Critics’ reviews

Click (2006)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 55: 1 positive, 7 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Click

55
Positive
1
Mixed
7
Negative
3

The consensus on Click is mixed, with critics finding promise in its remote-control premise but uneven results from its blend of broad comedy and family sentiment. Praise clusters around the idea’s inventive, sometimes nightmarish possibilities and Christopher Walken’s performance, which several reviews identify as a bright spot. Some also find warmth and emotional force beneath the cruder jokes, though enthusiasm for Adam Sandler’s performance is limited.

The sharpest divide concerns the sentimentality: what moves some critics strikes others as sugary or overearnest. Empire is the most favourable, finding an amiable, moving comedy despite an uneven first half and an overfilled script. Variety is much harsher on the comedy but still values the straight-played family drama, so even a negative verdict contains substantial praise. Radio Times finds Sandler unusually unlikeable and the supporting cast hampered, while other reviews respond to his vulnerability.

Empire
25 August 2006 · Sam Toy
70*

The review finds Click an amiable, moving comedy that works despite its uneven first half. It praises Kate Beckinsale’s performance and says the overfilled script could have been more streamlined.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
23 June 2006 · John Hazelton
64*

The page confirms a review, but the review text is inaccessible. Its verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the available text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 June 2006
64*

The page is inaccessible, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is available from the text provided.

Read the full review →
Time Out
26 September 2006 · Trevor Johnston
64*

The available page text does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also does not show what the critic singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
22 June 2006 · ★★½/4 · Roger Ebert
62

Ebert finds the comedy amusing at first but says it falters as it turns sentimental. He singles out Christopher Walken’s energetic performance as a bright spot.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
29 September 2006 · Peter Bradshaw
60*

Bradshaw finds the film a goofy, sentimental improvement over Sandler’s earlier attempt at Capra-style comedy, though it remains flawed. He praises its moments of good-natured sweetness while criticizing Sandler as conceited and opaque.

Read the full review →
Total Film
29 September 2006 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The critic finds Click uneven, with a strong central idea undermined by gross-out comedy and sugary sentiment. They praise its inventive uses of the remote-control premise, especially when the story explores its nightmarish consequences.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · John Ferguson
40

Ferguson finds the fantasy comedy undermined by queasy sentimentality and calls Sandler unusually unlikeable. He also notes that the starry supporting cast struggles to make much headway.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 June 2006 · Justin Chang
30*

Chang finds the comedy conspicuously unfunny, despite a cleverly conceived premise and a strong turn toward family drama. He praises the later, straight-played scenes for extracting unexpectedly resonant moments from the story’s family lessons.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
20 June 2006 · ★/4 · Nick Schager
25

Schager pans the film as a narrow, puerile comedy that collapses into overearnest schmaltz. He singles out Christopher Walken’s bizarre, inventive performance as a rare bright spot.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 September 2006 · Jennie Kermode
65*

Kermode finds the film a flawed but entertaining comedy that rises above familiar material. She praises Christopher Walken’s sinister performance and Sandler’s portrayal of Michael’s desperation and vulnerability.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate