Critics’ reviews

Death and the Maiden (1994)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 66: 3 positive, 3 mixed, 1 negative.

Back to our review of Death and the Maiden

66
Positive
3
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour of the film, if not warmly. The praise clusters on the three leads, Sigourney Weaver and Ben Kingsley above all, and on the uncertainty the pair keep alive over whether he is the man she says he is. Polanski’s handling of tension inside one confined house is the other recurring compliment; even the reviews that like the film least concede that the menace is expertly sustained.

The reservations are almost all about the writing. Several reviews find the characters turning into mouthpieces for the play’s arguments, and the moral questions put too plainly. The spread is wide: at one end the film is riveting despite the lecturing, at the other the Los Angeles Times finds it too schematic and self-important to feel rich. Three of the seven reviews could not be read in full, so the middle of the range is thinner than the counts suggest.

Slant Magazine
31 May 2003 · ★★★½/4 · Nick Schager
88

Schager finds the film’s moral questions sometimes didactic, but its volatility keeps it riveting. He especially praises the fierce interplay among the three leads and the powerful final crane shot.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Kim Newman
80*

Newman finds the film a chilling, thought-provoking success, despite its less personal feel and predictable late revelations. He particularly praises Weaver and Kingsley’s performances and Polanski’s tension-building.

Read the full review →
Variety
12 December 1994 · Todd McCarthy
70*

McCarthy finds the film tense and skillfully made, though its characters can feel like mouthpieces for ideology. He praises the three lead performances, particularly the suspenseful ambiguity created by Ben Kingsley and Sigourney Weaver.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The page is blocked by a browser check, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint is available in the provided page text.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
23 December 1994 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page content is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be verified. No specific praise or complaint can be reliably identified from the accessible text.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The page identifies this as a film review, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint cannot be determined from the accessible content.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
23 December 1994 · Peter Rainer
35*

Rainer finds the film unsettling and expertly claustrophobic, but ultimately too schematic and self-important to feel rich. He praises Polanski’s sustained atmosphere of menace, while faulting the story’s narrow, grindingly creepy execution.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate