
The reviews lean towards a qualified welcome for Bridget Jones’s Baby, with praise clustering around Renée Zellweger’s warmth, vulnerability and comic timing. Many critics find that a more mature, comfortable Bridget gives the sequel a reason to exist beyond familiarity. Emma Thompson’s performance is another recurring pleasure, while several reviews credit the ensemble and physical comedy with keeping the laughs coming despite a thin story. Even some sceptical notices find the leads worth watching.
The spread is wide, however, from enthusiastic approval to outright disappointment. Reservations centre on the stretched plot, familiar romantic-comedy conventions and uneven characterisation. Critics also disagree about Bridget herself: some welcome her growth, while Digital Spy argues that she has become aspirational rather than relatable. The Evening Standard notably faults Zellweger while praising Colin Firth. At the harsher end, Slant Magazine objects to the shallow romantic setup and relentless pop songs.
E
Empire
6 September 2016 · Terri White
85*
The review finds the film warm, witty and more than a match for the original, despite occasional credibility gaps. It especially praises the chemistry between Renée Zellweger and returning director Sharon Maguire, and Emma Thompson’s scene-stealing performance.
Read the full review →L
Los Angeles Times
15 September 2016 · Katie Walsh
85*
Walsh finds the third installment warmly satisfying and says Bridget’s growth makes it feel current rather than recycled. She particularly praises Renée Zellweger’s charming performance and the film’s embrace of Bridget as desirable and comfortable in her own skin.
Read the full review →L
Little White Lies
10 September 2016 · 3/4/3 · Adam Woodward
80
The critic finds the sequel agreeably optimistic, faithful to its characters and very funny, though conventional. He praises Bridget’s relatable acceptance of her flaws and consistency over time.
Read the full review →T
Time Out
8 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Cath Clarke
80
The review says the third film is genuinely funny and benefits from a more content, wiser Bridget. It singles out Renée Zellweger’s return as part of what makes this installment work.
Read the full review →T
Total Film
5 September 2016 · ★★★★ · Jane Crowther
80
Crowther finds it a warm, witty and welcome return that updates Bridget without losing her appeal. She especially praises Emma Thompson’s script polish and the film’s sharp, relevant comedy, though she faults its overly traditional ending.
Read the full review →R
Radio Times
5 September 2016 · Stella Papamichael
70*
The review describes the comedy sequel as one that delivers. It singles out Zellweger’s heroine’s pregnancy and uncertainty about the father.
Read the full review →E
Evening Standard
16 September 2016 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
65*
O’Sullivan finds the film uneven and faults Zellweger’s performance, but ultimately says it is worth seeing. She especially praises Colin Firth’s heartfelt comic turn, with Emma Thompson and Sarah Solemani also singled out for strong performances.
Read the full review →V
Variety
5 September 2016 · Catherine Bray
65*
Bray finds the film a likable, sincere improvement on the second installment, though it falls short of the original and is not a comedy for the ages. She praises Renée Zellweger’s warm, vulnerable performance and Emma Thompson’s restrained comic delivery.
Read the full review →S
Screen Daily
5 September 2016 · Fionnuala Halligan
64*
The page identifies this as a review, but the review text is behind a paywall. Its verdict and any specifically praised or criticized element cannot be determined from the accessible text.
Read the full review →The page could not be accessed, so the critic's verdict is unavailable. No specific praise or complaint can be verified.
Read the full review →G
The Guardian
5 September 2016 · ★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
60
Bradshaw finds the film a solid, satisfying comeback and a better outing than its predecessor. He singles out the hospital revolving-door slapstick for its large-scale physical comedy.
Read the full review →I
IndieWire
5 September 2016 · C · Demetrios Matheou
57
Matheou finds the sequel passable but weighed down by a thin, stretched plot and familiar rom-com tropes. He praises Renée Zellweger for making Bridget’s more mature characterization feel believable while preserving her quirks and sweetness.
Read the full review →V
Vulture
20 September 2016 · David Edelstein
55*
Edelstein finds the film patchy but surprisingly funny, an entertaining and uneven return to the series. He praises Renée Zellweger’s performance and the heroine’s grounded, chaotic character, while finding the mix of feminist and screwball-sitcom ideas hard to parse.
Read the full review →H
The Hollywood Reporter
5 September 2016 · Leslie Felperin
35*
Felperin finds the film more entertaining than a disastrous reboot but ultimately emotionally hollow and disappointing. She singles out Emma Thompson’s comic timing and performance as a particular delight.
Read the full review →S
Slant Magazine
16 September 2016 · ★/4 · Eric Henderson
25
Henderson gives the film a sharply negative review, finding its romantic setup shallow and repetitive. He particularly faults the relentless pop-song needle-drops, which he says make the film feel like a playlist rather than a movie.
Read the full review →N
The New Yorker
15 September 2016 · Anthony Lane
25*
Lane finds the film increasingly embarrassing and complains that it treats Bridget’s journalism career with disdain. He praises Colin Firth’s comic timing, which helps rescue laughs from stale scenes.
Read the full review →R
The Ringer
16 September 2016 · Amanda Dobbins
90*
Dobbins calls the film a delight and argues that romantic comedies deserve more sequels like it. She praises its charm and romantic set pieces, while criticizing the unexplained changes to Bridget’s life and appearance.
Read the full review →The critic finds the sequel lively and funny, and says Zellweger makes Bridget a hugely sympathetic character. They single out her bravura comic performance and the well-timed live-news mishaps for praise.
Read the full review →The review is warmly positive, finding the film charming and Bridget’s return a joy. It especially praises Renée Zellweger’s infectious performance and physical comedy, while noting the film’s lack of diversity as a reservation.
Read the full review →C
Consequence
15 September 2016 · Allison Shoemaker
67*
Shoemaker finds the familiar romcom more enjoyable than its stale conventions suggest, though it is not exceptional. She especially praises Renée Zellweger’s vulnerable, charming performance, which gives the material depth.
Read the full review →E
Eye for Film
18 September 2016 · Anne-Katrin Titze
65*
Titze finds the film charming and forgiving, though parts become tedious and its supporting characters often feel like caricatures. She praises Zellweger’s impeccable comic timing and the sincere chemistry between the leads.
Read the full review →D
Den of Geek
12 September 2016 · ★★★ · Simon Brew
60
Brew finds the film a funny, welcome improvement that succeeds despite its familiar, thin plot. He praises Zellweger’s return and the ensemble’s comic timing, while noting Patrick Dempsey is short-changed.
Read the full review →D
Digital Spy
16 September 2016 · Rosie Fletcher
50*
Fletcher finds the film packed with laughs and worthwhile in its handling of motherhood, but says it no longer feels like the Bridget audiences knew. She praises its female perspective and the comic performances, while lamenting that Bridget has become aspirational rather than relatable.
Read the full review →P
Paste
16 September 2016 · 3.5/10 · Jim Hemphill
35
Hemphill finds the film a sloppy, overlong romantic comedy made watchable by its leads. He praises Renée Zellweger’s winning performance and Bridget’s happiness at the ending, despite the film’s weak craft and underdeveloped story.
Read the full review →Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate