Critics’ reviews

Dumbo (2019)

24 reviews from 24 publications. Critics’ score 49: 4 positive, 10 mixed, 10 negative.

Back to our review of Dumbo

49
Positive
4
Mixed
10
Negative
10

The reviews lean towards disappointment, though most critics find something to like in Dumbo himself. His expressive digital features and flying sequences draw the most consistent praise, offering warmth and excitement even for those unmoved by the surrounding story. The circus settings also earn approval, alongside Danny DeVito and Michael Keaton’s performances. The recurring complaint is that the elephant has to compete with thin human characters for attention.

The spread is wide: warmer responses find an appealing family film, while harsher ones describe a dull, overcomplicated remake that loses the original’s emotional force. Critics disagree on how much of Burton’s personality survives the spectacle, and whether its corporate criticism carries any weight. The AV Club finds that criticism surprisingly bold; Slant Magazine sees a film that remains compliant with Disney’s expectations. The bubble-based pink elephants sequence likewise divides opinion, pleasing The AV Club but disappointing The New Yorker.

Empire
26 March 2019 · Ben Travis
75*

The review finds the remake an enchanting blend of Disney warmth and Burton’s dark whimsy, though its human lead is forgettable. It praises Michael Keaton and Danny DeVito’s chemistry, along with the film’s visual design and soaring flight scenes.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
26 March 2019 · B- · Katie Rife
70

Rife finds the film’s corporate critique surprisingly bold but says its bland protagonists and muted spectacle blunt its impact. She praises the expressive CGI Dumbo and the inventive bubble-based take on “Pink Elephants On Parade.”

Read the full review →
Vulture
26 March 2019 · Bilge Ebiri
70*

Ebiri finds the film compromised but enjoyable, calling it one of Tim Burton’s better recent films. He praises the circus sequences and Dumbo’s odd, endearing animal presence, while criticizing the thin story and one-dimensional human characters.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 March 2019 · Tim Grierson
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but its paywall shell does not reveal the critic’s verdict. It provides no accessible praise or complaint to single out.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
27 March 2019
64*

The page could not be read, so the critic’s verdict cannot be confirmed. No specific praise or complaint is available in the supplied text.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
26 March 2019 · ★★½/4 · Matt Zoller Seitz
62

The review gives the film a mixed verdict, finding it emotionally appealing but uneven. It singles out the film’s sentiment while criticizing its execution.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · Alan Jones
60

The critic calls the live-action remake an uplifting wonder and an interesting addition to Disney’s roster. They praise Burton’s blend of pathos and dazzling spectacle, along with its charming story and engaging characters.

Read the full review →
Time Out
21 March 2019 · ★★★ · Phil de Semlyen
60

The review finds Burton’s adaptation veers between blandness and outlandishness. It initially questions how the baby elephant will look in live action, then suggests that concern is resolved.

Read the full review →
Total Film
26 March 2019 · ★★★ · Jamie Graham
60

The critic finds the film enjoyable but says it struggles to sustain its magic. They praise Dumbo’s soaring sequences and Burton’s critique of corporate greed, while finding the human-focused parts uninteresting.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
26 March 2019 · C · David Ehrlich
57

Ehrlich finds the film barely clears its own low bar, with flashes of Burton’s creative personality amid a weak script and tiresome spectacle. He especially praises Danny DeVito’s exuberant performance and the visual charm Burton brings to the circus.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
28 March 2019 · Kenneth Turan
50*

Turan finds the film sweet-natured but uneven, with its familiar sentiment keeping it from fully taking flight. He praises Dumbo’s visually inventive CG design and the thrill of its flight through the circus arena.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
29 March 2019 · ★★ · Matthew Norman
40

Norman judges the remake a disappointing, anodyne failure that loses the original’s balance of sweetness and bitterness. He praises the baby elephant’s soulful eyes and says the climax briefly redeems the film.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
26 March 2019 · 3/2/2 · Hannah Strong
40

Strong finds Burton’s adaptation a gigantic disappointment and a pale imitation of the original. She singles out the sweet baby elephant as the one thing worth watching, while criticizing the overstuffed story and lack of visual wonder.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
27 March 2019 · ★½/4 · Keith Watson
38

The review finds Burton’s film conventional, bland, and ultimately compliant with Disney’s corporate expectations. It praises the imaginative circus environments, especially the elaborate Dreamland setting, while faulting the thin human characters and safe climax.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 March 2019 · Anthony Lane
35*

Lane finds Burton’s Dumbo mostly glum and dramatically listless, with little spark in the reunion of Burton and Keaton. He singles out Dumbo’s flying sequences as the film’s best moments, while criticizing the replacement of the original’s pink elephants with soap bubbles.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 March 2019 · David Rooney
30*

Rooney finds the remake uneven, overstuffed, and less emotionally affecting than the original. He praises the production design and costumes, while noting that the elephant only becomes the movie’s heart near the end.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 March 2019 · Owen Gleiberman
30*

Gleiberman finds the remake overburdened and emotionally forgettable, despite Dumbo himself remaining touching. He praises the flying sequences for briefly recapturing the original’s wonder.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 March 2019 · ★ · Peter Bradshaw
20

Bradshaw calls the remake a dull, overcomplicated failure that loses the original’s charm and pathos. He particularly faults its handling of Dumbo’s separation from his mother and the drawn-out third act.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 April 2019 · Alex Dudok de Wit
15*

The critic finds the remake a timid, disappointing failure that lacks Burton’s distinctive touch. They single out the slapdash script and the film’s sidelining of Dumbo as major weaknesses.

Read the full review →
Consequence
26 March 2019 · Caroline Siede
70*

Siede finds Dumbo an agreeable, open-hearted family film despite thin characters and a clumsy climax. She praises its warm performances and thoughtful update of the original’s animal-rights themes.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
27 March 2019 · 2 out of 5 · Don Kaye
51*

Kaye finds the remake tepid, weighed down by tedious human melodrama and an underused Dumbo. He praises the flying sequences as the few moments that achieve magic, pathos, and grandeur.

Read the full review →
Paste
30 March 2019 · 4.0 · Oktay Ege Kozak
50*

Kozak finds the remake disappointing, arguing that Dumbo is sidelined by shallow human characters and a plot that loses momentum. He praises Michael Keaton’s campy performance as Vandevere as one of the few elements that sustains interest.

Read the full review →
/Film
26 March 2019 · 4/10 · Josh Spiegel
40

Spiegel finds Burton’s remake uninspired and poorly focused, with Dumbo sidelined by the human drama. He praises the circus-theme-park design and Keaton and DeVito’s energetic performances.

Read the full review →
The Wrap
26 March 2019
20*

The critic finds Burton’s remake a lifeless, throwaway adventure that lacks the original’s heart and innovation. They praise the digital Dumbo’s tangible presence, but complain that the abundance of glossy effects turns much of the film into visual mush.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate