Argentina 1985 (2022)

Lodge finds the film a rousing, emotionally immediate courtroom drama that uses familiar genre conventions effectively. He particularly praises Ricardo Darín’s grounded, charismatic performance and the gripping final courtroom speech.

The review finds the film an entertaining, often amusing account that resists simplistic hero-making. It praises Ricardo Darín for bringing wit and nuance to the drama’s procedural, historical, and domestic elements.

The critic finds the film humane and compelling, balancing the gravity of the crimes with everyday humor. He especially praises its vivid portrayal of Strassera’s family and relationships, which grounds the story and raises the stakes.

The critic describes the courtroom drama as a powerful account of Argentina’s war-crimes trial. They single out Ricardo Darín’s excellent performance as prosecutor Julio Strassera.

Bradshaw finds the courtroom drama emotionally heightened but handled with flair and heartfelt commitment. He singles out Ricardo Darín’s witty, careworn performance as especially compelling.

The review finds the film suspenseful and ultimately rousing despite its known outcome. It praises the storytelling’s sturdy feel and the flashes of comedy that preserve lightness amid the serious drama.

The critic finds the film conventional but stirring, arguing that its familiar courtroom framework suits its subject. They single out the harrowing witness testimony and Darín’s understated, eloquent closing argument for giving the story emotional weight.

The review presents the film as a rousing courtroom thriller with awards-season potential. It singles out Ricardo Darín’s performance as especially strong.

Linden finds the drama measured but thoughtful, with Darín grounding its account of the historic trial. She praises his restrained performance and the force of Strassera’s closing statement, while noting that the pacing and some dialogue fall flat.

The article body is blocked, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be determined. The URL identifies it as a review of Argentina 1985.

Watson finds the film a nimble, measured courtroom drama that avoids much of the genre’s schmaltz. He especially praises how Julio’s family life provides humor and emotional grounding amid the trial’s serious subject matter.

Bunbury calls the film exceptional and brilliant cinema, praising how it weaves political struggle with a human story. She singles out Ricardo Darín’s remarkable performance and the courtroom testimony scenes for their emotional force.

Keogan praises the film as a powerful, assured procedural that recounts a landmark trial without sensationalizing its horrors. She singles out the period detail and streamlined storytelling, while noting that some political context is left unexplained.

Kermode finds the film an effective, morally challenging account of the prosecution, though it assumes some familiarity with Argentina’s history. She especially praises Ricardo Darín’s layered performance and the detailed courtroom reconstruction.

The critic finds the film an effective, cathartic tribute to Argentina’s struggle for justice, despite its familiar and formally conventional approach. The performances and the film’s clear preservation of historical memory stand out for praise.

The critic finds the film powerful and well-made, but says it rushes toward its courtroom climax. Ricardo Darín’s empathetic performance is singled out for making prosecutor Julio Strassera feel human and relatable.

The review text is inaccessible, so its verdict cannot be determined. The available page provides no details about what the critic praises or criticizes.