Critics’ reviews

Brexit: The Uncivil War (2019)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 60: 5 positive, 1 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Brexit: The Uncivil War

60
Positive
5
Mixed
1
Negative
2

Most critics find Brexit: The Uncivil War an engaging, brisk political drama, with praise clustering around Benedict Cumberbatch’s performance as Dominic Cummings. The campaign strategist emerges as a compelling, sometimes ambiguous figure, and several reviews admire how the film makes campaign tactics absorbing. James Graham’s clear, fast-moving writing earns approval, while the attention to data manipulation, misinformation and social media targeting gives the drama much of its force.

The spread is wide, however, and the reservations concern how much the film explains beneath that busy surface. Even favourable reviews note limited scope and cheap dramatic touches. Variety praises Cumberbatch but finds too many explanations competing for attention; Consequence values the data-mining material while questioning the treatment of racism and xenophobia. The Guardian offers the sharpest dissent, arguing that the film is irresponsible in its handling of misinformation and gives Cummings prominence at the expense of other characters and important issues.

The i Paper
7 January 2019 · ★★★★ · Gerard Gilbert
80

The critic finds the drama hugely engaging but says it is unlikely to change anyone’s mind about Brexit. They single out its compelling portrayal of Dominic Cummings’s outsider campaign and the way it draws viewers’ sympathies toward Vote Leave.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
8 January 2019 · Susannah Butter
75*

Butter finds the drama pacy, thought-provoking and absorbing, with something to enjoy regardless of how viewers voted. She particularly praises its nuanced portrayal of Dominic Cummings and the performances that bring the campaign’s characters to life.

Read the full review →
Empire
7 January 2019 · James Dyer
70*

Dyer finds the drama a chilling and compelling account of the data-driven Brexit campaign. He singles out its focus on data manipulation and misinformation as an alarming indictment of modern politics.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 January 2019 · Tim Goodman
70*

The critic finds the film briskly entertaining and relevant, despite its limited scope and the referendum’s ongoing complexity. He praises Benedict Cumberbatch’s lead performance and James Graham’s clear, fast-moving writing.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
18 January 2019 · Troy Patterson
70*

Patterson finds the film a crisp political procedural and praises its portrayal of Dominic Cummings as an ambiguous, destructive strategist. He singles out Benedict Cumberbatch’s performance, while noting the film’s weakness for cheap dramatic touches.

Read the full review →
Variety
16 January 2019 · Daniel D'Addario
35*

The critic says the film falls short of its promise and lacks focus. He praises Cumberbatch’s portrayal of Dominic Cummings but faults the film for treating too many explanations of Brexit as equally important.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 January 2019 · Lucy Mangan
20*

Mangan judges the drama superficial and irresponsible, saying it failed its duty not to add to misinformation. She objects that it elevates Cummings while reducing others to ciphers and skims over important issues.

Read the full review →
Consequence
17 January 2019 · Caroline Siede
60*

The critic finds the film engaging but ultimately glossy and shallow, with a breadth-over-depth approach that leaves it hollow. She praises its exploration of data-mining and social media micro-targeting, while faulting its smug tone and treatment of racism and xenophobia.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate