Critics’ reviews

Cool Hand Luke (1967)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 79: 9 positive, 1 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Cool Hand Luke

79
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Cool Hand Luke, with praise centred on Paul Newman’s understated performance as a defiant prisoner. The reviews repeatedly find humour alongside the brutality of captivity, and several admire how the film handles individual freedom without losing sight of the people involved. Newman’s sardonic manner and quiet authority draw consistent approval, while the supporting cast also earns praise, particularly George Kennedy and Jo Van Fleet.

The differences concern how firmly the film presses its themes and how efficiently it tells its story. Slant Magazine finds the Christ imagery heavy-handed and the sentiment intrusive, despite admiring the ensemble; Variety finds the film engaging but its exposition rambling. The spread runs from enthusiastic endorsement to qualified approval rather than outright rejection, with Newman remaining a point of agreement even among the more reserved notices.

RogerEbert.com
★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The page’s review content could not be accessed, so its verdict and specific praise cannot be verified. The available page provides no reliable details about what the critic singled out.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
31 October 2019 · John Mahoney
90*

Mahoney praises the film as a powerful, humorous and deeply dramatic study of people in captivity. He singles out Jo Van Fleet’s brief scene with Newman as one of the film’s finest moments.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Tony Sloman
80

The critic regards the film as a key American work, praising its subtle treatment of individual freedom. Paul Newman’s performance and the prologue and egg-eating scene stand out as especially memorable.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
78*

Newman gives the film a strongly positive verdict, calling it both an excellent prison movie and a comic allegory of redemption. He singles out Paul Newman’s performance and the film’s memorable moments and supporting cast for praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
13 April 2023 · ★★★½ · Bill Weber
70

Weber finds the film compelling but undermined by its heavy-handed Christ imagery and sentimental touches. He praises the ensemble cast and the strong, detailed 4K transfer.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
2 November 1967 · Bosley Crowther
70*

Crowther presents the film as a forceful portrait of a man born to lose. He singles out Paul Newman’s performance as superb.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TM
70*

The review presents the film as caustically witty and speaks approvingly of Paul Newman’s sardonic performance. It singles out Newman’s portrayal of a defiant chain-gang prisoner, though the full review text is unavailable.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1966 · Variety Staff
65*

The review finds the film engaging overall, though its exposition rambles and it ends on a downbeat note. It especially praises Paul Newman’s performance and the strong supporting cast.

Read the full review →
Paste
12 November 2008 · Jonah Flicker
90*

The review finds the film as fresh and vibrant decades later. It singles out Paul Newman’s understated, quietly compelling performance as the film’s anchor.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
14 October 2008 · 5 out of 5 · Simon Brew
86*

Brew calls the film brilliant and says it retains its dramatic power, while the Blu-ray disc itself is not essential. He especially praises Paul Newman’s subtle, mesmerizing performance, with George Kennedy also singled out for an excellent supporting turn.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate