Critics’ reviews

Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me (1999)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 69: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me

69
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics lean positive on Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me, with praise centred on Mike Myers’s comic warmth, the sequel’s energy and its willingness to be juvenile. Several find it funnier than the original, while the retro style, Dr. Evil’s development and Mini-Me draw particular approval. The favourable reviews generally treat familiar catchphrases and uneven jokes as tolerable costs of an amiable comedy with enough laughs to carry it.

The reservations concern repetition, thin writing and characters who work less well than others: Heather Graham attracts differing levels of enthusiasm, while Fat Bastard draws a specific objection. Variety supplies the clearest dissent, finding the performances amusing but the recycled jokes and underdeveloped writing less inspired than before. The recorded scores span a broad range, though two incomplete review texts limit what can be said about the reasoning behind the mixed notices.

Empire
30 July 1999 · Ian Nathan
80*

Nathan finds the sequel satisfyingly funny and ultimately winning, despite its repetition and weaker jokes. He singles out Mike Myers’s comic warmth and the inspired Mini-Me gag as highlights.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic says fans of the first film will love this sequel. They praise its retro style and geniality, while noting Heather Graham is an adequate replacement for Elizabeth Hurley.

Read the full review →
Total Film
30 July 1999 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The critic says the sequel is funnier than the original and a genuinely worthwhile continuation. They praise Dr. Evil’s comic development and Heather Graham’s performance, while finding Fat Bastard out of place.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
11 June 1999 · Kenneth Turan
75*

Turan finds the sequel more energetic and funnier than its predecessor, with a gratifyingly high hit rate despite its incoherence. He singles out Mike Myers’s gift for skit humor as the unifying strength that makes the juvenile jokes work.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
11 June 1999 · Janet Maslin
65*

The page would not load, so the critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaint could not be verified. The URL identifies it as a film review of the 1999 title.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available excerpt does not reveal the critic’s verdict on this film. It singles out the first film’s Swinging London gags, while noting Myers’ casting as a drawback.

Read the full review →
Variety
9 June 1999 · Dennis Harvey
40*

Harvey finds the sequel amusing but ultimately thin and less inspired than its predecessor. He praises the performances and character tics, while faulting the recycled jokes and underdeveloped writing.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
6 February 2002 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic finds the sequel better than the original and enjoyable despite its familiar catchphrases. He singles out Liz Hurley’s pre-credits cameo as genuinely funny.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate