Critics’ reviews

Cléo from 5 to 7 (1962)

9 reviews from 9 publications. Critics’ score 83: 8 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Cléo from 5 to 7

83
Positive
8
Mixed
1
Negative
0

The reviews are almost uniformly warm. Most critics place the film among the key works of the French New Wave and praise Varda’s Paris above everything else: the streetscapes shot in natural light, the overheard fragments of city life, and the way one woman’s anxious two-hour wait becomes a way of looking at everything around her. Jean Rabier’s photography is singled out more than once, and several notices admire how freely Varda handles time, space, colour and genre, including the playful film-within-a-film.

Reservations are thin and the spread is narrow, with most scores clustered in the eighties and nineties. The Evening Standard is the coolest of the modern notices, valuing the film chiefly as a record of a vanished era, while Slant notes that it resists being claimed as either a feminist or an anti-feminist work. The single mixed review, Bosley Crowther’s for The New York Times in 1962, is the only one from the film’s first release, and its reasoning is not available to us.

Slant Magazine
12 July 2003 · ★★★★/4 · Eric Henderson
100

The critic finds the film a lively, intellectually rich work that resists easy feminist or anti-feminist categorization. He especially praises Varda’s vivid compositions and distinctive vision of early-1960s Paris.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2010 · David Parkinson
90*

The review praises the film as a brilliant, audacious achievement of the French New Wave. It singles out Varda’s inventive manipulation of time, space, colour and genre.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
29 March 2002 · Keith Phipps
90*

Phipps praises the film as a key work of the French New Wave and a brilliant example of Varda’s filmmaking. He singles out how Varda uses Cléo’s anxious wait to reveal the world around her and her changing sense of self.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 April 2010 · Peter Bradshaw
85*

Bradshaw calls the film a brilliant, pioneering work of the French New Wave. He praises its beautiful, thrilling Paris streetscapes and the way the tarot scene and overheard city fragments build atmosphere.

Read the full review →
The Independent
9 October 2010
80*

The Independent’s capsule is warmly positive about Varda’s film. It singles out her technical virtuosity and the film’s playful film-within-a-film.

Read the full review →
Time Out
27 April 2010 · ★★★★ · Wally Hammond
80

The review is positive about Varda’s film. It singles out the beauty of Paris’s natural light, enhanced in the new print.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012
70*

The piece is positive about Varda’s film, calling it a document of a lost-past era. It praises Jean Rabier’s vivid, intense cinematography of Paris.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
5 September 1962 · Bosley Crowther
65*

The review’s verdict and specific praise or criticism are unavailable in the blocked page. No readable discussion identifies what the critic singled out.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
2 April 2010 · Jeff Robson
85*

Robson calls the film an astonishing debut and a significant work, warmly recommending it to both newcomers and returning viewers. He especially praises Varda’s vivid, impressionistic portrait of Paris and Corinne Marchand’s convincing character journey.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate