Critics’ reviews

Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (2009)

11 reviews from 11 publications. Critics’ score 70: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

70
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
1

Most critics like this one, several more than they expected to. Nine of the eleven reviews are positive, and the praise clusters in the same places: the invention of the food set pieces, the density of the sight gags, and a script whose jokes work for adults as well as children. Several also credit the father-son relationship with holding the spectacle together.

The reservations are about weight, not tone. Several critics find the story too slight for a feature, with a second act that slows once familiar themes arrive, and Digital Spy finds the moralising wearying. The 3D divides them: Empire calls it effective, while Digital Spy and Eye for Film think it adds little. The spread is wide. The Hollywood Reporter doubts the premise can sustain the running time, and Eye for Film, the one outright negative, calls the film thin and forgettable while allowing that children will still enjoy it.

Time Out
14 September 2009 · ★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
80

The review gives the film four stars and presents it as a challenger to Pixar’s dominance in computer animation. The available text singles out that challenge, but does not reveal a specific element of the film that the critic praises.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 January 2009 · Helen O'Hara
75*

O’Hara finds the film bright, silly and entertaining, though familiar story themes slow the second act. She praises its witty dialogue, lively voice cast and effective 3D spectacle.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 September 2009 · ★★★/4 · Adam Keleman
75

Keleman finds the film sweet, buoyant, and imaginative, though less nuanced than its Pixar peers. He praises the heartfelt father-son relationship for grounding the food-frenzy spectacle.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
17 September 2009 · Keith Phipps
75*

Phipps finds the film brisk, bright, and winning, though its warning about abundance already feels out of touch. He praises its clever sight gags, lively visual style, and endearing characters.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 September 2009 · Xan Brooks
75*

Brooks finds the film an exuberant, varied animated comedy and a sly parable of consumption. He praises its mix of the bland and bizarre, sweet and sour, and its imaginative food-based set pieces.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
17 September 2009 · Stephen Farber
45*

Farber finds the film’s premise appealing but says the story and animation do not sustain a feature-length runtime. He praises James Caan’s performance and some visual gags, while noting that the target audience may still enjoy it.

Read the full review →
/Film
18 September 2009 · 8.5/10 · Devindra Hardawar
85

The critic considers the film a surprisingly strong kids’ movie and an excellent comedy. They especially praise its writing and humor, which work for adults as well as children.

Read the full review →
Collider
3 February 2010 · Andre Dellamorte
80*

The critic finds the film funny, sweet, and inventive, though it falls short of classic status. He especially praises its strong pacing and the heartfelt father-son relationship.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
29 January 2010 · ★★★★ · Simon Brew
80

Brew warmly recommends the film and calls it one of 2009’s most welcome animated surprises. He praises its vibrant, inventive visuals, while noting that the story feels too slight for its runtime.

Read the full review →
Digital Spy
15 September 2009
70*

The critic finds it a worthwhile, harmless family film, though its moralizing can become wearying. They praise its imaginative food-related humor and its action-film parody, while noting that 3D adds little.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
29 September 2009 · Martin Gray
30*

Gray finds the film a thin, forgettable family adventure despite its appeal to children. He praises the comic Baby Brent and the touching relationship between Flint and his father, but criticizes the repetitive set pieces and restrained use of 3D.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate