Critics’ reviews

Babette's Feast (1987)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 82: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Babette's Feast

82
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics warm to Babette’s Feast, and the reviews are strikingly steady across the twenty-five years they span. The praise gathers around the same table: the banquet itself, which several reviewers describe as sumptuous and regenerative, and the way Axel lets it become a quiet reckoning for villagers who have spent their lives refusing pleasure. Audran’s performance draws particular admiration, as do the restraint of the storytelling and the film’s handling of exile, self-sacrifice and thwarted love. More than one critic insists it is a parable rather than middlebrow comfort.

The reservations are few and mild. Time Out finds the film cosy and appetising but slightly complacent, pitched at less adventurous viewers, and that is the nearest thing to a dissent. Nobody argues the film is bad; the spread runs from admiring to rapturous, and the gap is mostly a matter of how much weight a gentle drama can be asked to carry.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Robyn Karney
100

Karney says the film deserved its Oscar and reached audiences beyond the limits of subtitles. She praises its ability to capture the imagination of cinema-goers everywhere.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
25 March 1988 · SHEILA BENSON
90*

Benson gives the film an enthusiastic, deeply appreciative verdict, presenting it as a tribute to artistic expression. She especially praises Axel’s delicate storytelling and the sumptuous staging of the feast.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
90*

The critic finds the film serenely joyous, poignant and funny. They especially praise Audran’s performance and the lavish banquet’s mouthwatering, regenerative effect.

Read the full review →
Empire
21 November 2012 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson gives the film a warmly positive verdict, calling it sensual and intoxicating. He singles out its impeccable production and performances for praise.

Read the full review →
The Independent
13 December 2012 · Anthony Quinn
85*

Quinn finds the film’s gentle drama still enchanting and says it is especially strong on exile, self-sacrifice and thwarted love. He also praises its evocative depiction of food, particularly the feast.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 July 2013 · ★★★★ · Bill Weber
80

Weber regards the film as a sublime, transporting parable rather than sentimental middlebrow fare. He praises the climactic dinner sequence for making Babette’s artistry a source of grace and emotional clarity.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
13 December 2012 · Peter Bradshaw
75*

Bradshaw finds the story still charming and beguiling 25 years on. He praises its transformation of a sumptuous banquet into a reckoning with the pleasures the villagers have long denied themselves.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 March 1988 · Janet Maslin
65*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. I can’t verify what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 December 2012 · ★★★ · Tom Huddleston
60

Huddleston finds the film cosy and appetising, but slightly complacent. He singles out its accessible, inviting period atmosphere while noting its familiar appeal to less adventurous viewers.

Read the full review →
HeyUGuys
19 April 2013 · ★★★★½ · Dave Roper
90

The review finds the film an excellent, affecting antidote to bombastic modern filmmaking. It especially praises the delicately handled banquet and the film’s simplicity and elegance.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate