Critics’ reviews

Cold Mountain (2003)

14 reviews from 14 publications. Critics’ score 55: 2 positive, 7 mixed, 5 negative.

Back to our review of Cold Mountain

55
Positive
2
Mixed
7
Negative
5
The AV Club
22 February 2012 · Noel Murray
75*

Murray sees Cold Mountain as an artful, involving prestige film that is more incisive than its Oscar-bait reputation suggests. He praises Minghella and editor Walter Murch’s rhythmic cutting between the soldier’s journey and the farm’s struggle to survive.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 December 2003 · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the adaptation skillful, involving, and handsomely made, though more likely to earn respect than ardent enthusiasm. He especially praises the performances of Renee Zellweger and Nicole Kidman, whose relationship gives the story its strongest positive dynamic.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Will Lawrence
65*

Lawrence finds the film an overlong, sometimes gratuitous drama that still has enough wonders to win him over. He praises its technical work, spectacular action and richly drawn characters.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
8 December 2003 · Kirk Honeycutt
65*

Honeycutt finds the film a somber, sometimes chilly but carefully crafted adaptation that conveys hope amid wartime brutality. He praises the cast, especially Renée Zellweger, and the production team’s vivid recreation of the landscape.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
8 December 2003 · Mike Goodridge
64*

This is a review of the 2003 film, but the critic’s verdict is not visible. The paywall also hides any specific praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
25 December 2003 · A.O. Scott
64*

The page is identifiable as a review of Cold Mountain, but its text is unavailable here. I cannot reliably determine the critic’s verdict or what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TCh
64*

The available page metadata identifies this as a review, but provides no critical verdict. Its description focuses on Inman’s arduous journey home to Ada.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Dave Aldridge
60

A mixed review says the Jude Law and Nicole Kidman pairing delivers less than its promise. It notes that the novel’s plot keeps the leads apart for long stretches, limiting their on-screen partnership.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 December 2003 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review calls the film a missed opportunity, with its central romance failing to spark. It praises the vivid supporting performances, especially Brendan Gleeson, as reminders of the novel’s depiction of ordinary people changed by war.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
8 December 2003 · ★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
38

Gonzalez dismisses the film as overwrought and cloying, arguing that its romance trivializes race and war. He praises the encounter between Inman and Sara for evoking the lasting force of love amid wartime separation.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Will Self
35*

Self finds the film uneven and overlong, with the romance undermined by a lack of chemistry between Kidman and Law. He praises the vivid, grotesque encounters along Inman’s journey and finds Law’s portion the most satisfying.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
19 December 2003 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

Bradshaw finds the romantic drama good-looking but dull, with little spark between its leads. He particularly criticizes Renée Zellweger’s accent and the film’s evasive treatment of slavery.

Read the full review →
The Independent
28 December 2003 · Jonathan Romney
30*

Romney finds the film ambitious but ultimately artificial and unsatisfying, with its different elements failing to cohere. He praises the opening battle scenes for their urgency and brutal force.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
24 December 2003 · Angus Wolfe Murray
40*

The review finds the film overly romanticized and visually over-polished, with an ending that feels like studio interference. It praises Jude Law’s performance and Nicole Kidman’s emotional range, while criticizing Renée Zellweger’s overacting.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate