Critics’ reviews

Deconstructing Harry (1997)

10 reviews from 10 publications. Critics’ score 62: 4 positive, 4 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Deconstructing Harry

62
Positive
4
Mixed
4
Negative
2

The reviews lean cautiously favourable, though agreement is stronger on the film’s dark humour and formal invention than on its merits as a whole. Praise centres on the shifts between Harry’s real and fictional lives, the clarity of the complicated storytelling and the willingness to leave its protagonist unredeemed. The Independent particularly admires the brisk storytelling, inventive editing and sharp ensemble scenes. Supporters find the comedy painfully self-critical, with several praising its ability to make uncomfortable material funny.

The spread is wide, and the treatment of women is a dividing point. Empire finds laughs but is disturbed by Allen’s scathing treatment of women and his own neuroses. The AV Club goes much further, finding sexist characterisation, self-indulgence and too few laughs to compensate. Elsewhere, reservations concern familiarity and abrasiveness: qualities that admirers accept as part of the film’s risk-taking, rather than reasons to dismiss it.

The Independent
4 April 1998 · David Thomson
90*

Thomson praises the film as an assured, richly constructed achievement and argues that Allen is a major director. He singles out the film’s brisk, lucid storytelling, inventive editing, and sharp ensemble scenes for praise.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
11 January 2007 · robbiefreeling
75*

The critic finds the film endlessly funny, unusually dark, and refreshingly unwilling to redeem its protagonist. They single out its painful, self-lacerating humor and disorienting shifts between reality and fiction.

Read the full review →
Variety
7 September 1997 · festival review · David Stratton
75*

Stratton finds the film provocative, funny and challenging, though its abrasive comedy may divide audiences. He especially praises how clearly Allen handles the film’s complex, shifting structure.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
64*

The URL identifies a review of the specified film, but the page content is unavailable. The browser-check page provides no critic verdict or praise to summarize.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 December 1997 · Janet Maslin
64*

The page appears to be a review, but its text is inaccessible. I cannot verify the critic’s verdict or what the review singles out.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its text is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be determined. No specific praise or complaint is accessible.

Read the full review →
Total Film
17 April 1998 · ★★★ · Total Film
60

The review finds the film darker and familiar in style, but ultimately witty, inventive, and very funny. It praises the abundance of ingenious comic sequences, especially the chaotic car-journey episode.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Angie Errigo
40*

Errigo finds the film funny but deeply unsettling, with its dark comedy making it uncomfortable to watch. She singles out Allen’s scathing, self-confessional treatment of women and his own neuroses as especially disturbing.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
3 May 2002 · Nathan Rabin
10*

Rabin calls the film a self-indulgent, hateful mess with too few laughs to recommend. He particularly faults its sexist portrayals of women.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
19 January 2001 · Angus Wolfe Murray
85*

The critic strongly praises the film as a sharp, relevant, and risk-taking comedy. He singles out Allen’s treatment of Harry’s real and fictional lives as an unusually convincing portrait of the creative psyche.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate