Critics’ reviews

Ali (2001)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 66: 5 positive, 5 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Ali

66
Positive
5
Mixed
5
Negative
1

The reviews lean positive, though not by much, and nearly all of them agree on where the credit belongs. Will Smith’s performance is praised almost everywhere, for the charm, the intelligence and the sharpness of the impersonation, and several critics call it the chief reason to watch. The other point of agreement is the fighting: the opening sequence and the staging of the first Liston bout are singled out repeatedly as the places where Michael Mann’s control and ambition pay off.

The reservations cluster around what the film leaves out. Several critics find it narratively loose, too restrained, and short on insight into Ali’s inner life and politics, impressive to look at but shallow underneath. The spread is wide. The New Yorker calls it a unique achievement, while The Guardian offers only faint praise, and Slant finds it emotionally and politically thin. The Ringer, looking back years later, concludes the film cannot match the scale of the life it describes.

The New Yorker
90*

The critic calls the film a unique achievement. They praise Will Smith’s performance for capturing Ali’s sharp political temperament.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
80*

The review describes Mann’s film as both visceral and immensely intelligent. It singles out the virtuoso opening and the climactic recreation for praise.

Read the full review →
Total Film
22 February 2002 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds the film slick and engrossing, though it lacks narrative coherence and leaves important aspects of Ali’s life unexplored. It praises Will Smith’s performance and especially the poetic, epic boxing sequences.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
75*

Freer finds the film riveting and praises Mann’s controlled, ambitious biopic, despite some dramatic sections feeling flat. He especially singles out Will Smith’s convincing performance and the vivid boxing sequences.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
25 December 2001 · ★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
75

Ebert regards the film as a substantial but imperfect portrait of Ali. He singles out Will Smith’s performance as a strength.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 December 2001 · Elvis Mitchell
64*

The review text is unavailable, so its verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the accessible page.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jason Caro
60

The review finds the biopic impressively mounted but less convincing when it tries to offer insight. It singles out Will Smith’s remarkable impersonation of Muhammad Ali as its chief strength.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
7 November 2001 · ★★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
50

Gonzalez finds the film stylish but emotionally and politically shallow, with its relationships and timeline poorly developed. He praises a rare moment of insight in Ali’s recognition of his cultural stature, made palpable by Will Smith’s sensitive performance.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 December 2001 · Todd McCarthy
50*

McCarthy finds the film intelligent and compelling but overly restrained, leaving Ali’s exuberance and inner life underexplored. He praises Will Smith’s commanding portrayal and the film’s vivid staging of the first Liston fight.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· Peter Bradshaw
40*

Bradshaw offers faint praise, suggesting the biopic succeeds only in limited measure. He singles out Michael Mann’s direction and Will Smith’s charm and intelligence as reasons it works as well as it does.

Read the full review →
The Ringer
6 June 2016 · Chris Ryan
55*

Ryan finds the film visually sumptuous but ultimately unable to match the scale of Ali’s life, while still making it a fitting tribute. He praises its opening sequence for capturing the convergence of Ali, Sam Cooke, Malcolm X, and the era’s larger history.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate