Critics’ reviews

Away from Her (2007)

15 reviews from 15 publications. Critics’ score 78: 13 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Away from Her

78
Positive
13
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics come away admiring Away from Her, and the praise gathers in two places. Julie Christie’s performance as Fiona is singled out again and again, for its restraint, its intelligence and for making a woman with Alzheimer’s more than someone to be pitied. Sarah Polley’s writing and direction draw almost as much credit, with the reviews noting how she handles the illness, and the resentments inside a long marriage, without reaching for histrionics. Gordon Pinsent’s quieter work as the husband is also mentioned warmly.

The reservations are scattered rather than shared. Total Film finds the pacing glacial and the film too long, Empire thinks the story loses focus and the dialogue occasionally turns stagy, and The AV Club feels the out-of-order storytelling disturbs the film’s elegiac flow. Variety is alone in arguing that it is Pinsent, not Christie, who carries the film. The spread is narrow: thirteen reviews are positive, two mixed, none negative.

Evening Standard
24 September 2020 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
90*

O'Sullivan gives the film an enthusiastic appraisal, calling it a successful adaptation of Alice Munro's story. She particularly praises Sarah Polley's writing and direction, along with Julie Christie's performance.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
17 May 2007 · ★★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
88

Ebert’s verdict is positive, finding the film quietly moving. He singles out Julie Christie’s performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 March 2007 · ★★★½/4 · Nick Schager
88

Schager finds the film a mature, sensitive, and ultimately hopeful study of Alzheimer’s and its effects on a marriage. He particularly praises Julie Christie’s performance and Polley’s nuanced handling of complicated emotions.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
2 May 2007 · Michael Koresky
85*

Koresky gives the film a warmly admiring verdict, praising Sarah Polley’s empathy and grace. He singles out Julie Christie’s shrewd, articulate performance as the film’s radiating nucleus.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
14 September 2007 · Rob Mackie
85*

Mackie calls the film quietly powerful and praises its dignity, subtlety, and honesty. He singles out Julie Christie’s performance and Polley’s nuanced treatment of memory and marital resentment.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 May 2007 · B+ · Tasha Robinson
83

Robinson finds the film a subdued, moving character study, though its achronological storytelling slightly disrupts its elegiac flow. She praises the subtle performances and its willingness to observe emotions without resorting to histrionics.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 April 2007 · A.O. Scott
80*

Scott gives the film a positive verdict. He singles out Julie Christie’s performance for praise.

Read the full review →
Time Out
24 April 2007 · ★★★★ · Dave Calhoun
80

The review frames the film as a sober, straight look at an ageing married couple facing Alzheimer’s. The available page text does not reveal what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 January 2007 · festival review · The Associated Press
75*

The review finds the film deep, sensitive and emotionally affecting, while noting that its subject may limit its box-office appeal. It praises the performances and Sarah Polley’s restrained direction, especially the tender scenes that avoid sentimentality.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
20 May 2007 · David Denby
75*

Denby calls the film a minor triumph, praising its challenging intelligence rather than sentimentalizing Fiona’s illness. He singles out Julie Christie’s incisive, forceful performance for making Fiona more than an object of pity.

Read the full review →
Empire
30 March 2007 · Olly Richards
70*

Richards finds the film glum but accomplished, with its measured approach ultimately making the tragedy more affecting. He praises the leads, especially Julie Christie’s restrained and deeply sad performance, while criticizing the story’s loss of focus and occasional stagy dialogue.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 May 2007 · festival review · Dennis Harvey
70*

Harvey finds the drama admirable and intelligently focused, though its understated approach may limit its theatrical reach. He particularly praises Gordon Pinsent’s restrained performance, which carries much of the film.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 January 2008 · de.seguin@gmail.com
65*

The accessible page provides no critical verdict. It contains no readable praise or complaint about the film.

Read the full review →
Total Film
15 February 2008 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film a tasteful, intelligent character study that successfully stays with the viewer. It praises the performances while criticizing the glacial pacing and overlong running time.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
3 February 2007 · Amber Wilkinson
75*

Wilkinson finds the film emotionally powerful despite a couple of reservations. She singles out Julie Christie and Gordon Pinsent for their deeply affecting performances.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate