Critics’ reviews

Dawson City: Frozen Time (2017)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 75: 8 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Dawson City: Frozen Time

75
Positive
8
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like Bill Morrison’s documentary, and the praise lands in the same place nearly every time: the rescued nitrate footage, and the long, ghostly montages Morrison cuts it into. Several call the film a time capsule or a time machine, and the reviews return again and again to the idea that history is whatever happens to survive. The editing is singled out as often as the footage, and a number of critics are moved, calling the film mournful, elegiac and poignant.

The reservations are about length and focus. Several find two hours too many; Variety says the final half-hour goes on too long, and The Hollywood Reporter faults a wandering focus. Alex Somers’s score divides them: Variety finds it haunting, while The New Yorker and IndieWire call it distracting and dirge-like. IndieWire is the coolest voice, admiring the preservation work but finding the storytelling dry and cold. Nobody is negative, and the spread runs from warm to admiring.

Los Angeles Times
15 June 2017 · Kenneth Turan
95*

Turan calls the documentary a thrilling, visually astonishing achievement that makes its many strands compelling. He especially praises Morrison’s striking use of the recovered footage and its expressive montages.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
27 January 2020 · Nick Bradshaw
80*

Bradshaw finds the film dazzling, sensitive and mournful as it explores the fragility of memory and film history. He praises Morrison’s use of the rediscovered footage, while finding the baseball World Series passage comparatively flat.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
8 June 2017 · B · David Ehrlich
77

Ehrlich finds the film’s preservation work marvelous but its storytelling too dry and cold. He praises the evocative sense of how history is shaped by whatever survives, while faulting the film’s scattershot approach and dirge-like score.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
75*

The critic finds the documentary elegiac and sharply analytical, with an intellectually powerful sweep through history. They single out Morrison’s editing and ghostly archival footage for praise, while calling the insistent music distracting.

Read the full review →
Variety
28 June 2017 · Owen Gleiberman
72*

Gleiberman finds the documentary a captivating, time-machine-like meditation on the birth of modernity. He praises Alex Somers’s haunting score and the mystery of the archival images, but says the final half-hour goes on too long.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 June 2017 · B- · Ignatiy Vishnevetsky
70

The review finds Bill Morrison’s documentary intelligent but overlong and too deliberate. It praises the hypnotic archival collage, especially a montage that turns a forgotten film cliché into an insight.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 October 2016 · festival review · Frank Scheck
70*

Scheck finds the documentary a captivating, poignant time capsule, though its two-hour length and wandering focus can frustrate. He especially praises the haunting, fascinating rescued silent-film footage.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The URL identifies a RogerEbert.com review of the named film, but the page text is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and any specifically praised or criticized element cannot be determined.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
8 June 2017
65*

The page appears to be the publication’s review, but its verdict cannot be established from the blocked text. No praise or complaint is available to identify.

Read the full review →
Paste
7 June 2017 · 8.0 · Kenji Fujishima
86*

Fujishima finds the film an affecting and accessible work of history as well as a love letter to cinema. He especially praises the astonishing unearthed nitrate footage and its power to preserve history and art across time.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate