Critics’ reviews

Au Hasard Balthazar (1966)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 87: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Au Hasard Balthazar

87
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics agree, and warmly. Eight of nine reviews are positive, and the praise clusters around Bresson’s austere direction: plain images and sounds that critics find building toward something they describe as profound, heartbreaking and sublime. The donkey is the other point of agreement. Reviewers single out its unhumanised perspective, and the film’s refusal to sentimentalise it, as the source of whatever the film has to say about people. Several read it as a religious parable, and most treat the sacred and the brutal as deliberately balanced rather than at odds.

The spread is narrow and the reservations mild. Empire finds the religious overtones heavy-handed while still calling the film intelligent and morally serious. Eye for Film and Total Film are approving rather than rapturous, praising the unsentimental treatment of cruelty and the stark meditation on existence without going further. One review could not be read in full. Nobody argues the film fails; the disagreement is only about how far to go.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Adrian Turner
100

Turner calls the film a masterpiece and a clear religious parable. He praises its remarkable range, describing it as austere, warm, grim, surreal, shocking and heartbreaking.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 June 2005 · ★★★★/4 · Eric Henderson
100

Henderson sees the film as a rare spiritual work that makes saintliness ordinary rather than elevating its characters above humanity. He praises Bresson’s dispassionate balance of the sacred and profane, especially in the donkey’s final moments among the sheep.

Read the full review →
Time Out
★★★★★ · Alexandre Prouvèze
100

The page identifies this as a five-star review, indicating a strongly positive verdict. The review text is unavailable, so no specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 February 2018 · Justin Chang
95*

Chang regards the film as a masterpiece and a profound, heartbreaking achievement. He singles out Bresson’s poetic transformation of a donkey’s brutal life into a deeply human vision.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 November 2016 · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
90*

The critic presents the film as an unconventional masterpiece, praising Bresson’s austere style for making simple images and sounds profoundly powerful. He especially singles out the donkey’s unhumanized perspective as a source of the film’s insight into human nature.

Read the full review →
Total Film
20 September 1999 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review praises the film as a stark, profound meditation on existence. It singles out the way images and sounds build toward a sublime epiphany.

Read the full review →
Empire
30 March 2006 · David Parkinson
75*

Parkinson finds the film deeply intelligent and morally resonant despite its heavy-handed religious overtones. He singles out Bresson’s restrained formal style and unsentimental performances.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict cannot be established. No praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic finds the film powerful in its unsentimental portrayal of cruelty and vulnerability. They especially praise Bresson’s refusal to compromise truth for expedience, while noting the donkey’s genuine personality.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate