Critics’ reviews

A Time to Kill (1996)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 54: 3 positive, 3 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of A Time to Kill

54
Positive
3
Mixed
3
Negative
2

Most critics find A Time to Kill watchable, and a fair number find it gripping: an absorbing, polished Grisham adaptation that holds attention across its length. The praise clusters almost entirely around Samuel L. Jackson, whose taut, anguished performance is singled out by reviewers on both sides of the verdict as the film’s strongest element. Kevin Spacey and Matthew McConaughey also draw notice, McConaughey chiefly for his closing speech, and several reviews credit the film with treating its charged subject forcefully.

The reservations are about method rather than craft. Several critics call the film manipulative, pushing hard for the audience’s feelings at the expense of subtlety, and a few go further, objecting to its simplified treatment of race and its apparent endorsement of vigilantism. The spread is wide: Radio Times is warmly positive, while Time Out dismisses the film outright for cultural myopia and The AV Club finds its politics troubling even while admiring the cast.

Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

Ferguson gives the adaptation a positive verdict, noting its box-office success and its role in launching Matthew McConaughey. He singles out McConaughey’s rise to stardom as a notable result of the film.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
70*

Nathan finds the film gripping and thought-provoking, though its closing hero worship weakens its ethical debate. He particularly praises Samuel L. Jackson’s taut, powerful performance.

Read the full review →
Variety
11 July 1996 · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film an absorbing, generally satisfying Grisham adaptation despite implausibilities and contrived melodrama. He praises Samuel L. Jackson’s riveting performance and the film’s polished production.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 July 1996 · Janet Maslin
60*

The review gives a mixed but somewhat favorable verdict on the courtroom drama. It singles out the film’s forceful treatment of its charged subject matter.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 July 1996 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Turan finds the film undeniably watchable but excessive, with its relentless push for audience arousal undermining subtlety. He singles out Samuel L. Jackson’s anguished, focused performance as the film’s strongest element.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 July 1996 · Roger Ebert
50*

The review regards the film as an emotionally manipulative courtroom drama. Its focus on provoking audience emotion is a central complaint.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
35*

Phipps argues that the film’s treatment of race and justice is overly simplified and its endorsement of vigilantism is troubling. He praises the principal performances, especially Samuel L. Jackson and Kevin Spacey, and singles out Matthew McConaughey’s climactic speech.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
20*

The review is sharply negative about the film’s handling of cultural issues. It faults the courtroom drama for relying heavily on cultural myopia.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate