Critics’ reviews

Diary of a Country Priest (1951)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 77: 5 positive, 3 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Diary of a Country Priest

77
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Bresson’s austere treatment of faith and isolation, with praise clustering around his formal precision and attention to the priest’s inner life. The available reviews find considerable feeling in the film’s restraint and gradual accumulation of detail. Claude Laydu’s performance also draws praise: Radio Times finds him convincing, while other accounts value the way Bresson makes the priest’s solitude felt without relaxing his severe style.

The clearest reservation concerns how readily that severity admits the viewer. The AV Club admires the film’s precision but finds it can feel airless, with limited emotional access to the central performance. The recorded scores range from mixed to enthusiastic, with none negative, but the apparent disagreement needs qualification: three review texts are inaccessible, so their specific objections cannot be established. The verifiable reservations centre on austerity rather than failures of craft.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · David Parkinson
100

Parkinson calls the film a sublime masterpiece and an almost spiritual experience. He particularly praises Claude Laydu’s convincing performance and Bresson’s gradual accumulation of detail.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 April 2011 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Turan presents the film as a masterwork and urges readers to experience it. He especially praises Bresson’s austere visual and emotional style, which he says achieves transcendence.

Read the full review →
Empire
31 March 2006 · David Parkinson
85*

Parkinson finds Bresson’s adaptation impressive and affecting, praising its blend of asceticism and spirituality. He singles out the film’s stylistic purity and focus on the priest’s inner life.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
8 March 2004 · Scott Tobias
75*

Tobias admires the film’s formal precision and finds its closing moments transcendent, though its austerity can make it feel airless. He singles out the priest’s isolation as vividly rendered, while noting that the lead performance offers little emotional access.

Read the full review →
Time Out
15 March 2012
70*

The available description presents Bresson’s film as a challenging, austere study of faith and isolation. It singles out the lead performance as memorable.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
65*

The page could not be accessed, so the critic’s verdict is unavailable. No praised or criticized element could be verified.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 April 1954
65*

The page identifies a review, but the article text is inaccessible. Its verdict and specific praise or criticism cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
· Mark Kermode
64*

The page identifies this as a DVD review, but the review text is unavailable. Its verdict and the element singled out for praise or complaint cannot be determined.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate