---
title: "Spider-Man 3"
year: 2007
kind: "film"
canonical: "https://film.one/film/spider-man-3"
fi1m_id: "spider-man-3"
imdb_id: "tt0413300"
tmdb_id: 559
wikidata_id: "Q182212"
fi1m_score: 55
critics_score: 54
critics_reviews: 15
published: "2026-10-01T19:56:27.642020+00:00"
updated: "2026-10-01T19:56:36.085576+00:00"
region: "VN"
licence: "© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL."
---

# Spider-Man 3 (2007)

Directed by Sam Raimi · 2h 19m · Action, Adventure, Science Fiction

## Identity

Spider-Man 3

- **Canonical:** https://film.one/film/spider-man-3
- **Type:** Film
- **Fi1m ID:** spider-man-3
- **IMDb ID:** tt0413300
- **TMDB ID:** 559
- **Wikidata ID:** Q182212
- **Same entity:** https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0413300/, https://www.themoviedb.org/movie/559, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q182212

**Fi1m score: 55** · Critics 54 from 15 reviews

*In a sentence:* Three villains, two Peter Parkers and one dance number; the dance number wins, and not in a good way

> Sam Raimi’s third outing has one of the best scenes in the series, a man made of sand trying to pick up a locket, and then buries it under two more villains and a jazz-club dance. Worth it for Thomas Haden Church; brace for the rest.

## Synopsis

New York, and Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) is having a good year. The city has taken to Spider-Man, Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) is opening on Broadway, and Peter is carrying the engagement ring his aunt May (Rosemary Harris) gave him. Harry Osborn (James Franco) knows Peter’s secret, blames him for his father’s death and has his father’s glider. Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church), a convict with a sick daughter, escapes prison and stumbles into a physics experiment that turns him to sand. A meteorite lands in Central Park beside Peter’s scooter, trailing something black and alive. At the Bugle, J. Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons) hires a rival photographer, Eddie Brock (Topher Grace), and lab partner Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard) soon needs rescuing from a runaway crane.

## Review

Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) begins *Spider-Man 3* happy, and that is the first thing the film has to fix. The script, by Sam Raimi, Ivan Raimi and Alvin Sargent, sets about spoiling it from three directions at once: Harry Osborn (James Franco), who knows who Peter is and has his father’s equipment; Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church), an escaped convict who wanders into a physics experiment; and a black, oily something that falls out of the sky in Central Park. That is a lot of trouble for one 139-minute film, and the film knows it.

The Marko strand is the one that works. Church plays him as a tired, decent man who has done an indecent thing for his sick daughter, and the scene in which he becomes the Sandman is the best in the picture. He wakes in a pit of sand, tries to stand and falls apart; then the sand gathers itself and reaches for a locket with her photograph, fails, and tries again. Bill Pope lights it in a flat grey half-light so you cannot tell where the man ends and the ground begins, and Christopher Young gives it a low, grieving theme with no brass in it at all. We were moved more than we expected to be, and we were moved by a pile of sand.

Then there is Peter in black. The suit, which James Acheson and Katina Le Kerr have given a raised webbing that looks grown rather than sewn, makes him stronger and nastier, and Raimi decides to play the nastiness as comedy. Peter gets a fringe, struts down a pavement pointing at women, and performs a dance number in a jazz club that goes on just past the point of being a joke. We laughed, then sat there unsure whether we had been meant to. Raimi has always liked slapstick. Here it sits inside a film asking, in the same breath, to be taken seriously about grief and revenge, and the two never agree on a tone.

Overcrowding does the rest of the damage. Franco has the best material after Church, a man who hates his oldest friend and keeps changing his mind about what to do about it, but his story is put down every time another needs picking up. Topher Grace’s Eddie Brock is a rival photographer at the Bugle, slippery and funny for two scenes and then a prop; what he becomes we will leave to the credits. Bryce Dallas Howard’s Gwen Stacy is Peter’s lab partner and exists so other people can see her with him. Dunst is given a bad week and asked to cry through it, and Mary Jane’s trouble is never as interesting as anyone else’s. Only J.K. Simmons, bellowing at a desk about his blood pressure, comes out exactly as he went in.

The action is handled with more care than the plot. Bob Murawski cuts the opening fight between Peter and Harry fast and low, through alleys and under fire escapes, so the camera is always a beat behind them, and the sequence in which a runaway crane takes the side off an office block is shot by Pope among the falling glass, with the fall itself held long enough to hurt. Neil Spisak and J. Michael Riva’s Manhattan is the same brownstone-and-newsroom city as before. The final fight is loud, everyone is in it, and it is the point at which we stopped minding who won.

Raimi’s previous film in the series had one villain, one problem and one idea, and it was better for the arithmetic. This one has three of each and the sums do not add up. Most critics landed where we have, split down the middle, and we understand the half that enjoyed it: there is a decent two-hour film in here about a man made of sand and a boy who misses his father.

See it for Church, who gives the series its saddest villain and gets about twenty minutes to do it in. For the rest, keep the remote within reach; the dance number is shorter than it feels, but only just.

*Fi1m score 55, published 1 October 2026.*

## What the critics say

The reviews split almost evenly, and few critics are indifferent. Where they agree is on the Sandman. Thomas Haden Church’s performance and the scene of his transformation are named as the film’s best moments across the whole spread, from the warmest notices to the coldest. The visual effects are admired nearly everywhere, and several reviews single out the aerial fights, the skyscraper battle in particular, as the action done well.

The reservations cluster on crowding. Most critics find the film overstuffed, with too many villains, too much plot and a slapstick streak from Raimi that sits awkwardly beside the serious scenes. The spread is wide: Total Film and /Film call it a satisfying finale, while The New Yorker and Eye for Film find it chaotic and thin. Time Out is the lone dissenter on length, enjoying the sprawl as something like a television season in a box.

## Straight answers

**Is Spider-Man 3 worth watching?**

*Spider-Man 3* is worth watching for Thomas Haden Church's Sandman and not much else, and we scored it 55. Three villains, a jazz-club dance number and 139 crowded minutes smother the one strand that works, a tired convict trying to pick up his daughter's locket. Fans of the first two films who can forgive a lot will get an evening out of it; anyone else should start elsewhere.

**How long is Spider-Man 3, and what is it rated?**

*Spider-Man 3* runs 2h 19m. It is an action and adventure film.

**Where can I watch Spider-Man 3 in Vietnam?**

*Spider-Man 3* is streaming on Netflix in Vietnam, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV from ₫39,000. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.

**How violent or frightening is Spider-Man 3, and is it suitable for children?**

*Spider-Man 3* is a 12A, with comic-book fights, a runaway crane that takes the side off an office block, and no blood to speak of. The Sandman's transformation is sad rather than frightening, and Peter in the black suit is nasty and strutting rather than scary. Children of ten or so should be fine; the youngest may find the crane sequence and the loud final fight too much.

**How does Spider-Man 3 compare to Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse?**

*Spider-Man 3* is the weaker of the two: [*Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse*](https://film.one/film/spider-man-into-the-spider-verse) is funnier, better written and puts several Spider-Men on screen without feeling crowded, where Raimi's film sinks under three villains. The animated film is the one we would choose for most evenings, with a small caveat that its busiest action sometimes loses the people in it. Pick *Spider-Man 3* only for live action and Church's Sandman.

### Reviews we read (15)

- **Time Out**, Ben Walters (4/5): The review finds the film’s sprawling length oddly enjoyable, like watching a season of television in a box set. It singles out that expansive, episodic feel as a positive. [Read](https://www.timeout.com/movies/spider-man-3)
- **Total Film**, Total Film (4/5): The critic finds it a hugely entertaining, deftly handled finale, despite its lack of the expected darkness. They praise Thomas Haden Church’s sympathetic performance and the thrilling final action set-piece. [Read](https://www.gamesradar.com/spider-man-3-review-2/)
- **The Hollywood Reporter**, Michael Rechtshaffen (75/100, inferred): The review finds the film entertaining and likely to please fans, though it is less tightly executed than its predecessor. It especially praises the spectacular visual-effects sequences and the performances of Thomas Haden Church and Topher Grace. [Read](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-reviews/review-spider-man-3-134563/)
- **The AV Club**, Noel Murray (B-): Murray finds the film a letdown despite its superb action and weighty theme. He praises the aerial action but faults Raimi’s overdone slapstick and scenes of serious conversation. [Read](https://www.avclub.com/spider-man-3-1798202584)
- **Empire**, Chris Hewitt (65/100, inferred): The critic finds the film consistently enjoyable but overstuffed, and says it falls short of completing the trilogy on a high note. They praise Tobey Maguire’s performance and the emotional intensity of Peter’s relationship with Mary Jane. [Read](https://www.empireonline.com/movies/reviews/spider-man-3-review/)
- **The Guardian**, Rob Mackie (65/100, inferred): Mackie finds the film overlong and less charming than its predecessor, but still an enjoyable thrill-ride. He praises the performances of Thomas Haden Church and Bryce Dallas Howard, while finding the villains less compelling. [Read](https://www.theguardian.com/film/2007/oct/15/dvdreviews.actionandadventure)
- **Slant Magazine**, Ed Gonzalez (2/4): Gonzalez finds the film overstuffed, tiring, and a disappointing follow-up to its predecessors. He praises the Sandman’s portrayal as the film’s closest approach to the earlier films’ emotional depth. [Read](https://www.slantmagazine.com/film/spider-man-3/)
- **Screen Daily**, Allan Hunter (35/100, inferred): Hunter finds the trilogy finale hectic and vaguely underwhelming. He singles out its overstuffed, hectic result as a weakness. [Read](https://www.screendaily.com/spider-man-3/4032012.article)
- **Variety**, Todd McCarthy (30/100, inferred): McCarthy finds the film a disappointing step down, weighed down by a weak script and stale character dynamics. He praises Sandman’s visual interest and melancholy undercurrent, while noting the effects remain impressive. [Read](https://variety.com/2007/film/awards/spider-man-3-3-1200559890/)
- **The New Yorker**, Anthony Lane (20/100, inferred): Lane finds the film a chaotic, incoherent disappointment, despite one thrilling sequence. He singles out Sandman’s transformation as the film’s great scene, while criticizing its muddled rules and excess villains. [Read](https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/05/07/acting-out)
- **/Film**, Peter Sciretta (8/10): Sciretta finds the film good, despite feeling it is overcrowded and weakened by plot problems. He praises the Peter-Harry storyline’s dramatic payoff and the skyscraper fight’s excitement. [Read](https://www.slashfilm.com/496174/movie-review-spider-man-3/)
- **Paste**, Tim Basham (65/100, inferred): Basham finds the film entertaining but weighed down by corny dialogue and weaker performances. He praises J.K. Simmons’ comic portrayal of J. Jonah Jameson and the film’s creative action set piece. [Read](https://www.pastemagazine.com/movies/spider-man/spider-man-3)
- **Den of Geek**, Ron Hogan (40/100, inferred): Hogan finds the film neither good nor bad, calling it a solid rental that falls short of expectations. He praises Sandman’s effects and Venom’s menace, but faults the rushed pacing and underdeveloped villains. [Read](https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/review-spider-man-3/)
- **Digital Spy**, Mark Langshaw (2/5): The critic calls Spider-Man 3 the trilogy’s low point, arguing Raimi’s approach leaves it far removed from the series’ tone. The visual effects are singled out for praise, but they cannot overcome the crowded plot and misjudged humor. [Read](https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a390711/spider-man-revisited-a-look-back-at-the-sam-raimi-trilogy/)
- **Eye for Film**, Scott Macdonald (10/100, inferred): Macdonald finds the film a monumental disappointment, overwhelmed by a thin story and too many villains. He praises the technically flawless visual effects, but says the climactic fight is contrived and unexciting. [Read](https://www.eyeforfilm.co.uk/review/spider-man-3-film-review-by-scott-macdonald)

## Details

- **Director:** Sam Raimi
- **Director:** Sam Raimi
- **Screenplay:** Alvin Sargent, Sam Raimi, Ivan Raimi
- **Cinematography:** Bill Pope
- **Editor:** Bob Murawski
- **Music:** Christopher Young
- **Production design:** J. Michael Riva, Neil Spisak
- **Costume design:** James Acheson, Katina Le Kerr
- **Producer:** Avi Arad, Grant Curtis, Laura Ziskin
- **Cast:** Tobey Maguire as Spider-Man / Peter Parker; Kirsten Dunst as Mary Jane Watson; James Franco as New Goblin / Harry Osborn; Thomas Haden Church as Sandman / Flint Marko; Topher Grace as Venom / Eddie Brock; Bryce Dallas Howard as Gwen Stacy; Rosemary Harris as May Parker; J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson
- **Runtime:** 2h 19m
- **First release (Japan):** 16 April 2007
- **Genres:** Action, Adventure, Science Fiction
- **Budget:** $258 million
- **Box office:** $895 million
- **Trailer:** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5wUilOeOmg

## Where to watch in Vietnam

- Netflix: streaming
- Apple TV: rent ₫39,000, hd
- Apple TV: buy ₫169,000, sd

*Checked 2026-10-01.*

Also available in: AE, AR, AT, AU, AZ, BE, BG, BR, CA, CH, CL, CO, CZ, DE, DK, EC, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HK, HR, HU, ID, IE, IL, IN, IS, IT, JP, KR, LT, MX, MY, NL, NO, NZ, PA, PE, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SG, SI, TH, TR, UA, US, VN, ZA. Add `?region=XX` to this URL for another country.

## If you liked this

- *Spider-Man 2* (2004): The one before, with one villain, one problem and a train, and all the better for it
- *Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse* (2018), Fi1m 87: Several Spider-Men at once and somehow not a crowd; the sharpest script the character has had — [Fi1m page](https://film.one/film/spider-man-into-the-spider-verse.md)
- *Darkman* (1990): Raimi’s own disfigured hero, made cheap and angry, with the slapstick and the grief in balance
- *Superman II* (1980): A hero gives up his powers for a woman and learns what that costs, in under two hours
- *The Heroic Trio* (1993): Hong Kong superheroines, wire work and real melancholy; proof that excess can be disciplined

---
© Fi1m Ltd. Written by AI under a human editor; checked against sources before publication. Quote with attribution and a link to the canonical URL. Canonical: https://film.one/film/spider-man-3