Critics’ reviews

Black Book (2006)

13 reviews from 13 publications. Critics’ score 67: 6 positive, 6 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Black Book

67
Positive
6
Mixed
6
Negative
1

Most critics take Black Book as a lively return to form for Paul Verhoeven: a brisk, twisting resistance thriller that is more entertaining than respectable. The praise clusters around Carice van Houten, whose performance is singled out in nearly every review as the thing holding the film together, with Sebastian Koch’s work opposite her noted more than once. The reviews also tend to credit the film’s refusal of moral clarity, its view of collaborators and resisters as equally compromised, and Verhoeven’s taste for the outrageous.

The reservations are about plot and plausibility. Several critics find the twists pile up past the point of credibility, and Slant Magazine argues the plotting is mechanical and the characters thin. The spread is fairly wide, from near-raves to one sharp dissent: The New Yorker’s Anthony Lane dismisses it as shallow soap opera with a sanitised view of wartime suffering, though even he admires van Houten.

Little White Lies
8 January 2007 · 3/5/4 · David Jenkins
100

Jenkins finds the film a thrilling, morally unsettling return to form for Verhoeven. He particularly praises Carice van Houten’s committed performance and the film’s relentless plot twists.

Read the full review →
Total Film
19 January 2007 · ★★★★ · Total Film
80

The review finds Verhoeven revitalised, calling the film a brisk, gripping thriller despite occasional pacing and tension problems. It particularly praises Carice van Houten’s bold performance and the story’s twists and moral complexity.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 September 2006 · festival review · Derek Elley
80*

Elley finds the film an entertaining, technically polished and emotionally complex resistance thriller. He particularly praises Carice van Houten’s performance and her chemistry with Sebastian Koch.

Read the full review →
Empire
12 October 2006 · Ian Nathan
70*

Nathan finds the film an implausible but memorable and passionate wartime drama, ultimately worth seeing. He praises its morally complex view of the Resistance and Nazis, conveyed through Verhoeven’s outrageous comic sensibility.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 May 2007 · Rob Mackie
70*

Mackie finds the film a rollicking, passionate thriller, though it does not reach the heights of The Pianist. He praises the complexity brought to the central relationship by Carice van Houten and Sebastian Koch.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
65*

The critic finds the war epic direct and compelling, though overly long. Carice Van Houten is singled out for carrying the film, while its many twists keep the story engaging.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 September 2006 · Lee Marshall
64*

The paywall hides the critic’s verdict and the specific element singled out for praise or complaint. The available page confirms a review, but does not provide enough text to describe its assessment.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
4 April 2007
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint can be verified from the available content.

Read the full review →
Time Out
19 October 2006 · Ben Walters
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review, but its critical verdict is not visible. The available description introduces Rachel but reveals no discernible praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
2 February 2007 · ★★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
62

Gonzalez argues that the film’s mechanical plotting and limited emotional depth may disappoint, despite its abundant intrigue. He praises its voluptuous direction but finds the characters archetypal and the protagonist’s sexual agency confusingly handled.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
4 April 2007 · Nick Pinkerton
60*

Pinkerton finds the film an entertaining, morally ambiguous wartime yarn, though its filmmaking and increasingly tangled plot fall short of Verhoeven’s best. He praises its refusal of moral clarity, especially in its portrayal of compromised survivors and collaborators.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
1 April 2007 · Anthony Lane
15*

Lane strongly condemns the film as shallow, soap-operatic historical drama. He singles out its sanitized depiction of wartime suffering, despite praising Carice van Houten’s performance.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
2 May 2007 · Caro Ness
90*

The critic finds the film immensely absorbing and enjoyable, praising its pace and nuanced treatment of wartime morality. Carice van Houten’s performance is singled out as mesmerising, with Sebastian Koch’s portrayal also praised.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate