Critics’ reviews

Alphaville (1965)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 74: 6 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Alphaville

74
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics like Alphaville, and the positive reviews cluster around the same things: the marriage of film noir and science fiction, and the look of the thing. The praise goes to Godard’s decision to build a future out of present-day Paris, using night streets, modern office blocks and harsh contrast rather than sets, and several reviews single out the nighttime photography as the reason the film still holds up. A few also warm to the romance underneath the ideas, and to Godard folding his own philosophical preoccupations into pulp.

The spread is wide. The reservations come largely from the film’s first release: Variety finds it piquant but sketchy, more an adventurous attitude than a worked-out story, and The New York Times dismisses it almost entirely on account of its dubbing. Later reviews, from Empire onwards, treat those complaints as period noise and judge the film by its images, which is where the consensus has settled.

The New Yorker
30 May 2012 · Richard Brody
90*

Brody presents the film as a major work of romanticism and science fiction. He praises its fusion of genre conventions and cinematic references with Godard’s philosophical and personal concerns.

Read the full review →
Vulture
17 December 2023 · Bilge Ebiri
90*

Ebiri presents the film as an influential, poetic vision of the future that remains singular. He praises its eerie beauty, especially the stark nighttime imagery and the tenderness of its romantic ending.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · David Parkinson
80*

Parkinson praises Godard’s inventive blend of pulp and political allegory, finding the film enduringly effective. He especially singles out its groundbreaking visuals, which remain stunning.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 April 2014 · Los Angeles Times Film Critic
80*

The critic finds that “Alphaville” remains fresh and makes a strong connection despite its age. They praise how Godard uses language and attitude to create a distinctive science-fiction future.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 July 2019 · ★★★★ · Jake Cole
80

The review calls the film a fascinating outlier in Godard’s New Wave period and praises Kino Lorber’s Blu-ray presentation. It especially singles out the 4K transfer for revealing the beauty and detail of the film’s shadowy cinematography.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
80*

The critic presents the film as one of Godard’s most enjoyable works. They praise its dazzling blend of film noir and science fiction.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1964 · Variety Staff
60*

The review finds the film piquant but sketchy, praising Godard’s adventurous, philosophical approach while noting its intellectual, unorthodox style. It singles out the grubby Paris locations and modern buildings for creating an effective, bleak futuristic atmosphere.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
26 October 1965 · Bosley Crowther
30*

The review is negative, arguing that the film is spoiled by its dubbing. The headline singles out the dubbing as the chief complaint.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate