Critics’ reviews

Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom (2023)

23 reviews from 23 publications. Critics’ score 42: 4 positive, 5 mixed, 13 negative.

Back to our review of Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom

42
Positive
4
Mixed
5
Negative
13

Most critics find Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom a tired end to the DC Extended Universe, and the reviews lean firmly negative: thirteen of twenty-two are unfavourable, and only four call it a good time. What praise there is clusters almost entirely on one thing, the bickering between Jason Momoa’s Arthur and Patrick Wilson’s Orm, which even the harsher reviews tend to single out as the film’s one working part. James Wan’s energetic direction and the busy underwater design draw a second, smaller round of approval. The reservations gather around the plot, which many find muddled and recycled, and around the computer-generated imagery, which several describe as fuzzy, garish or plainly unfinished. The spread is wide. The AV Club, Paste and /Film rate it as brisk popcorn fun, while The Guardian and The Telegraph judge it close to worthless. The middle ground is thinly populated; critics either forgive it or they do not.

The AV Club
21 December 2023 · B · Matthew Jackson
77

The critic calls it a kinetic and entertaining popcorn movie that swings for the fences with fun, thanks to strong buddy chemistry between Momoa and Wilson and Wan’s energetic direction. They note the scattershot plotting as a drawback but emphasize its overall charm and spectacle.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 December 2023 · Michael Ordoña
70*

The critic finds the sequel an improvement over the original due to its lighter buddy-cop tone and focus on family, while noting the franchise’s uncertain future.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
21 December 2023 · Matt Zoller Seitz
65*

The critic calls it a fun but not great movie, praising Jason Momoa’s self-aware performance and his chemistry with Patrick Wilson as the best reasons to watch.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
21 December 2023
50*

The critic describes the sequel as breezy and unpretentious with fun buddy-movie elements and exuberant design, but ultimately underwhelming and familiar, feeling like an afterthought in the shifting DC landscape.

Read the full review →
Total Film
21 December 2023
50*

The review notes the DCEU's last outing should have tried to make more of a splash, implying it falls short as a finale.

Read the full review →
Variety
21 December 2023 · Owen Gleiberman
45*

The critic finds the film grandly scaled yet rote and glumly standard, with less wonder than the first and action that feels flat despite 3D.

Read the full review →
Empire
21 December 2023 · James Dyer
40*

The critic finds this a disappointing DCEU send-off that ignores broader mythology and loses the first film's charm in a muddled eco-fable/revenge plot. They single out the fun frenemy banter between Momoa and Wilson for praise amid the weary CGI and leaden dialogue.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
21 December 2023 · ★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
40

The critic finds the sequel a serviceable but unremarkable slice of comic-book nonsense, with the bromance between Aquaman and his brother Orm providing some light relief amid familiar superhero tropes and effects.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
21 December 2023 · Lovia Gyarkye
35*

The critic finds the sequel frustratingly committed to formula with few surprises or inspired moments in the screenplay and a lack of real stakes or risks. They single out the predictable storytelling about family and geopolitics that feels done better elsewhere.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
21 December 2023 · Christina Newland
30*

The critic concludes it's no wonder audiences are sick of superheroes, as this confusing sequel drowns in baffling plotlines and derivative storytelling. They single out the stodgy CGI and convoluted intra-tribe politics for complaint, while noting Momoa's charisma.

Read the full review →
Time Out
22 December 2023 · Dan Jolin
30*

The critic sees the final DCEU film as both fishy and foul, complaining of garish CGI, clunky dialogue and an enthusiastic but misguided bang that ends the franchise on the wrong note despite some octopus-related fun.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
21 December 2023 · 1/1/2 · David Jenkins
20

The critic calls the film aggressively unmemorable and a fumbled collage of fuzzy CGI, criticizing the unlikeable hero and rote blockbuster approach that fails to deliver any meaningful engagement.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
21 December 2023 · Peter Bradshaw
10*

The critic calls the film a terrible sequel that flatlines with tired tropes, a forgettable plot and a cast going through the motions. He singles out the blandly self-admiring performance by Jason Momoa and the dreary underwater setting for complaint.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
21 December 2023 · Robbie Collin
10*

The critic deems it the most numbingly moronic film of 2023, with brain cells dying during ugly CGI battles and poorly rendered underwater scenes. He singles out the messy computer-generated action and visual failures for complaint.

Read the full review →
The Times
21 December 2023 · ★★☆☆☆ · Kevin Maher

The critic finds the sequel deeply uninspired and symptomatic of everything stale in comic-book movies, though notes a few minor positives like Nicole Kidman on a motorised shark. He singles out the overuse of CGI and diminishing returns from Momoa’s performance for complaint.

Read the full review →
Paste
21 December 2023 · 7.1/10 · Jesse Hassenger
71

Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom ends the DCEU on its own chaotic terms with plenty of colorful spectacle but little connective tissue to a larger universe. Wan’s energetic direction and visual flair provide the main pleasures despite a disjointed production feel.

Read the full review →
/Film
21 December 2023 · 7/10 · Rafael Motamayor
70

The critic finds it a fun but flawed adventure that excels in its family-focused road trip elements and world-building but is bogged down by a weak opening and environmental messaging. Praises the Arthur-Orm dynamic and fantastical locations.

Read the full review →
Collider
21 December 2023 · 5/10 · Ross Bonaime
50

The film embraces the silliness of the original Aquaman while highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of the DCEU as a whole. The buddy comedy dynamic between Momoa and Wilson stands out as a highlight amid uneven execution.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
22 December 2023 · ★★ · David Crow
40

The critic calls the film soulless and inept, a pathetic epitaph for the DCEU that feels like a studio obligation rather than a real movie. He praises the chemistry between Momoa and Wilson as well as James Wan's visual style.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
21 December 2023 · Ian Sandwell
40*

The critic describes the sequel as a fittingly messy and choppy end to the DCEU, with a rushed plot and wasted talent despite some strong performances and visuals. He notes the tonal inconsistency and lack of substance in the action and story.

Read the full review →
Deadline
21 December 2023 · Valerie Complex
35*

The sequel veers into cartoonish territory with faulty CGI, particularly an ill-fitting Aquaman suit, and inconsistent character portrayal. It lacks narrative direction and fails to make audiences care about the franchise's future.

Read the full review →
Polygon
21 December 2023 · Matt Patches
30*

The sequel flounders with repetitive lowbrow humor and spectacle that lacks tempo or impact, feeling like a step down from the first film. Climate themes and action sequences fail to cohere into a satisfying whole.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
21 December 2023 · William Bibbani
25*

The film is a hacked-up mess with choppy editing, a tediously recycled plot, visual noise, laughable dialogue, and a story that makes little sense. It ends the DCEU on a low note that barely clears the low bar set by other recent entries in the universe.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate