Critics’ reviews

American Pie 2 (2001)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 47: 1 positive, 5 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of American Pie 2

47
Positive
1
Mixed
5
Negative
5

The reviews lean towards disappointment with American Pie 2, though the returning cast earns praise even from critics who find the sequel weak. Eugene Levy is a recurring bright spot, while Seann William Scott’s comic energy and Jason Biggs’s awkward charm have their supporters. The more sympathetic reviews find enough familiar humour to make the reunion entertaining. Even some detractors credit the performances, while finding too few laughs in the material.

The main reservations concern repetition, crude jokes that feel stale, and a loose succession of incidents rather than a satisfying story. Opinion ranges widely: Empire welcomes the familiar formula and ensemble, whereas Variety finds the repetition boring and Biggs increasingly unfunny. Scott also divides critics, with his scene-stealing appeal set against complaints that Stifler has become overblown. The central disagreement is whether the cast can compensate for a sequel that offers little that is new.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Adam Smith
75*

The critic finds the sequel a funny, welcome reworking of the original. He singles out the returning ensemble, especially Seann William Scott and Eugene Levy, while noting a rare low point in Chris Klein’s subplot.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
10 August 2001 · Nathan Rabin
65*

Rabin finds the sequel lazy and uneven but says it retains enough of the original’s strengths to entertain. He singles out the cast’s charisma, especially Seann William Scott’s scene-stealing performance and Jason Biggs’s charm.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
12 August 2001 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as a review of the film, but its body is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the available text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 August 2001
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. Its headline alone does not reveal what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CSa
64*

The available page identifies this as a review but provides no readable verdict. Its description reprises a gender-role contrast, noting that the girls are again the mature, balanced ones.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Joanna Berry
60

The review gives the comedy a three-star rating, suggesting a mixed verdict. It praises the returning cast, especially Eugene Levy as Jim’s embarrassing dad.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 October 2001 · ★★ · Total Film
40

The critic finds the sequel lazy and misconceived, with stale or offensive jokes that make it an unworthy follow-up. They praise the performances of Jason Biggs, Alyson Hannigan and Eugene Levy, but say the laughs are too few.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
12 October 2001 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

Bradshaw condemns the sequel as cynical, unfunny and out of ideas. He singles out the superglue gag and the band-camp detour as especially stale and ineffectual.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 August 2001 · Robert Koehler
10*

Koehler finds the sequel a remarkably boring, repetitive cash-in that lacks the original’s energy. He singles out the film’s formulaic scenes and Jason Biggs’s increasingly unfunny performance as key problems.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
7 May 2012 · ★★ · Dave Roper
40

The critic finds the sequel flat overall, despite some awkward laughs. They fault the overblown Stifler characterization and the loose series of incidents for weakening the film.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
11 October 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
15*

The critic finds the sequel unoriginal and not funny, concluding that it is simply not cool. He singles out its crude, juvenile humor and the awkward phone-sex scene for criticism.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate