Critics’ reviews

Drugstore Cowboy (1989)

7 reviews from 7 publications. Critics’ score 77: 5 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Drugstore Cowboy

77
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like Drugstore Cowboy, and the praise lands in the same place: Matt Dillon. Nearly every review that gives a verdict singles out his performance as Bob, the thieving addict who narrates the film, and more than one credits him with holding the man’s charm and his physical decline in the same frame. Beyond Dillon, the reviews agree that Gus Van Sant treats drug use honestly, without either romance or sermon, and that the film is funny and easy to watch for something so bleak. Kelly Lynch draws a mention from Variety.

The reservations are few and mostly about the ending. Empire finds it abrupt; The Guardian finds it conventionally upbeat for a film otherwise so clear-eyed. Nobody dislikes it. Two of the seven reviews, from The New York Times and Time Out, are on record but their verdicts are not readable, so the spread among the rest is narrow, running from warm to warmer.

Los Angeles Times
11 October 1989 · SHEILA BENSON
90*

Benson finds the film electrifying, funny, and compulsively watchable without romanticizing its characters’ drug-bound lives. She especially praises the haunting performances, particularly Matt Dillon’s narration as Bob.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1988 · Variety Staff
90*

The review praises the film as unusually honest and original in its portrayal of drug use. It singles out Kelly Lynch’s performance and calls Matt Dillon’s performance truly great.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 February 2025 · ★★★★ · Jake Cole
80

Cole praises the film’s tough, empathetic tone and unromantic depiction of addiction. He singles out Matt Dillon’s performance for balancing Bob’s roguish charm with the physical and mental toll of his lifestyle.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Barry Mcllheney
78*

The review calls it a cult classic worth seeking out, despite criticizing the abruptness of its ending. It particularly praises Matt Dillon’s performance and the film’s convincing, everyday realism.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
7 December 1989 · Derek Malcolm
75*

Malcolm finds the film worth seeing for its unusually mature, clear-eyed treatment of drug use, despite an orthodoxly upbeat ending. He particularly praises Van Sant’s fresh direction and truthful approach to the characters.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 October 1989 · Janet Maslin
65*

The page identifies a review of the film, but its text is inaccessible. The critic’s verdict and specific praise or complaints cannot be verified.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
64*

The available page identifies this as a review but does not provide the critic’s verdict. It offers no review text from which to identify what the critic praised or criticized.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate