---
title: "Marie Antoinette: the reviews"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/marie-antoinette/reviews"
title_page: "https://film.one/film/marie-antoinette"
critics_score: 65
critics_reviews: 14
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Marie Antoinette (2006): what the critics said

Critics' score 65 from 14 reviews: 5 positive, 7 mixed, 2 negative.

The reviews lean towards qualified approval of Coppola’s Marie Antoinette, with more mixed responses than outright endorsements. Praise clusters around the costumes, settings and visual style, which impress even several critics left cold by the drama. Kirsten Dunst’s performance earns repeated approval, while the modern soundtrack is often praised for bringing Marie’s feelings closer to a contemporary audience. The more enthusiastic reviews find an empathetic portrait of a young woman constrained by privilege.

The spread is wide, however, and the central disagreement concerns how much feeling and insight lie beneath the courtly pleasures. IndieWire reads the film as compassionate rather than indulgent; Little White Lies finds Marie’s inner life neglected. Reservations elsewhere centre on thin characterisation, limited political context and a loss of momentum when historical events intrude. Even the soundtrack divides opinion: The Skinny finds that it competes with the dialogue and visual style rather than helping them.

## IndieWire — twhalliii

Fi1m's normalised score 95/100 (inferred from the text). 25 September 2006. Festival review. 

The critic strongly praises Coppola’s film as a compelling, empathetic portrait rather than a celebration of privilege. They single out its modern music as a vivid way to convey Marie’s inner life.

[Read the review](https://www.indiewire.com/news/general/the-2006-new-york-film-festival-sofia-coppolas-marie-antoinette-227796/)

## The New Yorker — Richard Brody

Fi1m's normalised score 85/100 (inferred from the text). 9 August 2016. 

Brody praises Coppola’s bold, insightful reimagining of Marie Antoinette beyond historical cliché. He singles out her exquisite visual style and close attention to women’s subjectivity.

[Read the review](https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/the-front-row-marie-antoinette)

## Empire — Ian Freer

Rating 4/5. 29 September 2006. 

Freer finds the film a gorgeous, giddy, imaginative romp, though it loses momentum when history disrupts Marie’s courtly life. He particularly praises the exuberant filmmaking, Dunst’s performance, and the lively soundtrack.

[Read the review](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/marie-antoinette-review/)

## Total Film — Total Film

Rating 4/5. 20 October 2006. 

The review finds Coppola’s film mesmerizing, elegant, and emotionally rewarding despite its loose approach to history. It praises Kirsten Dunst’s performance and the soundtrack, while faulting the rushed historical events in the final stretch.

[Read the review](https://www.gamesradar.com/marie-antoinette-review/)

## Screen Daily — Allan Hunter

Fi1m's normalised score 65/100 (inferred from the text). 25 May 2006. 

Hunter describes Coppola’s take on Marie Antoinette as a frivolous, fun-filled attempt to make Versailles accessible to modern audiences. He singles out the heroine’s shallow, celebrity-like portrayal.

[Read the review](https://www.screendaily.com/marie-antoinette/4027467.article)

## Little White Lies — Matt Bochenski

Rating 5/3/2. 9 October 2006. 

The review finds the film visually seductive but emotionally thin, arguing its rich story deserved more. It praises the sumptuous cinematography and design, while faulting Coppola for neglecting Marie Antoinette’s inner life and dramatic transformation.

[Read the review](https://lwlies.com/reviews/marie-antoinette)

## Radio Times — Alan Jones

Rating 3/5. 

Jones finds Coppola’s modernist portrait stylised, with historical fact yielding to a pop-video sensibility. He singles out the pressures of privilege as the director’s central interest.

[Read the review](https://www.radiotimes.com/movie-guide/b-18i0s4/marie-antoinette/)

## Slant Magazine — Ed Gonzalez

Rating 3/5. 12 February 2007. 

Gonzalez views the film as a humane, barbed portrait of Marie Antoinette’s constrained life. He especially praises its playful, modern soundtrack for illuminating her state of mind.

[Read the review](https://www.slantmagazine.com/dvd/marie-antoinette-dvd/)

## The Guardian — Peter Bradshaw

Fi1m's normalised score 60/100 (inferred from the text). 25 May 2006. Festival review. 

Bradshaw finds the film baffling and historically obtuse, but ultimately carried off with tremendous style. He singles out Coppola’s control of wordless mood and space as a major strength.

[Read the review](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2006/may/25/cannes2006.cannesfilmfestival5)

## Time Out — Dave Calhoun

Fi1m's normalised score 50/100 (inferred from the text). 17 October 2006. 

The visible description suggests a mixed verdict, saying Coppola has made a decent attempt at combining two very different film styles. It singles out the film’s evocation of both *Barry Lyndon* and *National Lampoon’s European Vacation*.

[Read the review](https://www.timeout.com/movies/marie-antoinette-1)

## Variety — Todd McCarthy

Fi1m's normalised score 40/100 (inferred from the text). 24 May 2006. Festival review. 

The critic finds the film visually pleasant but shallow, with an approach that largely avoids historical and dramatic complexity. He praises Kirsten Dunst’s performance and the sumptuous costumes, while faulting the film’s easy-listening style and lack of flair.

[Read the review](https://variety.com/2006/film/reviews/marie-antoinette-4-1200515977/)

## The Independent — Anthony Quinn

Fi1m's normalised score 30/100 (inferred from the text). 20 October 2006. 

The critic finds Coppola’s portrait visually sumptuous but dramatically empty and unengaging. The lavish costumes and confectionary imagery impress, while the film’s thin characterization and indifference to the political upheaval draw criticism.

[Read the review](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/marie-antoinette-12a-420757.html)

## Eye for Film — Jennie Kermode

Fi1m's normalised score 85/100 (inferred from the text). 19 October 2006. 

Kermode calls the film remarkable, though its quiet, unconventional approach may not work for everyone. She praises Kirsten Dunst’s performance and the sumptuous costumes and Versailles locations.

[Read the review](https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/marie-antoinette-film-review-by-jennie-kermode)

## The Skinny — Penny Bartlett

Rating ★★★. 12 November 2006. 

Bartlett finds the film ultimately unsatisfying, indecisive and overdone. She praises its evocative sense of place but says the competing style, dialogue and soundtrack disrupt it.

[Read the review](https://www.theskinny.co.uk/film/new-releases/marie-antoinette)

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Our review: https://film.one/film/marie-antoinette.md
