Critics’ reviews

Dracula (1958)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 69: 6 positive, 0 mixed, 2 negative.

Back to our review of Dracula

69
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
2

Most critics respond warmly to Dracula, with praise clustering around Christopher Lee, Peter Cushing and the gothic atmosphere. Lee’s sinister, seductive presence draws particular attention, while Cushing receives consistent approval from reviews that discuss both leads. Terence Fisher’s direction is another strength for admirers, who find his visual style effective in sustaining unease. Several reviews argue that the film retains its power, even when its shocks no longer have their original force.

The spread is wide rather than cautiously favourable: six reviews are positive and two negative. Reservations among admirers concern dated pacing and diminished shock value, but the dissent goes further. The Guardian finds the plot creaky and the style cheap and garish, judging the film inferior to the prewar Universal horrors. The central disagreement is over how well it holds up: most critics still find atmosphere and menace where its harshest assessors find little to admire.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The review calls the film a modern classic and praises its epoch-making impact. It singles out the gothic atmosphere, Fisher’s stylish direction and the performances by Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing.

Read the full review →
The Independent
25 October 2007
85*

The review is strongly positive, describing the film as groundbreaking Hammer horror. It singles out Christopher Lee’s sinister, seductive performance and the film’s erotic charge.

Read the full review →
Time Out
29 October 2007 · ★★★★ · David Jenkins
80

Jenkins gives the restored film a positive verdict, saying it has retained much of its bite. He singles out its creepy period atmosphere and tripartite narrative.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 October 2022 · Alan Morrison
75*

Morrison finds the film still potent despite its diminished shock value over time. He praises Christopher Lee’s layered Dracula and Terence Fisher’s strong visual style.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1957 · Variety Staff
75*

Variety gives the film a positive verdict, praising its tension and suspense. It singles out Peter Cushing’s performance as impressive and Christopher Lee’s Dracula as thoroughly gruesome.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
28 October 2007 · Philip French
30*

French regards the film as inferior to the prewar Universal horror classics, despite its lasting place in British horror. He singles out its creaky plot and conspicuously cheap, garish style for criticism.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
29 May 1958 · Bosley Crowther
25*

The review appears to take a negative view of the film. The page text is inaccessible, so its specific praise or complaint cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Eye for Film
7 March 2010 · Stephen Carty
85*

Carty regards this as the definitive Dracula adaptation, despite some dated pacing and limitations. He praises the eerie atmosphere and the performances of Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate