Critics’ reviews

Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason (2004)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 48: 1 positive, 5 mixed, 4 negative.

Back to our review of Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason

48
Positive
1
Mixed
5
Negative
4

The reviews lean mixed to negative, with praise clustering around the returning cast rather than the sequel’s story. Renée Zellweger’s comic performance and Hugh Grant’s delivery provide the most consistent pleasures, even for critics who find the material weak. The more receptive reviews enjoy the familiar romance and find enough laughs to forgive the repetition. Few, though, suggest that the sequel gives Bridget much fresh ground to cover.

The divide is over how far that familiarity remains enjoyable. Some find a safe but entertaining reprise; others see stale jokes, thin plotting and a heroine whose insecurity has become exhausting. Eye for Film offers the clearest support, praising the craft, physical comedy and unapologetic romance. Slant Magazine objects more sharply to the comedy’s treatment of Thai women, finding it politically callous. The spread is broad, but enthusiasm is scarce.

Screen Daily
28 October 2004 · Geoffrey Macnab
64*

The accessible page identifies this as a review, but its critical verdict is unavailable. The paywall shell does not reveal what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· DC
64*

The available text gives no clear verdict, noting only that the critic cannot fully compare the sequel with the original. It does not reveal a specific point of praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Brian Pendreigh
60

Pendreigh suggests the sequel plays it safe by sticking closely to the original’s formula. The excerpt highlights Bridget’s relationship troubles and renewed attraction to Daniel, but offers no specific praise.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
25 February 2005 · Rob Mackie
60*

Mackie finds the sequel unnecessary but quite entertaining, with its appeal rooted in indulgence of familiar romantic pleasures. He praises the casting and a nice twist, but criticizes the haphazard use of familiar music.

Read the full review →
Total Film
12 November 2004 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The critic finds the sequel funny but overfamiliar and thinly stretched. Zellweger’s charisma and Grant’s comic performance are singled out for praise, while the Thai-jail interlude draws criticism.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Caroline Westbrook
35*

Westbrook finds the sequel a hit-and-miss retread that is often dragged down by weak plotting and familiar jokes. She praises Renée Zellweger’s comic performance and Hugh Grant’s return as a villain, while noting the film’s attractive locations.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 November 2004 · ★/4 · Ed Gonzalez
25

Gonzalez pans the film as witless and politically callous. He especially condemns its Thai-prison sequence for turning the suffering of local women into a backdrop for Bridget’s antics.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 November 2004 · Keith Phipps
25*

Phipps finds the sequel stale and tedious, largely repeating the first film instead of developing new ideas. He singles out Hugh Grant’s witty delivery as a bright spot amid the weak material and Bridget’s exhausting insecurity.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Nina Caplan
20*

Caplan finds the sequel disappointing and says Bridget has become a self-destructive parody of her former self. She singles out the lack of decent jokes, noting that even the film’s copied fight scene is a highlight.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
13 November 2004 · Angus Wolfe Murray
70*

The critic finds the sequel well-crafted, funny and unapologetically romantic, with Renée Zellweger delivering an inspired comic performance. He praises the ski-slope antics but questions why so many men fall for Bridget, and wishes there were more of Colin Firth and Hugh Grant.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate