Parr / Elastigirl (voice); Sarah Vowell as Violet Parr (voice); Huck Milner as Dashiell 'Dash' Parr (voice); Catherine Keener as Evelyn Deavor (voice); Eli Fucile as Jack-Jack Parr (voice); Bob Odenkirk as Winston Deavor (voice); Samuel L. Jackson as Lucius Best / Frozone (voice)
- **Runtime:** 1h 58m
- **Certificate (FSK):** 6
- **Release (Austria):** 28 September 2018
- **Genres:** Action, Adventure, Animation, Family
- **Budget:** $200 million
- **Box office:** $1.24 billion
- **Trailer:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5qOzqD9Rms

## Where to watch in Austria

- Disney+: streaming, uhd
- Amazon Prime Video: rent €3.99, uhd
- Apple TV: rent €3.99, hd
- Apple TV: buy €9.99, sd
- Amazon Prime Video: buy €9.99, sd

*Checked 2026-10-03.*

Also available in: AE, AR, AT, AU, BE, BG, BR, CA, CH, CL, CO, CZ, DE, DK, EC, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HK, HR, HU, IE, IL, IS, IT, JP, KR, LT, MX, NL, NO, NZ, PA, PE, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SG, SI, TR, UA, US, ZA. Add `?region=XX` to this URL for another country.

## Awards

- Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie 2019: Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Animated Movie (won)
- Annie Award for Best Animated Feature 2018: Annie Award for Best Animated Feature (nominated)
- BAFTA Film Awards 2018: BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film (nominated)
- Critics' Choice Awards 2018: Best Animated Feature (nominated)

## If you liked this

- *The Iron Giant* (1999), Fi1m 88: Brad Bird finds warmth and danger in another child’s unusual companion. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-iron-giant.md)
- *Monsieur Hulot's Holiday* (1953), Fi1m 86: Physical comedy built from patient observation and movements worth watching closely. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/monsieur-hulots-holiday.md)
- *Wolf Children* (2012), Fi1m 81: Unusual children make parenting difficult in this quieter, more sorrowful animation. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/wolf-children.md)
- *The Castle* (1997): A family’s stubborn affection supplies the comedy, without anyone needing superpowers.
- *The Mitchells vs. the Machines* (2021), Fi1m 76: More family friction and inventive action, with considerably less restraint. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-mitchells-vs-the-machines.md)

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Canonical: https://film.one/film/incredibles-2