Critics’ reviews

A Talent for Murder (2026)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 68: 7 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of A Talent for Murder

68
Positive
7
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics find A Talent for Murder an entertaining, witty mystery, with praise concentrated on Helen Mirren’s portrayal of Patricia Highsmith and her exchanges with Alden Ehrenreich. The leads’ verbal sparring gives the film much of its tension, even in reviews that find the plotting less persuasive. Several critics also admire its polished appearance, slow-building suspense and understanding of Highsmith’s fiction.

The reservations concern momentum, theatrical staging and whether the mystery has enough bite. Opinion ranges widely: The Playlist finds the plotting consistently suspenseful, while The Guardian thinks it fails to deliver the expected surprises or give its leads sufficiently vicious material. Ehrenreich also divides opinion within the broadly positive reviews. The Wrap regards his nuanced, shifting performance as the film’s chief strength, whereas Deadline finds him less convincing when the story takes its meta turn. The performances attract firmer agreement than the script.

IndieWire
14 September 2026 · B · Kate Erbland
77

Erbland finds the film an entertaining, clever mystery, though it loses momentum when it strays from its central two-hander. She especially praises the sharp, compelling face-offs between Helen Mirren and Alden Ehrenreich.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 October 2026 · ★★★/4 · Chris Barsanti
75

Barsanti calls the film an elegant, witty potboiler that captures the compulsions behind Ripley. He praises the performances and the film’s understanding of Highsmith’s work.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 September 2026 · festival review · Caryn James
75*

The critic finds the film an entertaining, sleek homage whose shortcomings do little to diminish its appeal. She praises Helen Mirren’s performance and the film’s sumptuous look and absorbing slow-burn style.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
19 October 2026 · B- · Monica Castillo
70

Castillo finds the film a clever, entertaining cat-and-mouse drama, though its staging feels too theatrical. She singles out the electric mental chess between Helen Mirren and Alden Ehrenreich for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
20 October 2026 · ★★★ · Elizabeth Weitzman
60

Weitzman finds the film underpowered overall, despite Helen Mirren’s lively performance as Patricia Highsmith. She singles out Mirren’s spirited turn, while faulting the meta-mystery for not cutting deep enough.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
15 September 2026 · festival review · Benjamin Lee
50*

Lee finds the film an admirable but uneven return to twisty chamber thrillers, with its plot failing to deliver the expected surprises. He praises Helen Mirren and Alden Ehrenreich as a formidable pair, but says the script gives them too little truly vicious material.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
16 September 2026 · Tim Grierson
35*

The headline characterizes the thriller as underwhelming, suggesting a negative verdict. It singles out Helen Mirren’s spiky portrayal of Patricia Highsmith.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
15 September 2026 · festival review
90*

The critic finds the film a joyous, tense showcase that works especially well because of Alden Ehrenreich. They single out his nuanced, shifting performance as the film’s standout strength.

Read the full review →
The Playlist
21 September 2026 · B+ · Zachary Lee
83

The critic finds it a first-rate, suspenseful mystery that keeps viewers guessing through its final frame. They praise the lead performances and the way the visual worlds of fact and fiction gradually bleed together.

Read the full review →
Deadline
16 September 2026 · festival review · Damon Wise
75*

Wise calls the film flawed but very entertaining, with a strangely satisfying conclusion. He especially praises Helen Mirren’s mesmerizing portrayal of Patricia Highsmith, while finding Alden Ehrenreich less convincing in the film’s meta turn.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate