---
title: "Nuremberg"
year: 2025
kind: "film"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/nuremberg"
fi1m_id: "nuremberg"
imdb_id: "tt29567915"
tmdb_id: 1214931
wikidata_id: "Q124393313"
fi1m_score: 64
critics_score: 61
critics_reviews: 21
published: "2026-09-24T12:13:45.645762+00:00"
updated: "2026-09-24T12:14:11.701748+00:00"
region: "LT"
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Nuremberg (2025)

Directed by James Vanderbilt · 2h 29m · LT N-13 · History, Drama

## Identity

Nuremberg

- **Canonical:** https://film.one/film/nuremberg
- **Type:** Film
- **Fi1m ID:** nuremberg
- **IMDb ID:** tt29567915
- **TMDB ID:** 1214931
- **Wikidata ID:** Q124393313
- **Same entity:** https://www.imdb.com/title/tt29567915/, https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/1214931, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q124393313

**Fi1m score: 64** · Critics 61 from 21 reviews

*In a sentence:* We would happily listen to Russell Crowe for longer, provided someone turned down the music

> Russell Crowe makes *Nuremberg* worth considering, especially for those drawn to courtroom drama. James Vanderbilt handles the trial with conviction, but the central exchanges between Douglas Kelley and Hermann Göring never feel searching enough.

## Synopsis

Before the Nuremberg Trials, Douglas Kelley (Rami Malek) seeks to understand Hermann Göring (Russell Crowe) through their conversations. Göring’s charm complicates the effort to assess the man and his responsibility. Justice Robert H. Jackson (Michael Shannon) approaches the defendants with a different task, preparing to make a case against the Nazi leadership in court. Kelley wants to know how Göring thinks; Jackson needs to establish what can be proved. As preparations for the trial proceed, the film follows the private exchanges alongside the work of bringing the defendants before the court in Nuremberg.

## Review

*Nuremberg* is worth considering for its actors, with a substantial reservation about what they have been given to say. James Vanderbilt approaches the trials as accessible courtroom drama, while the exchanges between Douglas Kelley and Hermann Göring promise a closer look at how such a man thinks. The film is much more assured when it gets into court. Its attempts to turn conversation into psychological discovery are watchable, but too often leave us with the obvious conclusion that a dangerous man can be personable.

Russell Crowe gives the film its strongest performance. His Hermann Göring has enough charm to hold our attention without letting us forget who is speaking, and that ordinary human appeal is disturbing. We can see why someone might keep listening to him, which gives the conversations a tension the writing does not always sustain. The script keeps returning to his charm when it needs to tell us more about how he uses it.

Rami Malek has the harder task as Douglas Kelley, because the film needs their exchanges to feel like a contest between people capable of unsettling one another. Too often, the balance favours Göring before a scene has properly begun. We can follow Kelley’s interest, but the dialogue supplies too little sense of what he discovers through it. Michael Shannon is more securely served as Justice Robert H. Jackson. In the courtroom, an argument has an immediate purpose and an opponent to answer it.

The physical production is much more convincing. Eve Stewart’s courtroom gives the proceedings a credible setting, and Dariusz Wolski photographs the drama with a polish suited to its conventional thriller ambitions. There is pleasure in that care, even when the writing is being over-explicit. Tom Eagles finds more urgency in the trial material than in the approach to it, although the film’s 149 minutes still feel longer than the story requires. Brian Tyler’s score is less helpful, pressing the seriousness of scenes that the actors have already made serious.

We were horrified by the archival footage from the liberated concentration camps. Those images show the human suffering that the conversations about responsibility can keep at a comfortable distance, and the film is right to make space for them. The difficulty comes when the familiar dramatic business resumes and seems thinner than before. The conversations that follow cannot match the force of the footage, and the writing does not become more searching to compensate.

Leo Woodall gives Sergeant Howie Triest a welcome emotional directness, though the writing leans too hard on the character to supply feeling. That is part of a wider habit of insisting on responses the material could earn for itself. A courtroom film has every reason to explain, but its explanations ought to help us understand the case. The political warnings are blunt enough to interrupt our interest in the people delivering them.

There is still a decent historical drama here for anyone drawn to trials and the people who conduct them. The supporting cast helps the formal proceedings hold our attention, despite the script’s tendency to explain too much. We would go for Russell Crowe and Michael Shannon, with expectations kept modest about the promised psychological insight. Allow for the length, and for music that rarely trusts us to recognise a serious moment.

*Fi1m score 64, published 24 September 2026.*

## What the critics say

The consensus on Nuremberg is mixed, though praise clusters around Russell Crowe’s portrayal of Göring. Across favourable and sceptical reviews, critics find him commanding, chilling and persuasive, with some also commending Rami Malek and the supporting cast. The courtroom scenes draw stronger responses than the build-up, while the archival concentration-camp footage is repeatedly identified as the film’s most affecting material. Admirers, including Time Out, welcome its accessible, old-fashioned courtroom-thriller approach.

The spread is wide, and the central disagreement concerns whether that conventional storytelling serves the history. Several critics find the political parallels timely; others consider them blunt or insufficiently explored. Reservations recur around uneven pacing, clumsy exposition and a central relationship that offers too little psychological insight. The archival footage also divides opinion about the surrounding drama: The Guardian argues that its force exposes the artificiality of the dramatised scenes, rather than strengthening them.

## Straight answers

**Is Nuremberg worth watching?**

*Nuremberg* is worth considering for Russell Crowe’s performance and its courtroom drama, though we score it a qualified 64 out of 100. It suits viewers interested in historical trials more than those seeking searching psychological insight: the central conversations offer too little discovery, while the 149-minute running time and insistent music test our patience.

**How long is Nuremberg, and what is it rated?**

*Nuremberg* runs 2h 29m and is rated N-13 by the LT in Lithuania. It is a history and drama film.

**Where can I watch Nuremberg in Lithuania?**

*Nuremberg* is not on any streaming or rental service in Lithuania at the moment. It is available in 27 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.

**How violent or frightening is Nuremberg, and is it suitable for children?**

*Nuremberg* has a UK 15 certificate and contains horrifying archival footage from the liberated concentration camps, making it unsuitable for children under 15. The images of human suffering warrant particular caution for sensitive older teenagers and adults; we would not mistake its emphasis on conversation and courtroom proceedings for an easy watch.

**How does Nuremberg compare to Judgment at Nuremberg?**

*Nuremberg* is the less searching drama beside [*Judgment at Nuremberg*](https://film.one/film/judgment-at-nuremberg), which we recommend for its harder questions about responsibility, compromise and legal judgement. The longer, sterner film earns its length despite some over-explanatory speeches; *Nuremberg* offers a more conventional courtroom drama, with Russell Crowe compelling even when the psychological exchanges tell us too little.

**What should I watch after Nuremberg?**

After *Nuremberg*, try [*Judgment at Nuremberg*](https://film.one/film/judgment-at-nuremberg) (1961, Fi1m 82): A longer, sterner courtroom reckoning with responsibility, compromise and the limits of legal judgement. Then [*The Lives of Others*](https://film.one/film/the-lives-of-others) (2006, Fi1m 84): For another study of listening, complicity and the people who serve authoritarian power.

### Reviews we read (21)

- **The Hollywood Reporter**, Michael Rechtshaffen (80/100, inferred): The critic finds the drama compelling, timely and powerfully directed. They especially praise Crowe and Malek’s performances, while also highlighting the supporting cast and the film’s consequential use of archival footage. [Read](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek-leo-woodall-1236364560/)
- **Time Out**, Phil de Semlyen (4/5): The critic calls the film gripping and smartly executed, with a rousing old-fashioned courtroom-thriller appeal. He singles out Russell Crowe as a showstopper. [Read](https://www.timeout.com/movies/nuremberg-review-2025)
- **Empire**, Barry Levitt (78/100, inferred): Levitt finds the film a powerful, well-paced addition to stories about the Nuremberg Trials, despite occasional missteps in balancing entertainment with its serious message. He especially praises the moving direction of the Holocaust-footage scene and Leo Woodall’s shattering performance. [Read](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/nuremberg/)
- **The AV Club**, Matthew Jackson (B): The critic finds the film’s first half uneven but says it becomes compelling once the trial begins. Russell Crowe’s commanding portrayal of Göring is singled out as a particular strength. [Read](https://www.avclub.com/nuremberg-review)
- **Sight and Sound**, BFI (70/100, inferred): The review finds the film more dramatically engaging than a prior Nuremberg miniseries and timely in its political warning, while noting some distortions of history and character. It praises Russell Crowe’s chilling portrayal of Göring and the film’s contemporary resonance. [Read](https://www.bfi.org.uk/sight-and-sound/reviews/nuremberg-russell-crowe-chilling-hermann-goring-this-compelling-nazi-drama)
- **Screen Daily**, Tim Grierson (65/100, inferred): The headline characterizes the film as an earnest courtroom drama. The accessible text does not reveal a specific element the critic praises or faults. [Read](https://www.screendaily.com/reviews/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-is-nazi-officer-hermann-goring-in-earnest-courtroom-drama/5208709.article)
- **RogerEbert.com** (64/100, inferred): The article title lists Nuremberg among its TIFF 2025 films. The page was inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined. [Read](https://www.rogerebert.com/festivals/tiff-2025-eternal-return-nuremberg-carolina-caroline)
- **The New York Times** (64/100, inferred): The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the material provided. [Read](https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/06/movies/nuremberg-review.html)
- **IndieWire**, Kate Erbland (C+): Erbland finds the film earnest but stale, arguing that its attempt to make the past feel timely leaves little new to say. She praises the chilling archival footage and the film’s strong production design, while criticizing its unconvincing dynamic between Kelley and Göring. [Read](https://www.indiewire.com/criticism/movies/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek-1235149891/)
- **Slant Magazine**, Rocco T. Thompson (2.5/4): Thompson finds the film a timely, thoughtful drama whose warning about authoritarianism ends in resigned pessimism. He praises Russell Crowe’s seductive, all-too-human portrayal of Göring, while criticizing the emotionally manipulative characterization of Sgt. Howard Triest. [Read](https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek/)
- **The Independent**, Clarisse Loughrey (3/5): Loughrey finds the film unexpectedly zippy but says its glossy Hollywood treatment ultimately stumbles. She praises the stark use of real footage from the liberated concentration camps, while faulting the film for retreating to familiar Hollywood storytelling afterward. [Read](https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-hermann-goring-b2865128.html)
- **Los Angeles Times**, Katie Walsh (50/100, inferred): Walsh finds the film worthwhile for its subject and message but ultimately uneven, with its tone and extra storylines weakening the drama. She praises the commanding performances by Russell Crowe and Michael Shannon, especially their courtroom confrontation. [Read](https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/movies/story/2025-11-06/nuremberg-review-russel-crowe-rami-malek-michael-shannon-james-vanderbilt)
- **Little White Lies**, Lillian Crawford (2/2/2): Crawford finds the film well-intentioned but clumsy and superficial in its attack on contemporary American fascism. She criticizes its heavy-handed dialogue and the bluntness of its political parallels. [Read](https://lwlies.com/reviews/nuremberg)
- **Variety**, Owen Gleiberman (35/100, inferred): Gleiberman finds the film competent and watchable but short on psychological tension and insight. He praises Russell Crowe’s commanding performance while faulting the film for failing to reveal the person behind Göring’s evil image. [Read](https://variety.com/2025/film/reviews/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek-1236510852/)
- **The Guardian**, Radheyan Simonpillai (30/100, inferred): The critic finds the film watchable but ultimately glib, failing to make the historical events feel authentic. The real concentration-camp footage is singled out for exposing how artificial the surrounding drama feels. [Read](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2025/sep/08/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek)
- **Deadline**, Kate Vermes (90/100, inferred): The critic finds the film thrilling, urgent, and especially relevant today. She praises the performances, particularly Russell Crowe and Rami Malek, and highlights the courtroom scenes and archival footage. [Read](https://deadline.com/2025/09/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-malek-1236509102/)
- **The Wrap** (80/100, inferred): The critic finds this historical drama poignant and compelling, praising Crowe’s towering, terrifying performance as Göring. The ensemble and its focus on the psychology behind the trials give the familiar history fresh strength. [Read](https://www.thewrap.com/nuremberg-review-rami-malek-russell-crowe-tiff-2025/)
- **Collider**, Ross Bonaime (6/10): Bonaime finds the film solid but unremarkable, with a slow build that only becomes powerful in its final act. He praises Russell Crowe’s commanding performance as Göring, while criticizing the film for taking too long to reach its most affecting moments. [Read](https://collider.com/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-rami-makek/)
- **The Playlist**, Gregory Ellwood (C): Ellwood finds the film flat and overly old-fashioned, despite its important subject and timely political parallels. He singles out the screening of real footage from the concentration camps as genuinely horrifying. [Read](https://theplaylist.net/nuremberg-review-russell-crowe-is-a-war-criminal-in-james-vanderbilt-too-old-school-war-crimes-drama-tiff-20250909/)
- **HeyUGuys** (50/100, inferred): The critic finds the film engaging but ultimately hollow, as its character drama fails to confront the full weight of its subject. Crowe and Malek’s compelling exchanges are singled out as a strength. [Read](https://www.heyuguys.com/nuremberg-review/)
- **Eye for Film**, Andrew Robertson (30/100, inferred): The critic finds the film unfocused and uneven, falling short of a compelling battle of wits. They fault its clumsy exposition and heavy-handed score, while noting that it looks great in places. [Read](https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/nuremberg-2025-film-review-by-andrew-robertson)

## Details

- **Director:** James Vanderbilt
- **Director:** James Vanderbilt
- **Writer:** James Vanderbilt
- **Cinematography:** Dariusz Wolski
- **Editor:** Tom Eagles
- **Music:** Brian Tyler
- **Production design:** Eve Stewart
- **Costume design:** Bartholomew Cariss
- **Producer:** Richard Saperstein, James Vanderbilt, Bradley J. Fischer
- **Cast:** Rami Malek as Douglas Kelley; Russell Crowe as Hermann Göring; Michael Shannon as Justice Robert H. Jackson; Leo Woodall as Sergeant Howie Triest; John Slattery as Colonel Burton Andrus; Richard E. Grant as Sir David Maxwell-Fyfe; Mark O'Brien as Colonel John Amen; Colin Hanks as Dr. Gustave Gilbert
- **Runtime:** 2h 29m
- **Certificate (LT):** N-13
- **Release (Lithuania):** 28 November 2025
- **Genres:** History, Drama
- **Budget:** $12 million
- **Box office:** $37 million
- **Trailer:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWlCCVnZ4bo

## Where to watch in Lithuania

Not streaming, renting or buying in Lithuania at the last check.

Also available in: AR, AT, AU, BE, BR, CA, CH, CL, CO, CZ, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, HU, IN, IT, MX, NL, NO, NZ, PA, PL, RO, SE, US. Add `?region=XX` to this URL for another country.

## If you liked this

- *Judgment at Nuremberg* (1961), Fi1m 82: A longer, sterner courtroom reckoning with responsibility, compromise and the limits of legal judgement. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/judgment-at-nuremberg.md)
- *The Lives of Others* (2006), Fi1m 84: For another study of listening, complicity and the people who serve authoritarian power. — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/the-lives-of-others.md)
- *The Ascent* (1977): Wartime interrogation tests conviction and cowardice with little room for reassuring explanations.
- *Conspiracy* (2001): Polite conversation becomes horrifying as officials turn mass murder into administrative business.
- *Denial* (2016): Another courtroom drama concerned with how historical truth survives deliberate, organised distortion.

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Canonical: https://film.one/film/nuremberg
