Critics’ reviews

Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel (2009)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 39: 1 positive, 3 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Alvin and the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel

39
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
5

Most critics dislike it, and only one is prepared to recommend it. The praise, such as it is, clusters on the effects: several reviews note that the computer-animated chipmunks sit convincingly among the live actors, and that the bickering between the two sets of rodents gives the film its liveliest stretches. Variety is the lone positive voice, finding it frenetic but funny with some nostalgia for grown-ups, and Radio Times has a kind word for Justin Long and Christina Applegate.

Where they part is on how much to mind. The mixed reviews settle for bland but harmless, a serviceable babysitter over the holidays. The negatives go further. The Guardian finds the shrill soundtrack close to unbearable and objects to how the Chipettes are presented; Slant calls it brain-dead, citing the thin story, wall-to-wall pop and fart jokes; Empire thinks Alvin an unsympathetic lead. Two reviews are only partly visible, though one is a one-star rating. Nobody argues it is for anyone over ten.

Variety
21 December 2009 · Joe Leydon
70*

The critic finds the sequel frenetic but funny, with broad appeal for children and some nostalgic charm for older viewers. He praises the persuasive, technically accomplished interplay between the live-action cast and CGI chipmunks.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
1 January 2010 · Brent Simon
64*

The review text is hidden behind a paywall, so its verdict is unavailable. The article’s praise or criticism cannot be determined from the visible page.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Sue Robinson
60

The review finds the sequel’s most successful element is the lively banter between rival chipmunks. It praises Justin Long and Christina Applegate for bringing energy to the lead performances.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
23 December 2009 · C- · Nathan Rabin
50

Rabin finds the film cheerfully bland and barely adequate, though serviceable as a babysitter. He singles out its recycled high-school clichés and contractually obligated performances for criticism.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
20 December 2009 · The Associated Press
35*

The critic finds the sequel stale and uninspired, though it may still offer families harmless holiday entertainment. They praise the chipmunks’ seamless integration into the live-action scenes through improved CGI.

Read the full review →
Empire
21 February 2009 · Kim Newman
20*

Newman finds the film disposable and says Alvin makes an unsympathetic lead. He singles out Alvin’s squeaked-up De Niro impersonations as especially unhelpful.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 December 2009 · Catherine Shoard
20*

Shoard gives the film a strongly negative verdict, finding its shrill sound nearly unbearable. She also objects to the franchise’s sexualized presentation of the Chipettes.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 December 2009 · ★ · Derek Adams
20

Time Out gives the film a one-star rating, indicating a negative verdict. The available page information does not reveal what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 December 2009 · Jason Clark
10*

The critic pans the film as a dispiriting, brain-dead sequel. They single out its paper-thin story, relentless pop music, and crude fart humor for criticism.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate