--- title: "Incredibles 2: the reviews" canonical: "https://film.one/film/incredibles-2/reviews" title_page: "https://film.one/film/incredibles-2" critics_score: 77 critics_reviews: 29 licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL." --- # Incredibles 2 (2018): what the critics said Critics' score 77 from 29 reviews: 23 positive, 6 mixed, 0 negative. Most critics welcome Incredibles 2 as a funny, energetic sequel, with praise clustering around its inventive animation, clearly staged action and recognisable family tensions. Elastigirl’s superhero work and Mr. Incredible’s childcare duties give the role reversal both comic and dramatic value. Jack-Jack’s chaotic powers are a recurring favourite, particularly the raccoon sequence, whose physical comedy appeals even to reviewers with reservations elsewhere. The retro design and sharp dialogue also draw approval. The main division concerns how much the sequel adds to the original. The Guardian finds it superior, while Variety sees an entertaining but formulaic replay with too little emotional impact. Between those positions, reservations centre on familiar plotting, a weak villain and ideas that receive less attention than the action. The spread runs from enthusiasm to mixed approval rather than outright rejection: even the less persuaded critics generally find something to enjoy in the family scenes and visual invention. ## The Guardian — Mark Kermode Fi1m's normalised score 95/100 (inferred from the text). 15 July 2018. Kermode says the sequel surpasses the original and wins him over. He especially praises Jack-Jack’s slapstick, calling its physical gags brilliantly executed and uproariously funny. [Read the review](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2018/jul/15/incredibles-2-review-mark-kermode) ## Vulture — David Edelstein Fi1m's normalised score 90/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. Edelstein finds Incredibles 2 delightful and praises Brad Bird’s stylish, nimble superhero filmmaking. He especially singles out the Jack-Jack and raccoon slapstick sequence for its comic timing. [Read the review](https://www.vulture.com/2018/06/incredibles-2-review.html) ## RogerEbert.com — Brian Tallerico Rating 3.5/4. 13 June 2018. Tallerico gives the sequel a positive verdict, finding it worth the long wait. He singles out its inventive animation and family dynamics for praise. [Read the review](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/incredibles-2-2018) ## IndieWire — David Ehrlich Rating B+. 11 June 2018. Ehrlich finds the sequel rocky at first but ultimately great, praising its character-driven action and its blend of family life with superhero spectacle. He especially singles out Holly Hunter’s soulful performance and the exhilarating action sequences. [Read the review](https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/incredibles-2-review-brad-bird-pixar-1201973376/) ## Evening Standard — Matthew Norman Rating 4/5. 13 July 2018. Norman finds the sequel witty and charming, with its gender-role reversal giving the superhero story a fresh angle. He especially praises Brad Bird’s smart, funny script and the comic moments involving Jack-Jack. [Read the review](https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/film/incredibles-2-review-superhero-sequel-wittily-upends-gender-stereotypes-a3886486.html) ## Los Angeles Times — Kenneth Turan Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. Turan finds the sequel sparkling and crowd-pleasing, though it lacks the original’s shock of novelty. He especially praises the returning blend of sharp dialogue, comic adventure, and believable family dynamics. [Read the review](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-incredibles-2-review-20180611-story.html) ## Radio Times — Trevor Johnston Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 11 July 2018. The review presents the sequel as delightful, irresistible entertainment. It highlights the superhero family's role reversal and return to battling super-villains. [Read the review](https://www.radiotimes.com/movies/incredibles-2-review-irresistible-entertainment/) ## Time Out — Tomris Laffly Rating 4/5. 13 June 2018. The review presents the sequel as spirited and engaging. It singles out the humorous contrast between superheroics and the advanced skills parenthood demands. [Read the review](https://www.timeout.com/movies/incredibles-2) ## Total Film — Jamie Graham Rating 4/5. 19 June 2018. Graham finds the sequel a terrific, energetic blast despite its less focused ideas and overly obvious messaging. He especially praises the inventive animation and the chaotic Jack-Jack-versus-raccoon sequence. [Read the review](https://www.gamesradar.com/incredibles-2-review/) ## Empire — John Nugent Fi1m's normalised score 75/100 (inferred from the text). 15 June 2018. Nugent finds it a gloriously fun, energetic family film despite an over-familiar setup and a weak villain. He especially praises the witty family moments and the film’s kinetic action. [Read the review](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/incredibles-2-review/) ## Film Comment — Jonathan Romney Fi1m's normalised score 75/100 (inferred from the text). Romney’s standfirst gives the sequel a clearly positive verdict. He singles out its elaborate motion and detail, alongside its smart writing. [Read the review](https://www.filmcomment.com/deep-focus-incredibles-2/) ## Screen Daily — Tim Grierson Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. The critic’s brief verdict is positive, saying the family continues to entertain and charm. The accessible text singles out that equal measure of entertainment and charm as the film’s strength. [Read the review](https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/incredibles-2-review/5129926.article) ## The Hollywood Reporter — Todd McCarthy Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. McCarthy finds the sequel entertaining and worth the wait, though not quite as successful as the original. He praises its wit, engaging family dynamics and retro design, while noting that Elastigirl’s action sequences become repetitive. [Read the review](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/incredibles-2-review-1118342/) ## The New Yorker — Anthony Lane Fi1m's normalised score 65/100 (inferred from the text). 18 June 2018. Lane finds the sequel enjoyable and expertly made, though it cannot match the original’s impact. He particularly praises its kinetic visual design and the period-modernist world Brad Bird creates. [Read the review](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/incredibles-2-reviewed-a-sequel-in-the-shadow-of-a-masterwork) ## The New York Times Fi1m's normalised score 64/100 (inferred from the text). 13 June 2018. The review's verdict cannot be established from the available page. No specific praise or complaint is accessible. [Read the review](https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/movies/incredibles-2-review-disney-pixar.html) ## Slant Magazine — Keith Watson Rating 2.5/4. 14 June 2018. Watson finds the sequel fleeter and funnier than the original, but ultimately disappointing as a familiar superhero movie. He praises Elastigirl’s fluid animated action and Jack-Jack’s comic chaos, while faulting the mechanical plotting and obvious villain reveal. [Read the review](https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/incredibles-2/) ## Little White Lies — Hannah Strong Rating 4/3/3. 23 June 2018. Strong finds the sequel charming and warm, though it relies too heavily on nostalgia and brings little new. She praises its family focus and singles out the strobe-lit confrontation as a standout scene. [Read the review](https://lwlies.com/reviews/incredibles-2) ## Variety — Owen Gleiberman Fi1m's normalised score 45/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. Gleiberman finds the sequel entertaining but disappointing, replaying the original rather than building on it. He singles out Jack-Jack as its most crowd-pleasing feature, while criticizing the story’s formulaic quality and lack of emotional impact. [Read the review](https://variety.com/2018/film/reviews/incredibles-2-review-holly-hunter-1202837069/) ## Consequence — Clint Worthington Fi1m's normalised score 90/100 (inferred from the text). 11 June 2018. The critic calls it one of Pixar’s finest follow-ups and a bright, crowd-pleasing superhero film. He especially praises Brad Bird’s animation and action, and Elastigirl’s liberating turn at the story’s center. [Read the review](https://consequence.net/2018/06/film-review-incredibles-2/) ## Digital Spy — Ian Sandwell Fi1m's normalised score 90/100 (inferred from the text). 13 July 2018. The critic says the sequel is a thrilling, joyful adventure that more than justifies the wait. He praises its inventive action set pieces and singles out Jack-Jack as the film’s hilarious, adorable MVP. [Read the review](https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a860589/incredibles-2-review-jack-jack/) ## /Film — Ethan Anderton Fi1m's normalised score 90/100 (inferred from the text). 19 June 2018. Anderton praises the sequel as a superb superhero film centered on family, with strong character development. He especially singles out Elastigirl’s inventive, thrilling action sequences. [Read the review](https://www.slashfilm.com/559029/incredibles-2-spoiler-review/) ## The Wrap — Alonso Duralde Fi1m's normalised score 90/100 (inferred from the text). 13 June 2018. The critic finds the sequel rousing, funny, and richer than its predecessor, with a welcome reversal of traditional family roles. Jack-Jack’s chaotic powers and comic antics are singled out as a standout source of humor. [Read the review](https://www.thewrap.com/incredibles-2-film-review-holly-hunter-brad-bird-pixar/) ## Eye for Film — Andrew Robertson Fi1m's normalised score 88/100 (inferred from the text). 24 June 2018. Festival review. The critic says the sequel meets high expectations and is a gleefully inventive success. They single out its gorgeous retro-futurist design and the crisp, surprising execution of its action and comedy. [Read the review](https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/incredibles-2-2018-film-review-by-andrew-robertson) ## Polygon — Karen Han Fi1m's normalised score 85/100 (inferred from the text). 14 June 2018. Han finds the sequel a lively, distinctive superhero film that stands up to its predecessor, though its broader scale makes it somewhat shakier. She especially praises the clear, inventive action staging and the fluid animation. [Read the review](https://www.polygon.com/2018/6/14/17464948/incredibles-2-review-pixar/) ## Collider — Matt Goldberg Rating B+. 11 June 2018. Goldberg calls the sequel worthwhile and one of Pixar’s finest, though it does not match the original’s heights. He especially praises the relatable, richer story of Mr. Incredible struggling to care for the children at home. [Read the review](https://collider.com/incredibles-2-review/) ## NME Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). The critic finds the sequel lively, charming and playful despite its lack of plot surprises. They especially praise Elastigirl’s action scenes and the film’s sharp family humor. [Read the review](https://www.nme.com/reviews/incredibles-2-film-review-2353967) ## The Skinny — Jamie Dunn Rating ★★★★. 25 June 2018. The critic praises the sequel as a breakneck, entertaining film that overcomes Pixar’s sequel curse. They single out its lucid action, especially Elastigirl’s runaway-monorail rescue. [Read the review](https://www.theskinny.co.uk/film/new-releases/incredibles-2) ## Paste — Michael Burgin Rating 9.1. 14 June 2018. Burgin finds the sequel messier and less compelling than the original, but still thoroughly enjoyable. He singles out the family interactions and Elastigirl’s resourceful heroics for praise. [Read the review](https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/the-incredibles/the-incredibles-2) ## Den of Geek — Ryan Lambie Rating 3/5. 13 July 2018. Lambie finds the sequel entertaining but less fresh and ambitious than the original. He praises its vibrant animation and assured action, while noting that the story’s ideas and supporting characters feel underused. [Read the review](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/the-incredibles-2-review-a-solidly-fun-superhero-sequel/) --- © Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Our review: https://film.one/film/incredibles-2.md