Critics’ reviews

Crimes and Misdemeanors (1989)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 72: 4 positive, 4 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Crimes and Misdemeanors

72
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
0

Most critics like Crimes and Misdemeanors, and the praise clusters around the same thing: Allen’s decision to run a murder melodrama alongside a comedy and let the two stories comment on each other. Several reviews rank it among his strongest work for that reason, crediting the writing and direction with holding the halves together and the ensemble with making each side convincing. Alan Alda’s Lester is the performance most often singled out, and the moral contrast between the two plots is what the more admiring critics keep returning to.

The reservations are about balance. Variety finds the blend of melodrama and comedy uneven and thinks Anjelica Huston is let down by an underwritten role, though it too considers Alda ideally cast. Slant, reviewing much later, admires the film’s self-criticism more than it admires the disc it arrived on. The spread is otherwise narrow: no review dismisses it, and the mixed verdicts read as qualified respect rather than complaint.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Barry McIlheney
90*

The review finds the film marvellously entertaining and provocative. It singles out Allen’s wit and intelligence, along with the strong performances and memorable dialogue.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 July 1990 · Derek Malcolm
90*

Malcolm calls the film one of Allen’s best, praising its balance of comedy and serious reflection. He singles out the seamless direction, writing and ensemble performances for making its two storylines work together.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 October 1989 · MICHAEL WILMINGTON
85*

Wilmington sees the film as a major achievement that unites Allen’s comic and serious sides. He especially praises its sharp moral contrast between the stories and its performances, particularly Alan Alda’s portrayal of Lester.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
70*

The review treats the film as a compelling examination of morality and consequence. It singles out Woody Allen’s philosophical depth for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
13 October 1989 · Vincent Canby
65*

The supplied page does not expose the review’s verdict or discussion. I can’t reliably identify what the critic singled out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The accessible page does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It also contains no information about what the critic praised or complained about.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
16 February 2014 · ★★★ · Chuck Bowen
60

Bowen regards the film as a revealing, self-critical work, while finding its Blu-ray presentation merely competent. He praises the film’s examination of its protagonists’ hypocrisy but faults the release for its barebones extras and unremarkable image and sound.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
50*

The critic finds Allen’s ambitious blend of melodrama and comedy uneven. They fault Anjelica Huston’s performance in an underwritten role, while finding Alan Alda ideally cast.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate