---
title: "Misery: the reviews"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/misery/reviews"
title_page: "https://film.one/film/misery"
critics_score: 74
critics_reviews: 8
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Misery (1990): what the critics said

Critics' score 74 from 8 reviews: 7 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Most critics find Misery an effective, darkly funny thriller, with praise centred on Kathy Bates and James Caan. Bates draws particular attention for making Annie Wilkes’s apparent kindness and threatening behaviour equally convincing, while Caan helps sustain the tense exchanges between writer and fan. The favourable reviews credit Rob Reiner’s handling of suspense and William Goldman’s screenplay with giving the adaptation a grounded setting, claustrophobic tension and something to say about celebrity and obsessive devotion.

The reservations concern how much the film achieves beyond keeping its audience tense, rather than whether its central performances work. RogerEbert.com finds the craftsmanship effective but short of greater inspiration, while The New York Times calls the story thin but engaging. The spread is fairly narrow, with no outright negative assessment: the Los Angeles Times supplies the clearest dissent, admiring the actors but finding Reiner’s approach flat-footed and too straightforward.

## Empire — Phil Thomas

Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 1 January 2000. 

Reiner proves he can handle thriller territory as effectively as comedy or fantasy. William Goldman’s screenplay builds a vivid, grounded reality from the Stephen King source, with outstanding turns from James Caan and Oscar-winner Kathy Bates as the unhinged Annie Wilkes.

[Read the review](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/misery-review/)

## Radio Times — Alan Jones

Rating 4/5. 

This is a superb adaptation that explores celebrity, fanatical devotion, and artistic dilemmas in a psychological suspense context. Kathy Bates delivers a monstrously scary, Oscar-winning performance as the number one fan, with the film delivering chills and jolts through claustrophobia.

[Read the review](https://www.radiotimes.com/movie-guide/b-01m4wv/misery/)

## The Guardian — Derek Malcolm

Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 9 May 1991. 

The critic finds the film entertaining and shrewd, praising Kathy Bates' inspired casting as the obsessive fan Annie Wilkes for her convincing, non-glamorous performance that balances kindness and threat effectively. James Caan and the supporting cast also deliver strong turns in this tense, well-paced thriller that avoids obvious pitfalls.

[Read the review](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/may/09/stephen-king-misery-kathy-bates-review)

## Time Out — CM

Fi1m's normalised score 80/100 (inferred from the text). 10 September 2012. 

The critic praises the darkly humorous adaptation of Stephen King's novel, noting the intelligent script's blend of psycho-thriller and commentary on celebrity. The casting of James Caan and Kathy Bates is highlighted as inspired, with Reiner effectively balancing tension and mental duels.

[Read the review](https://www.timeout.com/movies/misery)

## RogerEbert.com — Roger Ebert

Fi1m's normalised score 75/100 (inferred from the text). 30 November 1990. 

The film succeeds as a gripping two-hander thanks to strong performances, particularly Kathy Bates as the unhinged fan. Reiner delivers respectful craftsmanship that works effectively as a thriller without rising to greater inspiration.

[Read the review](https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/misery-1990)

## The New York Times — Vincent Canby

Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 30 November 1990. 

The adaptation finds a funny idea in the novel about a writer held captive by his obsessive fan, turning it into an effective suspense tale. It highlights the perils of fandom and the writer's predicament in a paper-thin but engaging story.

[Read the review](https://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/30/movies/review-film-a-writer-who-really-suffers.html)

## Variety — Variety Staff

Fi1m's normalised score 70/100 (inferred from the text). 31 December 1989. 

This is a commercial gothic thriller and functional adaptation that succeeds as a two-hander with effective casting and nasty interplay between the leads. Bates creates a memorable character while tech credits are solid.

[Read the review](https://variety.com/1989/film/reviews/misery-1200428326/)

## Los Angeles Times — Peter Rainer

Fi1m's normalised score 60/100 (inferred from the text). 30 November 1990. 

The two-character psychological thriller works better than most King adaptations due to its focus and strong acting by Bates and Caan. Reiner shows talent with actors but the film feels flat-footed and overly straightforward as pulp entertainment.

[Read the review](https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-11-30-ca-5410-story.html)

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Our review: https://film.one/film/misery.md
