Critics’ reviews

Barbarian (2022)

26 reviews from 26 publications. Critics’ score 82: 25 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Barbarian

82
Positive
25
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics like Barbarian a great deal. Zach Cregger’s debut is praised above all for its structure: a double-booked rental in a derelict corner of Detroit that keeps changing shape, resetting the story and the audience’s sympathies more than once. Reviewers find it scary in the middle stretch and funny where it means to be, and several credit Georgina Campbell’s lead performance and the cast more widely. The strands of social commentary, on male entitlement and urban decay, are noted approvingly, though most treat them as secondary to the scares.

The reservations gather at the end. A run of critics find the explanation behind the horror thinner than the mystery, and say the last act turns conventional or faintly silly after the tension that precedes it. The spread is narrow: only Collider is properly mixed, faulting exposition-heavy later sections, while The i Paper feels the film goes rote before the close. Little White Lies thinks the commentary rather blunt.

Los Angeles Times
7 September 2022 · Katie Walsh
90*

Writer-director Cregger delivers a fresh genre surprise in the cult movie in waiting ‘Barbarian,’ a triumph of Airbnb horror that builds bone-chilling suspense to operatic horror before cutting to new chapters and modes. It wraps multilayered contemporary social commentary in a rip-roaring, utterly horrifying flick with skull-rattling scares.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
30 October 2022
90*

The critic calls it an excellent chiller and one of the most bracingly effective of the year, with a smart structure and novel real-estate horror angle focused on a double-booked Airbnb in derelict Detroit. It flirts with humour but mostly delivers inexorable tension.

Read the full review →
Empire
28 October 2022 · Siddhant Adlakha
89*

The critic praises the film's unpredictable twists, tonal shifts, and thoughtful themes of urban decay and toxic relationships, calling it wildly unpredictable and a beguiling romp that maintains gripping intensity.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
7 September 2022 · festival review
85*

The critic highlights the inventive, nerve-shredding horror whose greatest shock is its unpredictability, with Cregger embedding the audience in the protagonist's mindset and delivering clever twists that recalibrate assumptions. Social commentary is thoughtful but secondary to the deft terrors.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 September 2022 · Critics Pick · Peter Debruge
85*

A simple premise involving a double-booked vacation rental gets downright demented in Cregger’s unpredictable and thoroughly enjoyable debut. It builds shock upon shock with an effective sense of dread and a deliciously twisted sense of humor, referencing Psycho while delivering outrageous thrills.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
7 September 2022 · B+ · Jude Dry
83

It is a clever horror thriller with Justin Long as the ultimate toxic white guy, a wild ride that is a hell of a lot of fun with a little something to say, though the final explanation feels like a mish-mosh.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 September 2022 · B+ · Leigh Monson
83

Cregger's debut is impressive, a stunning addition to the horror canon that marries the absurd and relatable with an extremely dark joke told by a master comedian, though the explanatory mythology feels a little thin.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 September 2022 · Critic’s Pick · Beatrice Loayza
83*

Cregger’s gleefully twisty horror movie is both a product of modern times and a throwback, as two strangers explore the basement of their Detroit rental home. It orchestrates a snappy spectacle that lets #MeToo, gentrification, and other elements fit like puzzle pieces into a broader nightmare.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
28 October 2022
82*

The critic describes the film as an admirably tricky horror that uses structural fake-outs to reroute expectations and sympathies. It starts as a send-up of millennial meet-cute tropes before shifting into ferocious subterranean set-pieces, with praise for strong performances especially from Richard Brake.

Read the full review →
The Times
28 October 2022 · ★★★★☆ · Ed Potton
81*

The critic describes a gleefully scary and inventive tale full of disarming twists and #MeToo undertones, using the minor pitfall of a double-booked Airbnb as a satisfying plot hook in a decayed Detroit setting.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
24 October 2022 · 3/4/3 · Charles Bramesco
80

The critic notes Cregger's use of misdirection and redefinitions of meaning through twists that expand themes of male predation and gendered violence, though the execution is seen as somewhat blunt and the subject matter perfunctory. Visual inventiveness and showman's instincts for entertainment are highlighted positively.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Patrick Cremona
80

The critic praises the cleverly constructed horror with myriad twists and turns that keep it unpredictable and engrossing. Cregger is commended for eking out tension from mundane interactions and Campbell for a magnetic performance, though some fear factor wears off by the climax.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
27 October 2022 · ★★★★ · Tim Robey
80

The critic praises the craftily structured and frighteningly tense horror-thriller, noting its grotesque urban blight setting and effective middle stretch of genuine scares from claustrophobia and dark trapping, while noting some hokier elements later.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 October 2022 · ★★★★ · Olly Richards
80

The critic calls it one of the most thrilling horror debuts in years, inventive and constantly surprising with well-timed laughs and structural timing. A small criticism is that the final punchline does not land 100 percent, letting things get slightly conventional.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 September 2022 · Frank Scheck
78*

The critic calls it a supremely gonzo horror debut that pulls out all the stops for a terrified frenzy and recalls early Wes Craven, with a perverse ride that will satisfy those who go along for it.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
8 September 2022 · Nick Allen
76*

Cregger proves himself a jack-in-the-box horror filmmaker with a double-booked Airbnb nightmare in Detroit. The film builds visceral dread through creepy mysteries and wacky reveals, even when they get dumb, with strong performances from Campbell, Skarsgård, and Long.

Read the full review →
Vulture
26 October 2022
75*

The review highlights the best scene as one that nails the horror of knowing better, praising how the film avoids the usual 'you idiot' sensation by having a character make a bad call out of moral obligation while fully aware of the danger.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
27 October 2022 · Christina Newland
68*

The critic finds it a cleverly plotted horror with solid gory scares and inventive unpredictability in its visual style and domestic setting, but notes it feels rote by the end with scares giving way to nearly-amusing violence and doesn't fully hit its target.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
28 October 2022 · ★★★★★ · Ian Sandwell
100

The critic calls it the must-watch horror movie of the year for its originality and constant subversion of expectations. They single out the unique narrative structure that switches up the story and keeps viewers on edge, along with tense set pieces and strong performances.

Read the full review →
Paste
8 September 2022 · 8.1 · Natalia Keogan
89*

The critic calls it a bloody, bold, biting, and unpredictable horror gem that delivers whiplash with shocking revelations while maintaining a biting socially conscious undercurrent about male entitlement and the threat of sexual assault. They praise the satirical precision, humor, and strong performances, especially Georgina Campbell's.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
7 September 2022
89*

The critic praises writer-director Zach Cregger for brilliantly baiting and switching in an exquisitely crafted scary story that keeps developing its twisty plot and stays one step ahead of viewers. They single out the atmospheric tension, circumstantial peril, and the cast’s body language for making the film genuinely scary and upsetting.

Read the full review →
/Film
7 September 2022 · 8.5/10 · Ryan Scott
85

The critic calls it the unexpected surprise of the year and a masterclass in tension and unpredictability. They praise its deceptively simple premise that leads to shocking, original turns, strong performances, and a mix of scares and humor without relying on tropes.

Read the full review →
Consequence
7 September 2022 · B+
83

The critic describes it as a bonkers horror favorite with compounding twists and a dark sense of humor that makes for one of the most surprising horror films of recent years. They highlight its surprising DNA with Psycho in the first act and the effective building of dread around the double-booked Airbnb premise.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 October 2022 · Joe George
80*

The critic praises the film for reinventing suburban horror for the 21st century by linking it to the long history of the genre while addressing economic and social issues like gentrification and privilege. They single out the shocking flashback sequence and its thematic depth about suburbia's dark underbelly.

Read the full review →
Polygon
9 September 2022 · Joshua Rivera
80*

The critic praises it as a lean, surprising film with effective thrills that rewards close watching through well-calibrated creative choices and recontextualization of sympathies rather than big reveals. They single out its subtle shifts in viewer sympathies and the way it makes the biggest scares psychological, in the head.

Read the full review →
Collider
7 September 2022 · B- · Chase Hutchinson
70

The critic finds the film a mixed bag of horror and humor that starts strong with effective tension and surprises but loses momentum through exposition-heavy later sections and diminishing returns. They single out the technical craft, particularly the cinematography and score, for praise while noting the journey is more impactful than the reveals.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate