Critics’ reviews

A History of Violence (2005)

12 reviews from 12 publications. Critics’ score 81: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of A History of Violence

81
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics praise A History of Violence as a tightly controlled thriller that makes its violence exciting, then asks what that excitement costs. The praise centres on Cronenberg’s precise direction and the performances, particularly Mortensen’s shifts in persona and the intimacy he establishes with Bello. The reviews repeatedly find substance in the film’s treatment of identity, marriage and family, while its western and noir influences give those concerns a clear, economical shape.

The disagreement concerns how much depth lies beneath that economy. The Independent finds fewer ambiguities than the premise deserves, despite admiring the film’s directness. Slant Magazine is the clearest dissenter, judging Cronenberg’s handling impersonal and the material thin, though it praises Bello’s wounded performance. The spread is therefore wider than the strongly positive consensus might suggest: the same straightforward storytelling reads to most critics as discipline, and to a minority as simplification.

RogerEbert.com
22 September 2005 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

Ebert calls it a brilliant and disturbing film that uses violence to explore identity and consequences. He singles out the performances and Cronenberg's precise direction for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 September 2005 · Manohla Dargis
90*

Dargis praises the film as a masterpiece of visceral thrills and indirection that forces viewers to confront the cost of movie violence. She highlights Cronenberg's refusal to let audiences indulge in violence without consequence.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
2 October 2005 · Philip French
85*

The critic calls Cronenberg's film a stunning modern-day western that examines the role of violence in American society and popular culture through a pared-down thriller narrative. He highlights the uniformly excellent performances, especially by Mortensen and Harris, along with the superb cinematography.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
21 September 2005 · Keith Phipps
80*

Cronenberg respects the thriller needs of the pulp material while sneaking in deeper explorations of violence’s everyday underpinnings and a marriage in crisis. The critic highlights the lived-in intimacy between Mortensen and Bello and the way the film gets most graphic with characters’ emotions.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 September 2005 · Jeremiah Kipp
45*

Cronenberg delivers journeyman work that feels like a work-for-hire rather than personal filmmaking, with the material treated like one-dimensional comic-book juvenilia. The critic singles out Maria Bello’s rich, soulfully wounded performance as the anchor that occasionally reveals cutting emotional truths about marriage and betrayal.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Adam Smith

A confident return to form and Cronenberg’s most accessible film since The Fly, this comic-book fable influenced by Westerns sneaks in his familiar themes of violence as contagion and personal metamorphosis while leaving viewers uncomfortable about their reactions to the action.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
· Derek Malcolm

Cronenberg’s study of violence and its effects on a family, laced with sex and humour, keeps the audience off-balance while showing the darkness behind the hero’s triumphs; it is a strange but compulsive watch from a director who knows exactly what he is doing.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 May 2005 · festival review

Cronenberg gene-splices film noir and the Western into vigorous new shape in what looks like his most mainstream project in years but reveals characteristic themes and masterful classical screen language. It singles out the effective thriller elements combined with philosophical depth and strong performances from Mortensen and Bello.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 October 2005 · Richard Falcon

Cronenberg's film is a fantastically sure-footed meta-thriller that is both rooted in and self-conscious about the pleasures of violent Hollywood thrillers. It singles out the hyperreal, detailed handling of violence and the performances, especially Mortensen's subtle shift in persona.

Read the full review →
The Independent
1 October 2005 · Nicholas Barber

The film strips the graphic novel source to a wry look at how violence disrupts a family’s psyche, making it Cronenberg’s most straightforward and crowd-pleasing work in two decades, though perhaps too straightforward with fewer ambiguities than the premise deserves.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 September 2005 · GA

Though Cronenberg's most mainstream movie in years, it is marvellous as a terrific thriller that transcends generic concerns with a subversive critique of the American Dream. It singles out the brilliant wit, bravura style, perfect pacing and peak-form performances.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 September 2005 · Scott Macdonald
90*

Cronenberg's film is a smashingly effective thriller and elegant character study that eschews gimmickry for challenging, superbly constructed cinema, marking it as the year's best. The critic singles out the stunning mood created by Peter Suschitzky's cinematography and the uniform excellence of the cast, particularly Mortensen and Bello.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate