Critics’ reviews

Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget (2023)

21 reviews from 21 publications. Critics’ score 69: 9 positive, 2 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget

69
Positive
9
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics like Chicken Run: Dawn of the Nugget without loving it. The praise clusters almost entirely on Aardman’s stop-motion craft: the expressive chickens, the detailed sets and the heist set-pieces built on a Mission: Impossible template are singled out again and again, and several reviews find the action bolder in scope than the original’s. The reservations cluster just as clearly. Many find the story repeats the first film’s beats, the jokes land less often, and the whole thing lacks the original’s spark, with the voice recasts a recurring complaint. The spread is fairly wide. The Telegraph calls it brilliant and uproarious and The AV Club reckons it more fun than the first film, while The Guardian finds it undercooked and short of fresh ideas. Slant Magazine is the notable dissenter on craft, seeing a flat look and bland design where nearly everyone else sees a case for the handmade approach.

The Telegraph
15 December 2023
85*

The critic calls it a brilliant, uproarious sequel that moves the story on with thrilling infiltration missions and mind-control schemes, drawing on the golden age of British comics and spy capers.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 December 2023 · B+ · Luke Y. Thompson
83

A rollicking animated followup that's even more fun than the original, using a Mission: Impossible template with strong teamwork and gadgets. The emotional hook is stronger in the finale grudge match with Mrs. Tweedy.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 October 2023 · festival review · Peter Debruge
80*

The film delivers a delightful return to Aardman’s stop-motion style with an inventive Mission: Impossible-style plot. The critic praises the seamless animation, cheeky humor and detailed craftsmanship.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 December 2023 · Alissa Wilkinson
70*

The sequel largely repeats the beats and characters of the original film. The critic highlights the expressive stop-motion chickens as the source of its comic appeal.

Read the full review →
Vulture
15 December 2023 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Might not fully capture the magic of the original but is still fun, with visual comedy and daffy engineering as highlights. It is baggier, not as funny, and drags in parts but achieves its goal of entertaining kids and adults.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
4 December 2023 · ★★/4 · David Robb
50

The film mostly fails to make a convincing case for Aardman’s old-school artisanal approach, with bland design and a flat look. It plods along as a functional joke vehicle fueled mostly by fond memories of the original.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
10 December 2023
40*

The critic finds the sequel disappointingly undercooked and lacking fresh ideas compared to the original, though not entirely bad. The synthetic color palette and lack of new jokes are singled out for complaint.

Read the full review →
Empire
5 December 2023 · John Nugent

It is a gorgeously realised, resolutely British little adventure that retains Aardman's artisanal craft while adding bolder scope and Mission: Impossible-style set-pieces, delivering silly, witty family fun.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
14 October 2023 · festival review

Aardman’s long-awaited sequel looks set to become a family favourite by sticking with the successful formula and trading on family-friendly humour. It is a familiar, well-executed coming-of-age narrative with impressive stop-motion craft.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
17 October 2023 · festival review

The long-awaited sequel is at its best when it lets Aardman’s handcrafted charm shine through sprightly action, silly puns and visual gags. Connoisseurs may crave a more intricate story, but most family audiences will be sated.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 October 2023 · festival review · Leslie Felperin

The critic finds it a worthy but not especially meaty sequel, better suited to little kids and grandparents than savvier viewers. It sticks closely to the Aardman look with situational humor but lacks cackle-worthy one-liners and has a predictable last act.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
15 December 2023 · Francesca Steele

The sequel lacks the original's spark and belly laughs, feeling more like genial chuckling and film-by-committee, though it remains decent festive entertainment with a lively voice cast and British charm.

Read the full review →
The Times
6 December 2023 · ★★★☆☆ · Kevin Maher

The review notes the film is technically impressive and witty in places but ultimately falls short of recapturing the original's magic after the long wait. Voice recasts and narrative choices are highlighted.

Read the full review →
Total Film
14 October 2023

This charming, weird and enjoyable sequel is another feather in Aardman's cap, rallying the flock against fast food in a filmic riff-filled adventure that shines once it leaves the island sanctuary.

Read the full review →
NME
14 December 2023 · ★★★★ · Paul Bradshaw
80

The critic finds the sequel a fun, warm Aardman family film with inventive set pieces and cosy charm that still delivers essential holiday viewing. They note it has too much Netflix polish and lacks some of the original's spark.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
15 December 2023 · Ian Sandwell
75*

The critic calls it a worthy, funny and brilliantly crafted follow-up that captures quintessential Aardman spirit and scales up the action effectively. They single out the controversial voice cast changes as the main element that prevents it from being perfect.

Read the full review →
/Film
13 December 2023 · 7.5/10 · Josh Spiegel
75

The review finds it an enjoyable but slightly reheated sequel, praising the stop-motion animation and action sequences while noting the script feels less clever and the setup familiar.

Read the full review →
Film Stories
14 October 2023 · festival review · James Harvey
70*

The critic praises the heist premise and Aardman's animation and humor, but notes it lacks the original's narrative tightness and emotional depth. It honors the legacy well as a fun, imaginative sequel.

Read the full review →
Collider
12 December 2023 · 5/10 · Emma Kiely
50

The critic finds the sequel disappointing with a dull, unoriginal plot and less charming characters than the original, though the Aardman animation remains spectacular.

Read the full review →
Deadline
14 October 2023 · festival review · Damon Wise

The critic finds the sequel refreshing and cleverly modern family entertainment that works to a formula without feeling committee-written. They single out the playful Mission: Impossible vibe bolstered by the score.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
13 December 2023

The critic finds it an uninspired sequel that's disappointing and serviceable but lacking wit and originality. They single out the borrowed ideas and uninspired giggles.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate