Critics’ reviews

10 Things I Hate About You (1999)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 74: 11 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of 10 Things I Hate About You

74
Positive
11
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to 10 Things I Hate About You, praising a witty high-school Shakespeare update that gives its young characters some intelligence. Praise centres on the sharp script, the appeal across generations and the chemistry between Julia Stiles and Heath Ledger. Stiles draws particular attention for making Kat spirited and unapologetic. Several reviews also welcome the treatment of teenage girls, finding more respect for their anger and independence than the familiar romantic-comedy setup might suggest.

The reservations concern how well that freshness survives the plotting, with some reviews finding forced literary references, recycled situations and an uneven tone. The responses range from enthusiastic to mixed, with none wholly negative. Variety finds the energetic scenes insufficiently connected and the dialogue divided between wit and juvenility. Sight and Sound offers a firmer dissent, arguing that the adaptation makes Shakespeare accessible without developing the harder edge it needs.

Total Film
9 July 1999
88*

The critic hails it as a surprisingly sharp and joyously entertaining teen comedy that succeeds where it has no right to. They single out the fast-paced plot delivery, believable mismatched leads, great one-liners, and fun updating of Shakespeare for praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
9 July 1999
85*

The critic finds it the smartest, funniest and most likeable film of the week, praising its charming homage to Shakespeare’s The Taming of the Shrew in a high school setting. They single out its literate script and the way it pays young audiences the compliment of intelligence with literary references.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
31 March 1999 · Kevin Thomas
80*

The critic calls the film witty and bristling with appeal across generations due to its sharp adaptation and direction. He singles out Julia Stiles' strong, unapologetic performance as Katarina for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Joanna Berry
80

An engaging romantic comedy that smartly updates Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew to high-school America in the style of Clueless, with strong performances and appeal to both teens and adults.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2019 · Caroline Siede
80*

The critic calls it the best of the 1999 teen romantic comedies and the year's thinking-person's version, crediting its thoughtful Shakespeare update with late-'90s Riot Grrrl energy, naturalistic lead performances, and genuine respect for angry teen girls who do not need to change to earn their happy endings.

Read the full review →
Time Out
13 April 2015 · CO'Su
80*

The film is praised as a quiet revelation that updates the source material with sharper female characters, plausible relationships and gentle wit, outperforming more flashy adaptations like Baz Luhrmann's Romeo + Juliet.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
78*

The critic calls it a solid summer crowd-pleaser that modernizes The Taming of the Shrew into a bright teen comedy. They single out the likeable characters, spirited performances (especially Stiles), incidental humor, and Ledger's standout musical sequence for praise, while noting some patchy plotting.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 March 2019 · David Hunter
78*

The critic calls it a spirited, shameless teen rom-com reworking of The Taming of the Shrew with a bright young cast that is destined to score with its target audience, though not for serious Shakespeare fans. Praises the chemistry and success of leads Julia Stiles and Heath Ledger.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
31 March 1999
70*

The review praises the film's efforts to incorporate Shakespearean elements but finds some of them forced. It highlights Julia Stiles' spirited and feminist portrayal of Kat as a standout charm amid the teen movie conventions.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
31 March 1999 · Roger Ebert
65*

The critic finds the film charming in spots thanks to its cast and lively scenes but notes it is trapped by a tired recycled plot formula. He singles out the sweet chemistry between the leads and some inventive musical moments for praise while criticizing tedious party scenes.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 March 1999
50*

The review finds the results scattershot and lacking cohesion despite high energy, with dialogue that mixes inspired and juvenile elements. It notes the cast is decent, particularly Stiles and Ledger, but the film lands in the middle of the genre.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
· Peter Matthews
45*

The critic sees the film as a lightweight teen comedy adaptation of The Taming of the Shrew that lacks artistic integrity and fails to develop a hard edge, despite attempts to make Shakespeare accessible to young audiences.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
31 March 2015 · Emma Dibdin
85*

The critic celebrates the film's lasting charm as a witty modern screwball romance and loose Shakespeare adaptation, noting its fresh take on high school tropes through sharp scripting and strong leads.

Read the full review →
Collider
20 January 2010 · Brendan Bettinger
80*

The critic highlights the film's enduring rewatchability and the strong ensemble cast, especially Heath Ledger's charismatic breakout performance as Patrick, while noting its loose, modern adaptation of The Taming of the Shrew succeeds on charm and surface-level appeal.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
65*

The critic finds the film starts with sharp wit as a high-school Taming of the Shrew but loses its edge once the central couple softens and the soundtrack becomes noticeable. The unknown young cast delivers a fresh and funny ensemble piece, though the director and writers are less successful at sustaining the initial spark.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate