Critics’ reviews

Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked (2011)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 37: 0 positive, 4 mixed, 7 negative.

Back to our review of Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked

37
Positive
0
Mixed
4
Negative
7

Most critics find Chipwrecked tired and unimaginative, another round of familiar family messages and squeaky pop covers with little story or humour to carry it. Seven of the eleven reviews are negative and none is positive. Where there is praise, it clusters on the grown-ups: David Cross’s acerbic Ian is named more than once as the bright spot, and Jason Lee is credited for playing convincingly against the CGI chipmunks, with their exchanges singled out as the liveliest thing on screen.

The spread runs from grudging tolerance to outright hostility, and the gap is not wide. The kindest notices, from The Guardian and HeyUGuys, concede that small children will enjoy the cruise-ship antics and the musical numbers. Slant is the harshest, calling the film an endurance test. The songs divide critics most: The Hollywood Reporter hears a glimmer of inspiration in the Chipettes’ a cappella turns, while the Los Angeles Times finds the covers tame and uninspired.

Screen Daily
15 December 2011 · Tim Grierson
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its critical verdict is not visible. The paywalled text does not reveal what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
16 December 2011
63*

The URL identifies this as a review of the 2011 film, but the page content is blocked. The critic's verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
18 December 2011 · Philip French
60*

French finds the film more than endurable and says small children will enjoy it. He praises Jason Lee’s ability to play convincingly alongside the CGI characters.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Sue Robinson
40

Robinson finds the film jaded, with its familiar family messages and pop songs feeling tired. She singles out the entertaining exchanges between Jason Lee and David Cross as a bright spot.

Read the full review →
Variety
15 December 2011 · John Anderson
30*

Anderson finds the film largely inoffensive but unimaginative, with little story or humor. He singles out David Cross’s performance as the acerbic Ian as a bright spot.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
14 December 2011 · THR Staff
25*

The critic finds the film frantic, grating and short on charm or inventiveness. Some song choices provide a glimmer of inspiration, especially the Chipettes’ a cappella performances.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
20*

The critic dismisses the film as unoriginal and says they are not entertained. They complain that the adults in the cast and audience have little chance, while noting children may enjoy the cruise-ship adventure and salsa dance.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
16 December 2011 · Betsy Sharkey
20*

Sharkey finds the film a disappointing low point for the franchise, with little chance of rescue. She singles out the tame, uninspired music covers as a particular loss.

Read the full review →
Time Out
16 December 2011 · ★ · David Fear
20

The one-star rating indicates a strongly negative verdict. The review’s description singles out the chipmunks’ squeaky voices and their pop-song performances, including a lyric change to “Whip My Hair.”

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
15 December 2011 · ½/4 · Jaime N. Christley
12

Christley delivers a scathing verdict, calling the film an endurance test and urging readers to leave it. He complains especially about its shoddy writing and stale, unfunny jokes.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
31 December 2011 · ★★★ · Lisa Giles-Keddie
60

The review finds the film charming and lively family entertainment, despite its predictable, tame antics. It praises Simon’s Franglais adventure and the energetic musical numbers.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate