Critics’ reviews

Daylight (1996)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 47: 1 positive, 3 mixed, 3 negative.

Back to our review of Daylight

47
Positive
1
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics treat Daylight as a conventional disaster thriller, and the reviews lean mixed to negative. Where there is praise, it clusters on the spectacle: the special effects, the opening fireball and the suspense of the rescue sequences, with several reviewers allowing that the film delivers the genre’s basic goods competently. Rob Cohen’s action staging draws a nod, and Sylvester Stallone is noted for a more vulnerable turn than usual, which Radio Times counts as an unexpected strength.

The reservations gather around the story and the people in it. The plot is called formulaic by nearly everyone, and the harsher reviews find the trapped survivors hard to care about; The New Yorker goes further, judging the effects swamped by the star’s vanity. Variety’s dissent is specific, admiring Viggo Mortensen’s charisma and regretting how little the film makes of him. The spread is wide: Empire alone recommends it outright, while three reviews are plainly negative.

Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Nathan
75*

Nathan finds the film an enjoyable, effective disaster movie that delivers exactly what it promises. He praises its spectacular special effects, especially the opening fireball, while noting its cheesy acting and predictable story.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· NB
64*

The available page identifies this as a review but does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its description gives the trapped-group premise, without showing what the critic praises or criticizes.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Jason Caro
60

Caro finds the film involving and solidly entertaining, though not a genre classic. He praises Rob Cohen’s action staging and Sylvester Stallone’s unexpectedly vulnerable performance.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
6 December 1996 · ★★/4 · Roger Ebert
50

Ebert regards the film as a conventional disaster thriller. He singles out its suspenseful rescue sequences, while finding the story formulaic.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 December 1996 · Janet Maslin
30*

The review is negative about the film. It faults the disaster-movie storytelling rather than singling out a strength.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 April 1997 · Todd McCarthy
30*

McCarthy finds the disaster thriller limited in imagination and excitement, with its trapped characters often difficult to care about. He praises Viggo Mortensen’s charismatic performance, lamenting that the film kills off his character too early.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
15 December 1996 · Sarah Kerr
20*

The critic finds the disaster film a poor entry in its genre, with special effects overwhelmed by the star’s vanity. She also singles out the trapped survivors as clumsy, hysterical, and mean.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate