Critics’ reviews

Boomerang (1992)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 53: 1 positive, 5 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Boomerang

53
Positive
1
Mixed
5
Negative
2

The consensus on Boomerang is lukewarm rather than hostile. Most critics find a slick, intermittently funny sex comedy with a decent run of laughs, and the praise clusters firmly around the supporting cast, who are credited with giving the film most of its energy. Variety singles out Geoffrey Holder, John Witherspoon, Grace Jones and Eartha Kitt as scene stealers, and Radio Times says much the same of the ensemble. Murphy himself is thought to be in good form, with Empire particularly enjoying his turn as a lovesick fool.

The reservations are about shape and about Murphy. The reviews call it overlong, patchy and, in the harsher cases, weighed down by shallow, sexist characters. The spread is wide, from warm to dismissive. The Los Angeles Times is the sharpest dissenter, arguing that Murphy’s move towards romantic leads squanders his comic gifts and that he will not play the cad the story needs.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Lloyd Bradley
70*

Bradley finds the comedy slick and often very funny, though Murphy’s egotism holds it back. He especially praises Murphy’s transformation into a lovesick fool and the lively supporting comedy around him.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page shows only a browser-check message, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. It provides no information about what the review praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
13 July 1992 · Michael Sragow
64*

The issue listing identifies a review of “Boomerang,” but the review’s verdict is not available on this page. It provides no praise or complaint about the film.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
1 July 1992 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. The available text does not reveal what the review praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Joanna Berry
60

Berry calls the comedy amiable but slightly overlong, with Murphy in good form. She singles out the supporting performances for giving the film a buzz.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· SGr
50*

The critic finds the sex comedy patchy. They single out its role-reversal premise, in which the ad-man experiences being a sex object.

Read the full review →
Variety
29 June 1992 · Lawrence Cohn
30*

Cohn finds the comedy ill-fitting and weighed down by sexist, shallow characters, despite several funny scenes. He praises the supporting cast and singles out Geoffrey Holder, John Witherspoon, Grace Jones, and Eartha Kitt as scene stealers.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
1 July 1992 · Kenneth Turan
20*

Turan finds the film listless and frustrating, arguing that Eddie Murphy’s shift toward romantic leading-man roles squanders his comic talent. He singles out Murphy’s unwillingness to play the flawed cad the story requires as a central problem.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate