Critics’ reviews

Easy Rider (1969)

8 reviews from 8 publications. Critics’ score 80: 6 positive, 2 mixed, 0 negative.

Back to our review of Easy Rider

80
Positive
6
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics respond warmly to Easy Rider, with praise clustering around its countercultural spirit, visual freedom and Jack Nicholson’s performance. The reviews repeatedly single out Nicholson for giving the film emotional weight and a persuasive expression of alienation. Hopper’s direction also draws praise for its fluid, observant movement, dreamlike passages and evocative landscapes. Several critics find that its account of social unease retains its force, rather than treating it solely as a document of its period.

The reservations concern how convincingly the film makes its case and how consistently its craft holds up. The Hollywood Reporter argues that the drug-dealing premise weakens its argument, despite a strongly positive verdict. Den of Geek acknowledges its historical importance and visceral impact but finds the artistry uneven. The balance is favourable, though unavailable text for two reviews limits what can be said about the less enthusiastic responses.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Tom Hutchinson
100

The critic praises the film’s mythic force and its influence on road movies. They single out Jack Nicholson’s performance as an eloquent expression of youthful alienation.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
9 May 2016 · ★★★★½ · Chuck Bowen
90

Bowen finds the film timeless, with its diagnosis of modern social malaise gaining force over time. He praises Hopper’s vivid, dreamlike visual flow and the film’s evocative landscapes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
85*

The retrospective review presents the film favorably. It singles out the film’s countercultural spirit as a key strength.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
26 June 1969 · John Mahoney
82*

Mahoney gives the film a strongly positive verdict, while noting that its drug-dealing premise weakens its argument. He especially praises Jack Nicholson’s performance as the film’s emotional and thematic anchor.

Read the full review →
Variety
14 May 1969 · festival review · Gene Moskowitz
80*

Moskowitz finds the film perceptive, poetic, and far above typical films on the subject. He praises Hopper’s fluid, observant direction and the film’s evocative visual style.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
15 July 1969 · Vincent Canby
65*

The article appears to be a review, but its verdict and specific praise or complaint cannot be verified from the inaccessible page. The available page text provides no review details.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CPe
64*

The page identifies itself as a film review, but its review text is unavailable, so the critic’s verdict cannot be established. No specific praise or complaint is visible in the supplied material.

Read the full review →
Den of Geek
15 December 2009 · 2 out of 5 · Michael Leader
72*

The critic finds the film’s historical importance and visceral impact undeniable, though its artistry is uneven. He praises Jack Nicholson’s nuanced performance but considers the Blu-ray package underwhelming and its ending awkward.

Read the full review →

Ordered by the weight we give each publication, then by score. Scores are normalised to 100; * means inferred from an unrated review. Summaries are ours, not quotations; follow the links for the reviews themselves. How we rate