Critics’ reviews

2 Fast 2 Furious (2003)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 53: 1 positive, 6 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of 2 Fast 2 Furious

53
Positive
1
Mixed
6
Negative
2

The reviews lean towards a mixed verdict on 2 Fast 2 Furious: the racing supplies some straightforward entertainment, but the story offers little freshness or substance. Praise clusters around the expanded driving sequences, energetic camerawork and Tyrese’s contribution to the central partnership with Paul Walker. Even several critics who find the sequel shallow enjoy its willingness to be absurd, though enthusiasm for the thrills rarely extends to the familiar crime plot.

The spread is wide, with disagreement over both the action and how the sequel compares with its predecessor. Empire finds the action and dialogue short on excitement, despite seeing promise in Tyrese Gibson. The Guardian is more dismissive, objecting to the loss of social commentary and the reliance on spectacle. Eye for Film provides the clearest counterpoint: it considers the sequel an improvement, crediting Tyrese’s humour and emotional range while still finding the material formulaic.

Screen Daily
6 June 2003 · John Hazelton
64*

The review's verdict and specific praise or criticism are unavailable behind the paywall. The visible page identifies a Screen review but provides no evaluative text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· SCr
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its metadata frames the film as a mock vehicle test but gives no discernible praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
3 June 2003 · ★★½/4 · Nick Schager
62

Schager finds the sequel empty but entertainingly self-aware, delivering satisfying mindless thrills. He praises its energetic camera work around the cars and its recognition of its own absurdity.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

The review finds the sequel shallow and its story lower-octane, but entertaining enough as loud, dumb fun. It praises the revved-up cheap thrills while lamenting Vin Diesel’s absence.

Read the full review →
Total Film
20 June 2003 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The critic finds it a satisfying sequel that falls short of the original but keeps the franchise’s engine running. The expanded racing sequences and Cole Hauser’s charmingly menacing villain are particular strengths.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 June 2003 · Todd McCarthy
55*

McCarthy finds the sequel an entertaining but less fresh follow-up. He praises the lively chemistry between Paul Walker and Tyrese, while faulting the familiar crime-story conventions.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Alan Morrison
30*

Morrison finds the sequel weaker than the original, with action and dialogue that fail to deliver much excitement. He singles out Tyrese Gibson as a promising discovery.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 June 2003 · Mark Kermode
15*

Kermode gives the sequel a sharply negative verdict, calling it empty and lacking substance. He singles out the racing set pieces as its main attraction, while criticizing the loss of social commentary and reliance on spectacle.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 June 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic considers the sequel an improvement, though it remains formulaic and unoriginal. Tyrese’s humor and emotional range are singled out as the key strengths of the film and its central double act.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate