Critics’ reviews

Body of Lies (2008)

19 reviews from 19 publications. Critics’ score 55: 5 positive, 9 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Body of Lies

55
Positive
5
Mixed
9
Negative
5

The consensus on Body of Lies is mixed: the reviews find capable performances and technical polish, but less agreement that these make a satisfying political thriller. Praise clusters around Mark Strong’s controlled, unsettling presence and Leonardo DiCaprio’s energy, with even several detractors finding the actors stronger than the material. Ridley Scott’s handling of violence and action earns approval from some critics, though others find the staging detached or routine.

The spread is wide, with Den of Geek enjoying the excitement and DiCaprio–Crowe banter, while Variety argues that formulaic action squanders a promising premise. Reservations centre on confused or predictable plotting, thin character motivations and political observations that do not go far enough. Even favourable reviews question how much the film understands its subject; the sharper dissenters see its reliance on familiar thriller conventions as the reason it disappoints.

The AV Club
9 October 2008 · B · Keith Phipps
77

Phipps finds the film solid and timely but ultimately less memorable than its promise. He praises its clear storytelling and Crowe’s sly performance, while faulting Scott’s polite distance from the action and human drama.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
1 October 2008 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

Honeycutt finds the film an unsettling, largely convincing spy thriller, though its central character’s motivations are unclear. He praises Leonardo DiCaprio’s energetic performance and the film’s superb technical credits.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 October 2008 · David Denby
70*

Denby finds the thriller smart, urgent, and insightful, though it ultimately feels like a virtuosic exercise that cannot fully grasp its subject. He particularly praises Ridley Scott’s command of space and violence and the strong performances, especially Mark Strong’s and Leonardo DiCaprio’s.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page content is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No praise or complaint can be verified from the available text.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
3 October 2008 · Mike Goodridge
64*

The page identifies this as a review of Ridley Scott’s 2008 film, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the accessible page.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
10 October 2008
64*

The review's verdict is unavailable in the accessible page. Its specific praise or criticism cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · John Ferguson
60

Ferguson finds the political thriller underwhelming and less than the sum of its parts. He notes its star cast, Ridley Scott’s direction and William Monahan’s script, but says the promising combination does not deliver.

Read the full review →
Time Out
18 November 2008 · ★★★ · Trevor Johnston
60

The printed three-star rating indicates a mixed-to-positive verdict. The accessible page metadata highlights the high stakes facing DiCaprio’s CIA operator, but gives no specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Total Film
21 October 2008 · ★★★ · Jonathan Crocker
60

The review finds the political thriller overloaded and undercooked, with DiCaprio carrying it while Crowe coasts. It praises Mark Strong’s screen presence and Scott’s explosive action, which propel a gripping final half-hour.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 October 2008 · ★★/4 · Nick Schager
50

Schager finds the film’s political commentary undercut by dull thriller conventions and predictable plotting. He praises Mark Strong’s suave, dapper performance, while faulting the blandly staged action and melodramatic finale.

Read the full review →
Empire
23 October 2008 · Ian Nathan
35*

Nathan finds the film visually enthralling but ultimately garbled and badly in need of a coherent plot. He praises Scott’s striking visual style while faulting the impatient, jargon-heavy script and scattered subplots.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
30*

The critic finds the thriller hollow and unconvincing despite its slick urgency. DiCaprio and Crowe are praised for outstripping the material, while the plot and Roger’s characterization draw complaints.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
23 November 2008 · Philip French
25*

French finds the film slick, shallow and simplistic, arguing that it adds little to understanding its subject. He singles out Mark Strong’s performance as the film’s redeeming feature.

Read the full review →
Variety
2 October 2008 · Todd McCarthy
10*

McCarthy finds the film contrived and formulaic, with an overly conventional climax that undermines its promising premise. He praises the vivid scenes between DiCaprio and Mark Strong, while faulting the film for choosing Hollywood action conventions over a more absorbing, provocative story.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
14 November 2008 · ★★★★ · Christian Forbes
80

Forbes calls the film an exciting, enjoyable thriller and recommends seeing it. He praises DiCaprio’s sympathetic performance and the banter between him and Russell Crowe.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
21 November 2008 · Richard Mellor
75*

Mellor finds the film a riveting, uneasy thriller, though he questions the pleasure of its entertainment value. He particularly praises Mark Strong’s sleek, unsettling performance as Hani.

Read the full review →
/Film
14 October 2008 · Slashfilmcast
64*

The podcast includes a review of Body of Lies, but the page does not reveal its verdict. It says the hosts turn an about-face on Ridley Scott, without identifying a specific element they praise or criticize.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
16 November 2008 · Simon Reynolds
60*

The critic finds the film gripping and insightful but ultimately a slight misfire. They praise its brutal, distinctive view of espionage while faulting its slow first half and underdeveloped romance.

Read the full review →
Paste
15 October 2008 · Jeremy Medina
35*

Medina finds the film passable as a thriller but ultimately heavy-handed and lacking intelligence. He singles out the visceral terrorist bombings as effective, while criticizing the film’s collapse into a gruesome climax.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate