Critics’ reviews

All That Heaven Allows (1955)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 78: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of All That Heaven Allows

78
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to All That Heaven Allows, with praise clustering around Sirk’s expressive use of colour and composition. The melodrama is widely valued for taking ordinary emotional lives seriously, while several reviews find a perceptive challenge to social repression beneath the romance. The strongest notices see its emotional directness as a strength, rather than something that needs to be excused by looking for subtext.

Reservations concern the performances and the story’s persuasiveness, with a substantial spread between enthusiasm and qualified responses. Radio Times particularly praises Rock Hudson, while The AV Club finds his performance problematic. Variety is less moved by the story and finds Wyman’s character difficult to sympathise with, though it singles out Gloria Talbott for praise. Eye for Film admires the film but questions the ending’s reliance on coincidence. The unavailable Time Out text limits what can be said about its reservations.

The AV Club
11 June 2014 · A- · Mike D'Angelo
90

D’Angelo says the film works magnificently as melodrama, even without reading it for subtext. He especially praises Sirk’s saturated colors and geometrical compositions, while finding Hudson’s performance more problematic.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
4 April 2011 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody regards the film as one of Sirk’s great works and celebrates its democratic power. He singles out how its melodrama makes ordinary emotional life feel grand while risking—and triumphing over—ridicule.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 March 2006 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson finds the film enthralling and far more than a romance novel. He praises Sirk’s expressive visual style and its perceptive critique of bourgeois society.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Lucy Barrick
80

Barrick calls the film an exquisite melodrama. She praises the leads, especially Rock Hudson, and its sumptuous visual design.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available metadata describes the film as a glossy tearjerker centered on a troubled romance. The review text is unavailable, so its verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be established.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1954 · Variety Staff
55*

The review finds the story mildly offbeat but says it is not especially stirring, and Wyman’s character becomes difficult to sympathize with. It singles out Gloria Talbott as the standout performer.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
31 January 2008 · Chris
80*

The critic praises Sirk’s film as a major work that challenges social repression, though its ending feels too dependent on coincidence. The vivid expressionist visuals and sincere performances help make its ideals convincing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate