Critics’ reviews

After Life (1999)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 79: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of After Life

79
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

The reviews lean warmly positive, and they agree on why. Most critics describe the film as humane, thoughtful and quietly moving, and the praise clusters on Kore-eda’s handling of the premise: the dead choosing a single memory to keep, and a plain, observational style that makes a metaphysical idea feel ordinary. Variety notes the mixing of professional actors and non-professionals in the cast, and several others admire the restraint with which the chosen memories are recreated rather than dressed up. The film’s thinking about memory, and about filmmaking itself, comes up in nearly every notice.

Reservations are scarce. Among the reviews whose text we could read, the spread is narrow, running from solid approval to open admiration, and nobody argues that the film is cold or slight. The two lower figures in the tally belong to reviews we could not access in full, so no specific complaint is on record. Read as a group, the critics are closer to agreement than the number suggests.

Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
90*

Parkinson finds the film a delightful, deeply humane fantasy. He singles out its careful handling of the dead’s memories and the splendid cast.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 September 1998 · festival review · Derek Elley
90*

Elley finds the film slyly humorous, original and moving, predicting strong critical support. He especially praises its humane concept and the way its casting brings together actors and non-professionals.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 October 1999 · Philip French
85*

French praises the film as thoughtful, accessible, and immensely suggestive. He singles out its meditation on memory and cinema, especially the moving discovery that one person was part of another’s happiness.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
10 August 2021 · ★★★★ · Jake Cole
80

Cole calls the film an understated masterpiece and praises its ability to make profound ideas feel relatable. He singles out its observational approach, which grounds its metaphysical premise in realism.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Joshua Klein
80*

Klein finds the film thought-provoking and touching, with a quietly moving message about memory and existence. He especially praises its mundane, naturalistic approach to recreating the dead characters’ chosen memories.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page was blocked by a browser check, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint from the review was available to assess.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 May 1999
64*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. The article text also provides no praise or complaint to report.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate